KittyMaid

Active Member
Jul 28, 2020
812
977
216
Here I will do the legwork for you of giving context you lack. deiter69 is making a joke about older posts that VValen has been posting in this thread for a long time now. Here are several examples of VValen constantly saying Subverse is not a porn game, but a game with porn in it. [1][2][3][4]

As for Vanilla's comment, idk how someone's opinion on how they feel about something is misinformation. Is their subjective opinion a false statement of how they feel? Or do you just not like the opinion shared?
It's a pointless opinion on something that is already answered. It's like saying "it feels like if this game doesn't have any sex in it" You see how pointless that "opinion" is when it's obvious that it clearly does have sex in it.
 

jscott313

Newbie
Aug 24, 2021
23
126
38
snipping to shorten
Wow that dev log...ouch. Where do you start...basically there's no point to even playing the EA versions anymore since the saves will get wiped before the final version and you'll just have to play the game again from scratch.
Not posting the final cinematic for the devotion quests seals that and adds further credence to the above since you have to replay it anyway...kinda silly considering the entire game gets leaked at places like this within a week of launch generally. I don't see eye to eye with the devs on that; seems like they are needlessly inconveniencing the legit customers.

I'm so glad I never bought this game. :LOL:
 

Redboi8

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2023
1,379
795
237
Oh man, this project is the gift that keep on giving, just not in the way you expect it to. Haven't posted here in a long time, but after seeing how retarded this latest dev log was I just couldn't resist.

So basically, all those devotion scenes FOW have been hyping up for the past several years. the ones they said would blow all the stuff in Pandora out of the water, the ones they said would be similar in quality to their previous movies, the ones they asked their backers to wait for before judging the adult content, etc, etc...will now be inaccessible to those very same backers :KEK: :KEK: :KEK:

Let's look at some of the highest rated feedback in the comments on Steam, shall we?

View attachment 2899542

View attachment 2899545
View attachment 2899547

View attachment 2899548

View attachment 2899549

View attachment 2899551

View attachment 2899552

:KEK: :KEK: :KEK:

Sorry for the screenshot spam, but this stuff is just too funny to miss. What happened to FOW, man? They used to be at the top of the adult animation industry, and look at them now. At this point, I think I'll do exactly what the devs don't want me to do and just wait for the complete scenes to be uploaded online once v1.0 is released...supposedly next year lol. As those people on Steam have mentioned, there is absolutely no point in playing Subverse from now until the release, so might as well just sit back and watch how this unfolds in the next year.
Yeah, everytime I think it can't be any worse, SFOW proves that I underestimate their ability to fuck things up...
 

VanillaLover

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2021
1,053
1,667
286
It's like saying "it feels like if this game doesn't have any sex in it" You see how pointless that "opinion" is when it's obvious that it clearly does have sex in it.
But my comment wasn't about that.
I was talking about how FOW treats Subverse as "a game with porn" than "a porn game" and how most people treat it like the latter. They wanted to take it in the former direction, but most people just bought it for the porn, not for the gameplay.

As for the misinformation, I did talk about any false points. FOW said they wanted to make an "actual game".
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrNewVegas2281

KittyMaid

Active Member
Jul 28, 2020
812
977
216
But my comment wasn't about that.
I was talking about how FOW treats Subverse as "a game with porn" than "a porn game" and how most people treat it like the latter. They wanted to take it in the former direction, but most people just bought it for the porn, not for the gameplay.

As for the misinformation, I did talk about any false points. FOW said they wanted to make an "actual game".
yes a game that revolves around porn. Many games don't do either right, so they wanted to break that sigma by delivering a playable game without hurting the porn quality and blending it with comedy. Still don't see how Witcher ties in. It's the gameplay, theme, story, art, are all different. The only thing they share is the genre of being an RPG.
 
Aug 22, 2023
33
49
18
Can it be that FOW censores negative reviews on the discord?
I never never seen a negative review on the discord, that talks about the problem you can find on this site on the reviews.
 
