- May 12, 2017
- 323
- 1,371
Yes she's a big fan of the game, a top tier supporter on Patreon and pops into Discord from time to time...Does Lindsey Lohan know?
Yes she's a big fan of the game, a top tier supporter on Patreon and pops into Discord from time to time...Does Lindsey Lohan know?
Both works for me......Looks the mandatory patch links are down, can we have new links please ?
Just checked Lewdpatcher & Mediafire - both working fine.Looks the mandatory patch links are down, can we have new links please ?
Echo.....echo.......echo........Just checked Lewdpatcher & Mediafire - both working fine.
The patch is only mandatory because of Patreon. It's not his fault Patreon sucks and is extremely inconsistent on who they target. This game even with the patch is a lot tamer than some of the shit still on there.Maybe don't make the patch mandatory to be able to play the game.....
(Insert Sarcasm). I always make my employees give me a list of everything they spent their money on. I don't want to get into trouble if they buy and illicit drugs. FFS."You are earning funds through Patreon, we may be held accountable for what you do with those funds, so we may also look at what you do with your work off our platform."
What a joke. Fuck Patreon.
Remember what Patreon is: a way to financially support a creator which enables them to continue creating. But obviously a creator can't make illegal content and use Patreon to fund it, or Patreon absolutely could be held accountable. Imagine if someone made a page for the clear purpose of, I dunno, providing material support to a terrorist group. It's their money, right?Latest update in the patreon saga. It would be best if F95 removes the links here, so WWG won't have to change his URL. If WWG is the one to change his URL, every site, not just f95, will no longer work and WWG will lose a lot of traffic to his page. Old links will no longer work and people may mistake that as WWG no longer having a page or working on the game.
Best case scenario is F95 removes the links from the front page and WWG gets to keep his current URL.
View attachment 3925589
I can understand and respect that. But there seems to be a gaping wide loophole and that's the creator using the patreon funds for projects not listed on Patreon. Like if a porn dev wanted to what's to stop them from listing their Patreon for a game called, I don't know "Hello Pussy Island Adventure" but then using most of the funding to work on their passion project "Oops I got Reincarnated as a Puppy and Now I Must Fuck My Former Family" (OIRPNIMFMFF for short). As long as the Patreon only mentions Hello Pussy do they have any grounds for removal? Because that seems impossible to enforce.Remember what Patreon is: a way to financially support a creator which enables them to continue creating. But obviously a creator can't make illegal content and use Patreon to fund it, or Patreon absolutely could be held accountable. Imagine if someone made a page for the clear purpose of, I dunno, providing material support to a terrorist group. It's their money, right?
By "we may be held accountable for what you do with those funds" I can only assume they mean held accountable for the content/service funded through Patreon. That email pulls almost word-for-word from Patreon's Terms of Service, which to be honest are very poorly worded and should be rewritten for clarity:
Abusive conduct
To summarize: Be responsible and don’t violate our terms or policies.
You are responsible for all activity on your account. If you violate our terms or policies, then we may terminate your account. Don’t do anything illegal, abusive towards others, that abuses Patreon in a technical way, or that exploits Patreon in an unintended manner that is detrimental to us, like using Patreon as a storage platform. If you are a creator earning money on Patreon, we may be exposed to risk based on what you do with those funds. As a result, we may also look at what you do outside of Patreon. You can find more detailed information in the Community Guidelines and Security Policy. These terms and our policies cover most issues, but, if you find a new and creative way to hurt Patreon or our community, we may take action to prevent it.
I think in your scenario Patreon would allow it, as long as the "decoy" content was they only thing they were aware of. If they got wind of the "real" content I'm sure they'd pull the plug. Which begs the question: how would a creator advertise their "real" content in such a way to direct supporters to subscribe to the "decoy" content, without leaving any evidence for Patreon to piece it together...?I can understand and respect that. But there seems to be a gaping wide loophole and that's the creator using the patreon funds for projects not listed on Patreon. Like if a porn dev wanted to what's to stop them from listing their Patreon for a game called, I don't know "Hello Pussy Island Adventure" but then using most of the funding to work on their passion project "Oops I got Reincarnated as a Puppy and Now I Must Fuck My Former Family" (OIRPNIMFMFF for short). As long as the Patreon only mentions Hello Pussy do they have any grounds for removal? Because that seems impossible to enforce.