- Dec 9, 2017
- 2,738
- 6,862
forgot the ‘in my opinion part’ there.Whether the people who criticize the game are a minority or not is besides the point, it is moot to the discussion.
It doesn't change the fact that from a game design point of view (and even by adult game standards) Subverse is at best an underwhelming game with many flaws, given the budget and overall production quality.
Most people are simple creatures; you need only see what is popular across different media such as music, games, television, etc to realize that just because the majority of people like something, it doesn't make that something good or above criticism. Nothing is perfect of course and everything has haters and critics who most of the time are a very small minority.
But the point is that even Subverse's the critics are a minority, it is definitely a much more sizeable minority than usual for a piece of media (in a percentage), which in itself speaks volumes and is a testament to the game's design failings, regardless if the majority of people liked the game, because as we established, most people have simple needs and don't have enough knowledge to know when something is flawed.
The conclusion is that the majority of sfow's audience were of people who are into adult videos, and not adult games, so if Subverse happens to be one of your first adult games that you played then it will surely seem like an impressive thing, because the presentation is great. But for people who have more experience with adult games in general, then the sub-par execution is more clear, which consequently generate the displease seen here.
From my own experience played other adult games or not doesn’t really mean that much to the experience here. I’ve played illusion games, rpgmaker games, plenty of VN’s, both in development and fully completed ones, and this just goes above and beyond all of them, which is a good thing.
“The conclusion is that the majority of sfow's audience were of people who are into adult videos, and not adult games”
Yes, and people gave them money for a game. Of which they’re getting.
“Whether the people who criticize the game are a minority or not is besides the point, it is moot to the discussion”
So that there’s people with negative views of the game completely nullifies the positive ones? Your next paragraph seems to imply that the negative reviews are the most important ones, which I think would be a big mistake. That just screams ‘Last Jedi to Rise of Skywalker’ where the negative criticism was taken the most in, and the trajectory of the films went way off track.
There’s plenty of ways to present criticism, there’s many positive posts that also ask for things for the next update. But most of the reviews here are not the kind that a dev would care to read.