Aug 22, 2023
33
49
18
yes a game that revolves around porn. Many games don't do either right, so they wanted to break that sigma by delivering a playable game without hurting the porn quality and blending it with comedy. Still don't see how Witcher ties in. It's the gameplay, theme, story, art, are all different. The only thing they share is the genre of being an RPG.
If that was the goal of the developers, then they failed.
For me its a bad game and a bad porn game.
 

Deleted member 324588

Engaged Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,738
6,877
632
If that was the goal of the developers, then they failed.
For me its a bad game and a bad porn game.
Well that’s subjective, so that’s your opinion. But given the game isn’t finished yet and it’s holding at mostly positive on steam with thousands of reviews, I’d say yours is in the minority at this point.
 
Aug 22, 2023
33
49
18
Well that’s subjective, so that’s your opinion. But given the game isn’t finished yet and it’s holding at mostly positive on steam with thousands of reviews, I’d say yours is in the minority at this point.
214141241.png
54% positive on steamdb (10,252 positive and 8,718 negative) and on this site a 2.9/5.
With this kind of rating, nah it's not a good game. When so many people have given it a bad rating/review.

When you are wondering why it is different.
But to make it quick. Steam Store doesn't count reviews from people who activated keys, it only counts the review from people that bought it on steam.

 
Last edited:

Deleted member 324588

Engaged Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,738
6,877
632
View attachment 2903442
54% positive on steamdb (10,252 positive and 8,718 negative) and on this site a 2.9/5.
With this kind of rating, nah it's not a good game. When so many people have given it a bad rating/review.

When you are wondering why it is different.
But to make it quick. Steam Store doesn't count reviews from people who activated keys, it only counts the review from people that bought it on steam.

I hope that's not counting the review bombing it got over the chinese translation kerfuffle.
 

Deleted member 324588

Engaged Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,738
6,877
632
I will say I don't agree with HentaiCut, but considering they started their statement with, "For me..." what follows was always going to be a subjective opinion. Don't know why you need to point that obvious fact out like your the Dude. :KEK:
View attachment 2903948

Vvalen is right however, that ~50% rating is tainted due to the China review bombs making very unreliable as far as gauging overall popular sentiment, that whole situation was out of FOW's control anyway.

But I would say it's inherently flawed to appeal to popularity in either case. Thousands of reviews are just a collection of subjective opinions regardless of which direction they happen to swing, good or bad.
Case in point, what is the need to endlessly argue about something when it isn't even in its final form yet. The biggest thing people seem irritated by is the save wiping, but that isn't a new thing for early access. Baldur's Gate 3 did that as well, and I'm sure there are plenty others.
 

Deleted member 324588

Engaged Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,738
6,877
632
I agree as on the save-wiping, it's standard fair from what I've seen of other games in development, two other examples I've seen shared are Star-Citizen and Escape from Tarkov. I don't think the save wipes are as much a choice they arbitrarily made, as much as just the consequence of a game being in active development, and data under the hood that the saves from older versions might rely on could be altered or removed entirely by the time they reach the end of development.
Considering how many systems they’re going to be changing, let alone all the contextual things they’re adding to all the planets that have just been placeholders “you found ___ TEK/BIO”, it’s gonna be significantly different that an old save just wouldn’t work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrNewVegas2281

GyaruSaki

Member
Dec 20, 2019
249
1,392
257
"REEEEE, WHY AREN'T YOU RELEASING THE FULL EXPERIENCE IN EARLY ACCESS?!" is all I'm reading out of this one. This is like bitching why the Baldur's Gate 3 Early Access didn't have the full experience.
BG3's early access was an early access build of the game for testing
Subverse's Early Access is pretty much the full game with updates as more content has been added. They've been adding full content until now, it's just really dumb that for this one instance they are withholding it, and it more sounds like cope that the cinematics themselves are actually unfinished and won't be until the 1.0 release.
 
2.90 star(s) 312 Votes