3.30 star(s) 15 Votes

Kurokazewa

Newbie
Apr 22, 2018
90
282
Yeah censorship is beyond excessive. Tried it once and I'm done. If this is the level of content we can expect going forward I've seen better quality shit on the toilet paper after I wiped my ass. Daniels K had some decent quality games once upon a time but this is a clear sign he's done. Patreon having Uncensored is nice and all but I'll support someone for their quality and creativity. I will never support their greed.
 

Cirdon

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2019
1,252
1,821
So... anything resembling a sex scene is just a black screen telling you to become a patron. Developer obviously uploaded it here themselves as a teaser to get patrons.

There is nothing about what's been uploaded that's worth downloading and playing.

The plot isn't a terrible idea, even if the writing is very ham handed.

Waste your time if you like, the story's almost enough to be a fun time by itself, but the "This is the censored version of Rosewater Manor available to everyone, to access the uncensored version consider becoming a patron at : " in place of every image of sexy times gets irksome fast.
 

Hyperserver

often the biggest step forward is to "step back"
Donor
Jun 30, 2018
2,903
7,710
what should i say?

1 star and not more, as in this censored version ALL lewd scenes (which are basicially the only reason to play at all) are cut out.
So there is no reason left to play this "demo" at all.
Patreons don't need F95 to play - and all over here have no reason to play a game where all important scenes are blacked out.

BLACKLISTED

(i would NEVER EVER support any dev who wants Money in front - i may support AFTER i liked a game, but not like that)
Starting greedy never led to a good end.

PS:
I wonder since when F95 became a commercial advertising site - such content should be removed
 
Last edited:

ZagorTeNay

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
1,202
2,345
He should replace censorship with another round of his "jokes". Hell, that'd be better than any story he can come up with.
 

sergesan

Active Member
Aug 3, 2018
617
1,254
get agitated as you want but at the end there will be allways people who go and support this kinda("money-making")....if noone would play,he couldnt make this attempt to lure us...sooo better ignore this one and maybe he learns something
 
  • Angry
Reactions: jdw6

CamaroFan432

Active Member
Mar 13, 2020
988
2,890
Liked Dusklight Manor and NBP for the girls, even if the writing was half the time cringy. Hated that, after engaging with every girl, the player got forced to choose one girl and see a more than disappointing ending (and that for every girl!). Seeing, that he now tries to "ensure" that his patrons are of legal age by making a censored version for free and uncesored paid one, sorry, but that should not his main goal. This is just a plain dumb excuse to force more people to support him at least on the lowest level, if they want the uncesored version. Probably he won't even read the comments that are here on, but let me write it nonetheless:
STOP THIS BS! You won't archive anything other than just opposite from what you want, less people will be willing to support you! And stop this lazy BS endings! IF you write your game like a harem game, where you're able to pursue one or more girls, then give the people what they want: satisfying endings including one harem ending! You got enough hate in the past for your laziness, learn from it. Until you stop your BS and laziness, I, for one, will never be willing to support you, especially as long as you make this censoring BS!

Just my honest opinion.
 

RogueEagle

Member
Jul 28, 2017
413
395
Censoring it just to get more patreons? yikes!
Sorry, can't even take this game seriously, don't bother posting censored games over here, if you want to make cash post the uncensored version on Steam or just use the patreon version, nobody will bother to even try your games if you cater to censoring games just for extra patreon money, i sign to patreons when they actually see it as a passion and not "in what way can i make people give me money???", good luck with the whole "censoring" theme there...
 

Ragnar

Super User
Respected User
Aug 5, 2016
4,752
12,855
i get that people are hating this game due to censoring , but true his last game had lots of potential but was wasted , but have you seen any dev who is consistent as him? cut him some slack he is greedy true but im sure he will release the public version for all.
He is indeed one of the most prolific devs around, that's why he has more than 1000 patrons right now.
But he's giving a poor ass excuse to keep the uncesored version behind the paywall.
There is also a free censored (Patreon rules) version up for grabs for everyone at this links : . If you think it's worth it you might want to become a Patron (proof of age) to access the uncensored version with all the good erotic stuff.
There are hundreds of uncensored games posted on Patreon free for all.
Why lie? Say you want to give it first to your patrons, that's reasonable.
 

jhustrue

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2020
1,473
2,651
i get that people are hating this game due to censoring , but true his last game had lots of potential but was wasted , but have you seen any dev who is consistent as him? cut him some slack he is greedy true but im sure he will release the completely censored public version for all.
We gonna pretend that anyone would ever want to play one of his games without the porn? It's not one of those games that serves well enough without the adult content and adds an optional 18+ patch down the road. It's one of those games that is completely and absolutely nothing without the porn. Imagine playing any one of his previous games without the adult content. Yeah, that sounds awful, doesn't it?

His excuse for using Patreon as age verification falls flat as soon as you realize that the guy doesn't offer anything but his completely censored public versions to anyone under $10 a month.
 
Last edited:

Turning Tricks

Rendering Fantasies
Game Developer
Apr 9, 2022
946
2,026
I feel that every time F95 allows a censored game on here, or one that has most of the content hidden behind a paywall, that the soul of this forum bleeds a little bit more.

I mean, any site on the internet can be a "Blog" or a click-bait advertising dump. I thought F95 was above all that. It's why I released my game on here. I was a pirate long before I ever made a game.
 

EnterpriseNL

Member
Donor
Aug 16, 2017
466
463
Seeing it censored, it got boring quickly, some black screen with text to ask to subscribe to Patreon for the uncensored one, well no thanks, I must admit that I liked some previous games by Daniel K
 
  • Like
Reactions: ProjectSkywardFan

RogueEagle

Member
Jul 28, 2017
413
395
i get that people are hating this game due to censoring , but true his last game had lots of potential but was wasted , but have you seen any dev who is consistent as him? cut him some slack he is greedy true but im sure he will release the public version for all.
Consistency is one thing, a good enough plot to keep you interested without porn? I don't think so and im not the only on this boat, i would say that more than 90% of people that play his games would say so, as for patreon numbers is not saying much since a lot of people usually forget wich patreon they are even signed on specially when its just a couple of dollars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ProjectSkywardFan

whippetmaster

Active Member
Oct 4, 2018
795
1,123
There's developers who have uncensored demo versions and it's still up. Like Summertime Saga, for example. I'm not sure why Daniels K would try to make it sound like it's Patreon's fault when it's actually fairly easy to verify it. So I logged into Patreon and checked my account's T.O.S and since the last update several months ago, there have been no changes. I re-read it and there is absolutely nothing that requires uncensored games on public links. Also, there is an adult content warning on the landing page and you can't find it unless you type his name in the search bar. When it brings you to the page, there's an adult content warning. Same as it's always been for the last 2 years.
With just a few minutes of checking the Patreon T.O.S, I'm positive that his comment blaming the censoring of the public link on Patreon is complete and utter bullshit. If I was a supporter of this guy, I'd be asking for proof that Patreon requires the "public version or link" to be censored. If you are a patron of his, you need to let the other patrons know that it's HIS rule, not Patreon's. If you do make that comment, I bet you that it will be deleted by him. If any patron is brave enough to attempt telling the truth, let us know how it goes!
 
3.30 star(s) 15 Votes