SerHawkes
Engaged Member
- Oct 29, 2017
- 3,469
- 15,587
My eyesView attachment 3355850
So many hands and fingers to choose from. How can you not stop your dick reacting to it?![]()
I always pitied the poor bastards walking around with their chin-high stacks of Cobol punch cards. One girl tripped and her entire semester project went all over the room. It probably took her longer to sort the cards back out than to write the actual code.Punch cards and Fortran... The Good Life...![]()
I don't see anyone's leg turning into a seat. One girl stands in front of the motorcycle, leaning on it, the other is behind it. I don’t understand motorcycles and their gas tanks, I’ve been to their exhibition a couple of times, and after what I saw there, this model seems very boring and normal to me.This isn't just an opinion - but if you can't tell her leg morphs into the seat, or the seat is really weirdly rumpled like a leg, and the fuel tank is in too far forward and the wrong scale, completely detached, etc, then you have no eye for depth of field or perspective.
Here you are right, I cannot distinguish a photorealistic picture made by a person from an AI. About 5 years ago, maybe more, employees of our company involved in rendering and 3D visualization used AI. According to them, it was too inconvenient and it was easier and faster for them to do it manually themselves, so they stopped using it. When I looked at their work and the AI, I had no problem seeing the difference. A few years later, our artists decided to use AI again. When I saw his work, I was very surprised. You could sketch out a sketch by hand and the AI would create a project based on it. Now when I look at the work of our artists, I don’t see which part of the project was done by them and which part was done by AI.If you can't tell the difference between AI art and logical physics, you're discussions on all renders are invalid.
Nope, I don't render. It's really obvious to see. When you place a model in a render program, it takes up virtual space. AI doesn't physically model, it just approximates, which is why you can't see where the leg ends and the seat begins, or the hand disappears into the handle, and the tank is not the right scale to the size of the seat. It doesn't connect the objects correctly and the boundaries between objects get confused.I don't see anyone's leg turning into a seat. One girl stands in front of the motorcycle, leaning on it, the other is behind it. I don’t understand motorcycles and their gas tanks, I’ve been to their exhibition a couple of times, and after what I saw there, this model seems very boring and normal to me.
Here you are right, I cannot distinguish a photorealistic picture made by a person from an AI. About 5 years ago, maybe more, employees of our company involved in rendering and 3D visualization used AI. According to them, it was too inconvenient and it was easier and faster for them to do it manually themselves, so they stopped using it. When I looked at their work and the AI, I had no problem seeing the difference. A few years later, our artists decided to use AI again. When I saw his work, I was very surprised. You could sketch out a sketch by hand and the AI would create a project based on it. Now when I look at the work of our artists, I don’t see which part of the project was done by them and which part was done by AI.
Have you been a professional renderer for many years, since you can distinguish human work from AI and you have many of your own renders?
But you should!I don't see anyone's leg turning into a seat. One girl stands in front of the motorcycle, leaning on it, the other is behind it. I don’t understand motorcycles and their gas tanks, I’ve been to their exhibition a couple of times, and after what I saw there, this model seems very boring and normal to me.
I can't see her tits, therefore the new one is: NO GOOD.View attachment 3356740 View attachment 3356731
The first one looks more realistic and the water droplets on her bum looks good. The second image gives a more plastic shine vibe TBH, old AVNs were notorious for it.
I don't care about realism, and I don't care about how water drops on her bum. The only things I care about are attractive characters and a good story.View attachment 3356740 View attachment 3356731
The first one looks more realistic and the water droplets on her bum looks good. The second image gives a more plastic shine vibe TBH, old AVNs were notorious for it.
And to some of us new Mila is a huge improvement. All subjective opinion.I don't care about realism, and I don't care about how water drops on her bum. The only things I care about are attractive characters and a good story.
View attachment 3356815
If you like her new look, that's totally fine. I am happy for you guys.And to some of us new Mila is a huge improvement. All subjective opinion.
New Mila is huge, that's true. Not sure if it's an improvement or notAnd to some of us new Mila is a huge improvement. All subjective opinion.
It's not. OG Mila was perfect. Didn't need any changes.New Mila is huge, that's true. Not sure if it's an improvement or not
No. Objective is new Mila way more better than old Mila. It's my opinion and I'm always right, so it's objective. Case closed.And to some of us new Mila is a huge improvement. All subjective opinion.
I don't see anyone's leg turning into a seat. One girl stands in front of the motorcycle, leaning on it, the other is behind it. I don’t understand motorcycles and their gas tanks, I’ve been to their exhibition a couple of times, and after what I saw there, this model seems very boring and normal to me.
It's not photorealistic, not even close. after a short quick 'n ditrty search I have marked the most obvious things in the picture from your *source* that points heavy to AI.Here you are right, I cannot distinguish a photorealistic picture made by a person from an AI.
ftfyNo. Objective is new Mila way more bigger than old Mila.