- Apr 26, 2017
- 13,287
- 19,805
Actually I think it might have been more fun to not let people know how old Aiden is, leave it up to the player's imagination to determine age, you could probably do the same for all the other 'younger' characters as well. If you remember, Myrian actually allows him to jerk off on her thinking he was just a 'kid'. Not every Country has a legal age requirement of 18. You can get around a lot of the restrictions imposed by not specifying age.For Aiden it was one of the numerous plot line I wanted to explore, notably in the social work, but sadly that might get snipped, though I think try adding another little event with him to have him at least have some naughty content. ^^
For Marc and Nick, yes, there will be some development again, on dom and sub plot lines.
To someone my age, Myriams age....an 18yo is a kid.Actually I think it might have been more fun to not let people know how old Aiden is, leave it up to the player's imagination to determine age, you could probably do the same for all the other 'younger' characters as well. If you remember, Myrian actually allows him to jerk off on her thinking he was just a 'kid'. Not every Country has a legal age requirement of 18. You can get around a lot of the restrictions imposed by not specifying age.
Actually, it makes sense from a certain perspective, but a lot of people went on the opposite direction, it would make perfect sense if instead went the way of having something with the team, though Zorlun may "kill" that to save time.the three of them, or it will eventually expand. Something to discover in the future, I suppose, but personally.. I think it wouldn't make sense if it got expanded to say, Marc's basketball mates.. I believe it could be a bit more interesting if it's something between the three of them.
Well, it acts as a safeguard for Zorlun towards Patreon.Actually I think it might have been more fun to not let people know how old Aiden is, leave it up to the player's imagination to determine age, you could probably do the same for all the other 'younger' characters as well. If you remember, Myrian actually allows him to jerk off on her thinking he was just a 'kid'. Not every Country has a legal age requirement of 18. You can get around a lot of the restrictions imposed by not specifying age.
Yes 18 year olds are kids as far as adults our age are concerned, but Myriam was shocked when she found out Aiden was in fact an adult, if she had realised he was an adult (over 18) she probably would never have let him in her changing room. Bit of an oxymoron really as she lets Marc do stuff pretending to herself that she's only doing because in her eyes he's an inexperienced kid. A bit like when she lets actual kids jerk off over her and then tastes their cum.To someone my age, Myriams age....an 18yo is a kid.
In the UK where the age of consent is 16, not sure about now, but back in the early 80s the UK even allowed 16 years old to appear topless in national newspapers and it seen as OK, other countries have allowed even younger as long as it's not of a sexual nature.But even some countries where the age of consent is below 18, take exception to sexual images of people under 18 or who seem to be under 18, with a such vague formulation, that even if you draw it by hand yourself and have it at home without ever showing it to anybody, and even if it does not really show a sexual act but only e.g. some form of nudity, it would be considered illegal.
Heh...my Myri never let's Marc near her! (except on a couple of saves to see all the content).Yes 18 year olds are kids as far as adults our age are concerned, but Myriam was shocked when she found out Aiden was in fact an adult, if she had realised he was an adult (over 18) she probably would never have let him in her changing room. Bit of an oxymoron really as she lets Marc do stuff pretending to herself that she's only doing because in her eyes he's an inexperienced kid. A bit like when she lets actual kids jerk off over her and then tastes their cum.
In the UK where the age of consent is 16, not sure about now, but back in the early 80s the UK even allowed 16 years old to appear topless in national newspapers and it seen as OK, other countries have allowed even younger as long as it's not of a sexual nature.
UK age of consent for engaging in sexual activity is 16, however you may not be recorded or photographed carrying out sexual activity until over the age of 18. I guess there may be a grey area where topless only may not be considered sexual maybe unless the law was tightened after the heady days of the 80's.In the UK where the age of consent is 16, not sure about now, but back in the early 80s the UK even allowed 16 years old to appear topless in national newspapers and it seen as OK, other countries have allowed even younger as long as it's not of a sexual nature.
That was probably more to do with doing it in the workplace than their ages.UK age of consent for engaging in sexual activity is 16, however you may not be recorded or photographed carrying out sexual activity until over the age of 18. I guess there may be a grey area where topless only may not be considered sexual maybe unless the law was tightened after the heady days of the 80's.
As an example I remember an incident that took place somewhere where I worked (approx 20 years ago) where a girl between the ages of 16 and 18 (given the place I would imagine closer to 18 than 16) was recorded whilst with two guys who would also have been certainly no older than 19. All consensual as far as I am aware but when the video started to get circulated management came down hard as it was technically an illegal video.
Would have been both, but mostly the ages. Even back in this countries heyday...video's of minors was highly illegal, even in the days of page 3. Traci Lord's first few videos were all banned here under the same law, along with her Penthouse shoot. Page 3 really was a moral and legal grey area (Unlike say, Blue Lagoon & pretty baby with Brooke Shields which had similar controversy but were allowed due to artistic licence and specific plot of story and that parents were on set).That was probably more to do with doing it in the workplace than their ages.
