Yeah, I think for some time travel stories to work you have to accept that inconsistencies in causality from a linear perspective might not be a problem from other perspectives. So it might not be a problem if time traveling back to 1999 is what causes time travel to be invented in the first place.The truth reveal to Jenny in 1999 is one of some major plot devices in the story and that enable other events for sure, but like in all time travel stories there is the "what appeared first, the egg or the chicken?" paradox that always will bring inconsistencies if someone overanalyze it but it is also the main (flawed) reason I love time travel stories so much.
There is so many clues planted by Jestur in between the lines/dialogue and in the renders that I feel like repeating this game over and over to get them all. If weren't the so many games I follow and only existed Ripples around I would repeat it over and over again.
Already did like 4-5 refresh plays from the start since I first played it 2 and half years ago and I'll bet I'll do more when have time available and less games on queue to play. Right now feeling the urge to do it hehe but can't.
Edit: Oh, and here's an extra potential mind fuck:
Assuming my theory is correct about Jackie, what if in 1999, Jackie-Jenny tells Original-Jenny how to invent time travel using knowledge from 2009? Which of course means that her "discovering" time travel is just her future-self telling her how to do it in an endless closed loop.For all we know, now that MC has told Jenny about time travel in 1999, Jackie in 1999 might know that she can now make contact with Jenny without disrupting things, and might explain to her younger self why she still needs to go to the power plant and what happens, etc. That's speculation of course, but nothing would directly contradict something like this.
Last edited: