- Feb 10, 2019
- 1,228
- 3,471
Hey, Prime, you know how when the girls reach a certain inhibition point, when you ask them to suntan, and to take off a layer of clothing like Rogue's hoodie or Kitty's skirt while they have nothing under that, they'll tell you "hey, I'm not wearing anything under that" and you can answer "Ok, that's fine" as to imply they don't have to take it off, but then they do anyways and give you a nice surprise?
I just thought something like that would be pretty nice for when you tell them to skinnydip with not enough inhibition and without the swimsuit option.
You can usually tell them to dip in their underwear, but if they aren't wearing a piece of underwear, they'll give you a negative nevertheless. So what do you think if, with certain conditions met, you can tell them to go in their underwear, they'll imply they don't have any, and something like the +ok, fine -yes, indeed (undresses anyways) triggered? Maybe a generous amount of inhibition/obedience should be given the first time this happens, around 20 or so.
Now that I'm on that subject, why don't you bring back the option for the girls to bathe in their normal clothes? I know it's not very realistic, but it opened up nice interactions.
I just thought something like that would be pretty nice for when you tell them to skinnydip with not enough inhibition and without the swimsuit option.
You can usually tell them to dip in their underwear, but if they aren't wearing a piece of underwear, they'll give you a negative nevertheless. So what do you think if, with certain conditions met, you can tell them to go in their underwear, they'll imply they don't have any, and something like the +ok, fine -yes, indeed (undresses anyways) triggered? Maybe a generous amount of inhibition/obedience should be given the first time this happens, around 20 or so.
Now that I'm on that subject, why don't you bring back the option for the girls to bathe in their normal clothes? I know it's not very realistic, but it opened up nice interactions.