I've been deliberately vague but to clarify they weren't in their workplace at the time though they were in accommodation provided by the employer at the time of the recording. I can state it had everything to do with ages as to why 'management' responded the way the did to encourage everyone involved and those to whom it had spread to delete the recordings.That was probably more to do with doing it in the workplace than their ages.
In Blue Lagoon Shields was only 14 at the time and they didn't really show anything of her nudity, the boy was 18 so was perfectly legal to show his dick, Shields had a body double for any actual nude scenes and they probably had to glue her hair over her tits, I think I read somewhere, on close ups.Would have been both, but mostly the ages. Even back in this countries heyday...video's of minors was highly illegal, even in the days of page 3. Traci Lord's first few videos were all banned here under the same law, along with her Penthouse shoot. Page 3 really was a moral and legal grey area (Unlike say, Blue Lagoon & pretty baby with Brooke Shields which had similar controversy but were allowed due to artistic licence and specific plot of story and that parents were on set).
Lies....LIES & SLANDER! *whistles*Anyway, I never said anything about underage porn being legal, in The Sun they were considered 'Glamour' pics, but we all know they were for schoolboys and men to jerk off to in the toilets at school or the workplace.![]()
Technically it's still considered the workplace I guess, as it's accommodation supplied by the employer. But distribution of hardcore porn, at any age, was restricted and in most case illegal.I've been deliberately vague but to clarify they weren't in their workplace at the time though they were in accommodation provided by the employer at the time of the recording. I can state it had everything to do with ages as to why 'management' responded the way the did to encourage everyone involved and those to whom it had spread to delete the recordings.
I thought he was ready made for that social work event. But in his defence, Zorlun has stated previously that not all the characters would get developed significantly. Some of them are just there for one off events, or several relatively minor events which have significance in Myriam's own story. Aiden seems to be one of the latter. His dressing room scene plays a big role in whether Myriam has enough Lust points to get certain sex scenes in the early part of the game.That is unfortunate to know, i was hoping for Aiden in the social work instead of just those random people who were there.![]()
I see, thank you.For Aiden it was one of the numerous plot line I wanted to explore, notably in the social work, but sadly that might get snipped, though I think try adding another little event with him to have him at least have some naughty content. ^^
For Marc and Nick, yes, there will be some development again, on dom and sub plot lines.
Even though there's still a fair amount of development to go, Zorlun recently stated that he will be closing out some routes over the next year and then concentrating entirely on those routes which lead to endings, in other words the LI routes, and one for each kink. He still has to cover the other two social work events, and have more dates, plus the cosplay convention and then close out the routes that won't lead to an ending, all during next year. And that's why some things need to be sacrificed, that originally he may have intended to cover. Having said that, he did suggest there's likely to be some form of further sexual content involving Aiden before the end.I see, thank you.
It honestly saddens me to see that the social work stuff you had planned for Aiden may not come to be, I have to say since the boutique scene he has become the one character really that I want to know more about. He has always had that air of mystery around him that makes him quite an intriguing character, and I would have honestly liked to see where we could make things go with him. Or even simple stuff such as why is he homeless, and other things.
From what you said though, there is still quite a fair bit of development to go through, so maybe down the line you can make your plans become a reality for him. I'll try to remain hopeful, and if it doesn't happen, I'll try to be content with the sexual scenes you make for him
Thanks for replying
Lucy, Crystal, Kimberley & NubiaNever said I wasn't supporting his decision.
It's of course his game and I'm just a simple consumer, so to speak. I wasn't trying to push him to develop Aiden, if it sounded like that, just that it sounded like there might be a possibility that he might get developed. After all, he said: "Might get snipped", so even if there's the very slightest of chances I'll take it heh, and we'll see what happens in the future.
I'm not familiar with what the LI routes are, so if you could enlighten me on that regard, I'd appreciate it.
It is true that there is a fair cast of characters in the game, sometimes it feels like there's way too many. Was checking out all the relationships before and my god, I can't even remember half of all the names I saw in the list XD. I appreciate that Zorlun is taking the time to think which stories will lead to an ending and which ones won't, and motivation is important in game development for sure, I've only been here recently and I've been enjoying my experience with the game for sure, especially because of all of the flexibility it offers.. but it is true that it kind of does leave a bit of a bitter taste to be "teased" with a character that was technically going to play a rather important role in the game and now it may not happen.
It is true that shit happens at times and some things need to be discarded for the sake of development, but I'm sure I must not be the only one who feels the same way about Aiden heh
Whatever the decision ends up being, I'll accept it (and I very much appreciate Zorlun going to lengths to give us some goodbye scenes with Aiden and giving him a sense of closure).
Aiden does appear again and saves Myriam, can't remember offhand if there was a trigger for that scene or not.It honestly saddens me to see that the social work stuff you had planned for Aiden may not come to be, I have to say since the boutique scene he has become the one character really that I want to know more about. He has always had that air of mystery around him that makes him quite an intriguing character, and I would have honestly liked to see where we could make things go with him. Or even simple stuff such as why is he homeless, and other things.
I don't believe there is unless it's tied to the previous scene.Aiden does appear again and saves Myriam, can't remember offhand if there was a trigger for that scene or not.