thanks the reply.
Massive Spoilers in my reply here:
The ending of the game is very purposely written to leave a lot open to the imagination. Fans were very attached to these characters and I felt like putting the power for interpretation in their hands was way more mature and true to the story than me telling people how it ends. While you can interpret it on a very surface-level, I always expected the reader to be more analytical about the story than that never intended for it to be interpreted that way. There's a lot going on in that final chapter and the ending can have some pretty crazy-fun interpretations.
1. Why didn't Zack notice Braden sit down at some point? This question has only come up a few times and I think that's mostly because the bulk of people found it completely believable that Zack wouldn't notice. Why would he? Throughout the entire story, Zack is in his head and is completely oblivious to the real world. It's a black screen or a storm even. He's very introspective and always blocks out the entire world. This is seen in every chapter of the story without exception. But the end is even more complex because he has regret and he's sorta going through his own feelings in real time as he's telling this story-- to me that's another layer of introspection that would block out even more of the real world. So of course he isn't paying attention to anything around him. He's just lamenting because things finally clicked for him and he thinks it's too late while he spills his soul to some stranger.
2. Another fun fan theory is that the epilogue and the train station never happened. If you wanna go a step further, it's completely believable that the epilogue is not actually accurate to what happened. The ending of Chapter 10, without the Epilogue, is a perfect ending to Zack's story. His story was never about the romance, it was about him solving his self-hatred and finding acceptance. Thus, the epilogue isn't even required to tell Zack's story. The Listener, himself, even states that he hopes he does the ending justice and then walks away. He never heard or saw anything after that point and could have just wrote Braden into the story to make it happy. The entire ending could have been fabricated for those readers that want that mindfuck ending and want a lot of depth to an ending. I actually like this ending the best because it turns the whole story upside-down again and gave me a lot to think about for weeks. Obviously, you could still fill in your own happy ending just like the Listener did and still have closure but i do like endings that flip stories every which way and this perspective certainly changes everything.
3. A third interpretation could be that the version of the story we're experiencing is written by the Listener, who also has his own baggage and thus blends himself into Zack's narrative, the same way that a reader of the story could self-reflect on themes throughout the story. Thus, the "Zack" we see in the story is like 50% real Zack and 50% Listener. We already know throughout the story that Zack is an unreliable narrator so who's to say the Listener is and when their characters don't bleed into one another? So if we as a reader were to tell Zack's story after playing the game, we may insert ourselves or own morals into the story to personalize it more. In this regard, the story almost becomes like a legend or a folk tale that changes and morphs over time with every telling as it's passed down.
4. You mention being a "bystander" so I guess your interpretation is that you were the Listener-- but I'm not sure if that's what you're saying or not. If it is, I haven't heard that interpretation yet. That would seem harder to prove since the Listener specifically says that he'll try and tell the story. Which means it would be you writing the story to yourself. I'm not sure if that would track with much of the themes in the story but if you like that interpretation, you're more than welcome to roll with it. I would just see a lot of evidence in the story that would contradict that the player is the Listener. I haven't heard anyone build a case for that one yet but I'm open to it.
In terms of if the story is about me, it's not in so many words. There's a lot of self-reflection and honesty in the writing. I asked myself some hard questions but I'm not one specific character-- if anything my personality is split across the 4 mains. If you want more details regarding that specific question, I'll link some articles on my Patreon that give more personal background
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links