My reply was an answer to what dartred previously said. Maybe I should have quoted him directly in order to avoid any misunderstanding. I feel like there's no point continuing arguing about this topic, since apparently following someone with blind faith and becoming an accomplice to a crime is all nice&well as long a you express your displeasure after the fact and blaming it all on drugs seems like a bullet proof defense too...I said that he is a person with a good moral compass that isn't really himself right now.
Even if it's not strong, the smallest amount of foreshadowing is enough. Also in CH 5, they foreshadow bears are near. CH 10, Sterling is killed by a bear. You wouldn't have thought a bear would ever show up from that little conversation, but it's just to tell the readers that it's there.In my opinion those examples don't really constitute strong foreshadowing to the level that we got.
The first one is them playing a game where they seem to just be doing wacky things so I can't say it's foreshadowing. It seemed to me like just some random bullshitting on a game none of them had a stake in personally. I was fine with that. Nothing of this convo to me insinuates a future where an unavoidable LI would be into dogs.
I can't recall the context of the second one but I also don't think it hints hard in that direction either.
We should bear in mind the sequence of events.My reply was an answer to what dartred previously said. Maybe I should have quoted him directly in order to avoid any misunderstanding. I feel like there's no point continuing arguing about this topic, since apparently following someone with blind faith and becoming an accomplice to a crime is all nice&well as long a you express your displeasure after the fact and blaming it all on drugs seems like a bullet proof defense too...
Au contraire, detective, it speaks to the defendant's intent.That's a really paper thin defense...
Eh, I get what you're saying and I agree that WWG is usually pretty good on the foreshadowing front. But those two examples that you gave are ... not pretty good. The first one is just a joke and the one from Aliza is a comment that should remind us that what? dogs exist in this world?I get your point, but WWG is known to foreshadow events long before they happen. These are two different scenes from CH 5. Bestiality talk has been in the game for a while. second image might not be direct bestiality talk, but it can be used as an easy tie in. So who it happens with you can say it was random, but that it happened at all, not so much.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I agree with you on this front. A lot of people forget that Sterling trusts Brenna. Sure, he wasn't happy about having that symbol on his chest but he trusted Brenna to know what she's doing. Seeing the end result upset him because he realized that what she did to the clerk girl was overkill.No, i consider that he hated what she was doing and what it stood for, as MC having a good moral compass. He let it play out because Brenna kept telling him it was part of a plan. A plan that MC couldn't know what it would involve. He saw the plan and hated it. That's good morals. Bad morals would be if he liked any part of the plan.
so again, people are ignoring that MC hated what Brenna did.
I disagree; an innocuous convo that doesn't imply much and with very little to do in terms of the main story, wouldn't constitute foreshadowing or at least good foreshadowing. I'm not a mind reader and in no way would I have guessed that small wacky scene would foreshadow Rebecca.Even if it's not strong, the smallest amount of foreshadowing is enough. Also in CH 5, they foreshadow bears are near. CH 10, Sterling is killed by a bear. You wouldn't have thought a bear would ever show up from that little conversation, but it's just to tell the readers that it's there.
You really never know what in a conversation will ever be brought up again later. So it's just safe to assume that if they talk about it, be open to it showing up again.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I can't tell if you're intentionally making a strawman argument. I see two distinct issues: 1) Nazi imagery and 2) blackmail. Many have complained specifically about the Nazi imagery, and I was only addressing that. TBH I don't know much about blackmail laws.Good to know blackmailing isn't illegal in the US, even though the were kind of blackmailed before, although the time Brenna mentioned didn't feel like that much of a threat.
This right here should be the end all of the arguement. Sterling trusted Brenna, not the plan. He didn't know what the plan was after all. Brenna is the one who took advantage of his trust.I agree with you on this front. A lot of people forget that Sterling trusts Brenna.
It's like finding his cum sock. Except his sock was the walls. She has to call him out on it once it was found.I'm not sure why 2 minutes into the game the mother tell the MC she had to redecorate his room because he apparently "painted" the ceiling and walls with his semen, wth
And all he got to say about it is that he "got better at aiming", ???