The patch is only mandatory because of Patreon. It's not his fault Patreon sucks and is extremely inconsistent on who they target. This game even with the patch is a lot tamer than some of the shit still on there.Maybe don't make the patch mandatory to be able to play the game.....
(Insert Sarcasm). I always make my employees give me a list of everything they spent their money on. I don't want to get into trouble if they buy and illicit drugs. FFS."You are earning funds through Patreon, we may be held accountable for what you do with those funds, so we may also look at what you do with your work off our platform."
What a joke. Fuck Patreon.
Remember what Patreon is: a way to financially support a creator which enables them to continue creating. But obviously a creator can't make illegal content and use Patreon to fund it, or Patreon absolutely could be held accountable. Imagine if someone made a page for the clear purpose of, I dunno, providing material support to a terrorist group. It's their money, right?Latest update in the patreon saga. It would be best if F95 removes the links here, so WWG won't have to change his URL. If WWG is the one to change his URL, every site, not just f95, will no longer work and WWG will lose a lot of traffic to his page. Old links will no longer work and people may mistake that as WWG no longer having a page or working on the game.
Best case scenario is F95 removes the links from the front page and WWG gets to keep his current URL.
View attachment 3925589
I can understand and respect that. But there seems to be a gaping wide loophole and that's the creator using the patreon funds for projects not listed on Patreon. Like if a porn dev wanted to what's to stop them from listing their Patreon for a game called, I don't know "Hello Pussy Island Adventure" but then using most of the funding to work on their passion project "Oops I got Reincarnated as a Puppy and Now I Must Fuck My Former Family" (OIRPNIMFMFF for short). As long as the Patreon only mentions Hello Pussy do they have any grounds for removal? Because that seems impossible to enforce.Remember what Patreon is: a way to financially support a creator which enables them to continue creating. But obviously a creator can't make illegal content and use Patreon to fund it, or Patreon absolutely could be held accountable. Imagine if someone made a page for the clear purpose of, I dunno, providing material support to a terrorist group. It's their money, right?
By "we may be held accountable for what you do with those funds" I can only assume they mean held accountable for the content/service funded through Patreon. That email pulls almost word-for-word from Patreon's Terms of Service, which to be honest are very poorly worded and should be rewritten for clarity:
Abusive conduct
To summarize: Be responsible and don’t violate our terms or policies.
You are responsible for all activity on your account. If you violate our terms or policies, then we may terminate your account. Don’t do anything illegal, abusive towards others, that abuses Patreon in a technical way, or that exploits Patreon in an unintended manner that is detrimental to us, like using Patreon as a storage platform. If you are a creator earning money on Patreon, we may be exposed to risk based on what you do with those funds. As a result, we may also look at what you do outside of Patreon. You can find more detailed information in the Community Guidelines and Security Policy. These terms and our policies cover most issues, but, if you find a new and creative way to hurt Patreon or our community, we may take action to prevent it.
I think in your scenario Patreon would allow it, as long as the "decoy" content was they only thing they were aware of. If they got wind of the "real" content I'm sure they'd pull the plug. Which begs the question: how would a creator advertise their "real" content in such a way to direct supporters to subscribe to the "decoy" content, without leaving any evidence for Patreon to piece it together...?I can understand and respect that. But there seems to be a gaping wide loophole and that's the creator using the patreon funds for projects not listed on Patreon. Like if a porn dev wanted to what's to stop them from listing their Patreon for a game called, I don't know "Hello Pussy Island Adventure" but then using most of the funding to work on their passion project "Oops I got Reincarnated as a Puppy and Now I Must Fuck My Former Family" (OIRPNIMFMFF for short). As long as the Patreon only mentions Hello Pussy do they have any grounds for removal? Because that seems impossible to enforce.
A site like F95Zone would be the place to do it. Of course Patreon would go Big Brother mode and monitor their posts here. But if Patreon can use legalese why not turn that on them? "Hey guys! I hope you enjoy my totally free morally reprehensible porn game about raping your former family members with your dog dick. If you'd like to support my OTHER totally legitimate real game here's a link to my Patreon! The two projects have nothing to do with each other but if you like this game you might like that one!"Which begs the question: how would a creator advertise their "real" content in such a way to direct supporters to subscribe to the "decoy" content, without leaving a evidence for Patreon to piece it together...?
No, that was a different game, but the same Patreon rep was involved when it came to that game I believe.wasn't this all because of some guy getting offended by someone disabled getting cucked? and then he went and tattled on this game specifically?
That was last time, yeah. We don't know who did it this time though. 8 games or so got hit pretty much at the same time and hardly any NTR games.wasn't this all because of some guy getting offended by someone disabled getting cucked? and then he went and tattled on this game specifically?
Yeah, like I said before, it's not about ntr. There's more to it than just ntr, maybe there's a guy hiding it somewhere who's upset with avn's...That was last time, yeah. We don't know who did it this time though. 8 games or so got hit pretty much at the same time and hardly any NTR games.
I suspect people will start going to subscribestar at this rate
Good luck, most won't be able to as their cards won't work or stop working (not to mention banks blacklisting SS), there is a reason many upon many developers lose support when they move to SS.subscribestar may get boost after all of this bullshit'
banned and not suspended? Do you remember the game? I wonder if that game was way over the line or if the dev didn't take action and attempt to do what Patreon asked them.