- Oct 29, 2019
- 624
- 1,945
I can definitely see your side of the argument.Then with your logic, Hunter would have no problem fucking his family, but probably won't in canon? Though we never seen him do it, we KNOW that he would if given the chance. You not want to believe he wouldn't do it because it doesn't sit well with you personally is not a good reason to believe the characters wouldn't do what they are shown to do if given the chance.
As it stands, there's more evidence to show the characters would do their actions then wouldn't. Your only argument that they wouldn't is that you don't like the conclusions it would lead too. My evidence is their behaviors in bad ends. It's material evidence vs feelings in this case.
The trouble is- has WWG ever addressed what we're talking about here? That the characters' behaviors in the bad ends is how they would actually act if given the opportunity?
You are correct that my assertion is based more on feelings, but here's my rationale:
I want to believe that Sterling isn't the only thing separating these girls from throwing themselves at every dick that comes their way. Are we supposed to believe he's the only one preventing them from becoming cum dumpsters to whoever wants it (even dogs?)?
In the canon story, there is evidence that suggests Hunter would act a certain way if given the chance. The drugs, the webcams, his escapades with Drew, etc. However, in the canon story there isn't much evidence that the girls would act as I mentioned above (except for maybe Nora and Keira, but that's a different conversation). They all seem to be pretty satisfied with Sterling (and perhaps some occasional girl-on-girl action), and equally repulsed by Hunter & Kevin.
If WWG truly is telling us that all these women are helpless dick fiends, unable to control themselves at the sight of any penis, and Sterling is the only one preventing them from doing so, then perhaps my issue is more with WWG's writing, as that would reduce these women to stereotypical bimbos.