You need to install the patchi have an issue , for some reason my game has a lot of missing scenes, i just hit chapter 6 without a single scene with one of the family member , and the sandbox seems to be missing as well
You need to install the patchi have an issue , for some reason my game has a lot of missing scenes, i just hit chapter 6 without a single scene with one of the family member , and the sandbox seems to be missing as well
What if someone self-inserts as the bull?Are the cucks throwing out "self-insertion" as if its some sort of insult, as if its not completely normal.
You draw entertainment from media through empathy, either empathising with the characters or the situation they're in. For you, you favor being in the situation of the guy not doing the fucking.
what if the guy calling everyone a cuck is, in fact, a cuck?What if someone self-inserts as the bull?
What if someone is a sadist who likes to watch the protagonist suffer?
What if someone is a misogynist who likes to watch women cheat to confirm his views on their inherent unfaithfulness?
![]()
Whether you're watching the MC, or another character doing the fucking in game...it's not your dick that's getting wet no matter how deeply you submerge yourself mentally. By your rationale, anyone playing the game meets your criteria of being a "cuck".Are the cucks throwing out "self-insertion" as if its some sort of insult, as if its not completely normal.
You draw entertainment from media through empathy, either empathising with the characters or the situation they're in. For you, you favor being in the situation of the guy not doing the fucking.
Unfortunately applying logic in this won't work. Not even when trying to make them see the flaw in their own.By your rationale, anyone playing the game meets your criteria of being a "cuck".
I thought Drew was complicit in the drugging aspect? I remember Drew only drew the line with Hunter when a tranquillizer was used, but was completely fine with aphrodisiacs.Technically Drew hasn't fucked any of those characters in canon.
Drew was fucking Nora and Keira up until 15 years ago, but as far as we know that was consensual and they weren't in other relationships.
I assume Drew fucked the women in the households that Hunter had previously conquered, when she went to "check on them", but I don't remember if that was explicitly stated.
Drew fucked Eileen, Brenna's old rival, but it appears Eileen was the one who initiated that, in order to get closer to Brenna's family for her own evil plans.
Apparently the worst thing Drew has done is have an affair with David (Ophelia's husband), but there's a lot we don't know about that, so I think it's possible Drew and Ophelia could reconcile and get past it.
Complicit might be too strong a word? Drew was aware, but my sense is that she would show up after Hunter's takeovers, and he probably lied to her about his "need" to drug people (e.g. to neutralize "threats"). If Drew had been doing the seducing, she might not even need to use Hunter's methods.I thought Drew was complicit in the drugging aspect? I remember Drew only drew the line with Hunter when a tranquillizer was used, but was completely fine with aphrodisiacs.
It's wild to see grown men becoming not only possessive (over what is essentially a cluster of pixels) but also emotionally fragile regarding what transpires in-game.Unfortunately applying logic in this won't work. Not even when trying to make them see the flaw in their own.
If you're not "with them", you're a cuck etc etc...
Not as an insult (though I do find it odd). More an observation as to why you lose your shit on the subject.Are the cucks throwing out "self-insertion" as if its some sort of insult, as if its not completely normal.
You draw entertainment from media through empathy, either empathising with the characters or the situation they're in. For you, you favor being in the situation of the guy not doing the fucking.
Oh hell no! We aren't white washing all of Drew's part in this again.Complicit might be too strong a word? Drew was aware, but my sense is that she would show up after Hunter's takeovers, and he probably lied to her about his "need" to drug people (e.g. to neutralize "threats"). If Drew had been doing the seducing, she might not even need to use Hunter's methods.![]()
Agreed, and these drugs are highly sophisticated and completely alter your rational thinking. With some that can selectively alter men or women, example being the nurse not being affected. Drew being aware and taking advantage of Hunter's seemingly billion dollar pharmaceutical empire built on homewrecking makes her irredeemable in my opinion. Its not that Drew is any better, she just lacks Hunter's inhuman ambition to be a sex god.Oh hell no! We aren't white washing all of Drew's part in this again.
When Sterling confronted Drew about the drugs, Drew's surpriced about how hard was Hunter going after Sterling and then he said that what Hunter was doing was for 'level 10 threats' they have a system, Drew knows exactly what drugs to use in what tipe of people. They've been doing that to different families for YEARS, there's blood in Drew's hands just as much as Hunter's.
Think about that word "threats". It doesn't make sense to call a man defending his family a threat. Hunter obviously has no compunctions at all about drugging people, but we know Drew has at least some objections. It's easy to imagine Hunter creating a narrative about "neutralizing threats" just so Drew would cooperate. Remember that Hunter is the mastermind and has been manipulating/brainwashing Drew since childhood. He doesn't tell her everything, only what he thinks she needs to know. Should Drew be smart enough to see through Hunter's lies? Yes, but that's her story arc: finally seeing Hunter for what he is and breaking away from him.Oh hell no! We aren't white washing all of Drew's part in this again.
When Sterling confronted Drew about the drugs, Drew's surpriced about how hard was Hunter going after Sterling and then he said that what Hunter was doing was for 'level 10 threats' they have a system, Drew knows exactly what drugs to use in what tipe of people. They've been doing that to different families for YEARS, there's blood in Drew's hands just as much as Hunter's.
The comment that kicked this off was nothing but insults, with the cuck fans agreeing, so lets not lie. As for lose your shit your doing that thing where you imagine the other side screaming at the screen, I do not imagine you are doing that so common courtesy.Not as an insult (though I do find it odd). More an observation as to why you lose your shit on the subject.
The rest of your post has nothing to do with self-inserting. That's just normal observation of a story.
Well yeah, the idea of preferring to see things from another characters point of view or self inserting as other characters is very common, when they have a character they prefer over the protagonist. Think of the legion of women who self insert as Emma Watson's character from Harry Potter. But if that was the case they would be arguing for things to be for perspective of the character they prefer, if they want more NTR then they want things to be from the perspective of the cuck.What if someone self-inserts as the bull?
What if someone is a sadist who likes to watch the protagonist suffer?
What if someone is a misogynist who likes to watch women cheat to confirm his views on their inherent unfaithfulness?
Your thesis seems to be that the audience has to pick one character to empathize with. I am saying they can empathize with more than one, or even none at all. Why cant you empathize with my point of view?Well yeah, the idea of preferring to see things from another characters point of view or self inserting as other characters is very common, when they have a character they prefer over the protagonist. Think of the legion of women who self insert as Emma Watson's character from Harry Potter. But if that was the case they would be arguing for things to be for perspective of the character they prefer, if they want more NTR then they want things to be from the perspective of the cuck.
What if there were no hypothetical situations?What if someone self-inserts as the bull?
What if someone is a sadist who likes to watch the protagonist suffer?
What if someone is a misogynist who likes to watch women cheat to confirm his views on their inherent unfaithfulness?
![]()
What if they know these things but would be less disgusted by a cuck than someone who's into these things?What if someone self-inserts as the bull?
What if someone is a sadist who likes to watch the protagonist suffer?
What if someone is a misogynist who likes to watch women cheat to confirm his views on their inherent unfaithfulness?
![]()
Don't misunderstand me, I'm not making moral comparisons. I'm merely pointing out that there are other perspectives beyond the naive "alpha/cuck" binary.What if they know these things but would be less disgusted by a cuck than someone who's into these things?
What makes these things better than being a cuck?