BobTheDuck

Well-Known Member
Dec 24, 2018
1,757
9,741
I don't see anyone's leg turning into a seat. One girl stands in front of the motorcycle, leaning on it, the other is behind it. I don’t understand motorcycles and their gas tanks, I’ve been to their exhibition a couple of times, and after what I saw there, this model seems very boring and normal to me.


Here you are right, I cannot distinguish a photorealistic picture made by a person from an AI. About 5 years ago, maybe more, employees of our company involved in rendering and 3D visualization used AI. According to them, it was too inconvenient and it was easier and faster for them to do it manually themselves, so they stopped using it. When I looked at their work and the AI, I had no problem seeing the difference. A few years later, our artists decided to use AI again. When I saw his work, I was very surprised. You could sketch out a sketch by hand and the AI would create a project based on it. Now when I look at the work of our artists, I don’t see which part of the project was done by them and which part was done by AI.
Have you been a professional renderer for many years, since you can distinguish human work from AI and you have many of your own renders?
Nope, I don't render. It's really obvious to see. When you place a model in a render program, it takes up virtual space. AI doesn't physically model, it just approximates, which is why you can't see where the leg ends and the seat begins, or the hand disappears into the handle, and the tank is not the right scale to the size of the seat. It doesn't connect the objects correctly and the boundaries between objects get confused.

Someone doesn't have to be a professional to see the mistakes in that image. If you can't tell, then you will have more enjoyment looking at AI art. But for those of us who immediately want to straighten picture frames when we walk into other people rooms, AI is very disturbing. It passes first glance, but the intentionality and composition is just lacking.

Anyway, discussing the merits of AI art is better done in the appropriate topic as Ocean doesn't use AI.
 

xCalon

Member
Mar 15, 2023
225
921
I don't see anyone's leg turning into a seat. One girl stands in front of the motorcycle, leaning on it, the other is behind it. I don’t understand motorcycles and their gas tanks, I’ve been to their exhibition a couple of times, and after what I saw there, this model seems very boring and normal to me.
But you should!

There is a very impressive, - or I can say - ridiculous gap between the front, and the rear of the motorcycle.

Analyzing the picture, it can be seen that the woman in the foreground is missing her right hand.

Behind the motorcycle's fuel tank is not the motorcycle's seat, but the woman in the background who is sitting on something. If we accept that the woman in the foreground is standing, then she cannot be sitting on the motorcycle's seat at the same time, although based on the picture, she seems to be sitting.

The woman in the fore-, and in the background has basically the same shape and size of the chin. Also, their lips match.

The woman in the foreground is basically an AI generated Ashley Benson.
 
Sep 23, 2021
183
5,393

Mortarion

Well-Known Member
Donor
Oct 22, 2017
1,811
6,736
I don't see anyone's leg turning into a seat. One girl stands in front of the motorcycle, leaning on it, the other is behind it. I don’t understand motorcycles and their gas tanks, I’ve been to their exhibition a couple of times, and after what I saw there, this model seems very boring and normal to me.
Here you are right, I cannot distinguish a photorealistic picture made by a person from an AI.
It's not photorealistic, not even close. after a short quick 'n ditrty search I have marked the most obvious things in the picture from your *source* that points heavy to AI.

All AI renders that I have seen here in the zone have one simple thing in common, and that are wierd(?) faces - not sure if this term is the fitting one.
If you have the muse, take a look here at the games that have AI rendering, you will notice that always the faces are way to perfect, to symetric, to young, or the head is way to much out of scale to fit for the rest of the body. For me needs - till now - just a look at the faces to identify AI art.

1708021794182.png
  1. Wierd back mirror.
  2. Right hand of the chick melts into the handle.
  3. Gas tank way out of scale and morphs into the body of the background gal.
  4. Who is supposed to sit in this tiny backseat, A Baby Born doll?
  5. A second backseat that melts into the hips of the front chick
  6. The faces, always that frigging faces. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAhhhhhh!
 

TIGER ACE

Member
Jan 9, 2019
126
514
Why are people even trying to prove it, its clearly AI , not only but the guy is working with very basic setup, I even know its sd 1.5, not even sdxl. And the reason it looks so bad is because he probably generated in one of those websites and the site's model is old and not good, even a new model of sd 1.5 would look better in every way.
Like the image below is just img 2 img using sdxl, i just did in 20 sec while writing this post , so the technology is already much better than whatever this guy posted. And I only have a 4070TI, with a better card you can do so much more, so just like rendering, even ai images will be better with better models and a more powerful system. Duh you need more VRAM to produce higher resolution images, They just released SD Cascade and its probably going to be even better than sdxl but they recommend a 16-20 GB vram card, because higher resolution will require higher available vram. SdXL produces 1024 resolution images while sd 1.5 does 512. 2024-02-15_13-37-36_5756.png
 
Last edited:

Penfold Mole

Engaged Member
Respected User
May 22, 2017
3,102
7,555
It's not photorealistic, not even close. after a short quick 'n ditrty search I have marked the most obvious things in the picture from your *source* that points heavy to AI.

All AI renders that I have seen here in the zone have one simple thing in common, and that are wierd(?) faces - not sure if this term is the fitting one.
If you have the muse, take a look here at the games that have AI rendering, you will notice that always the faces are way to perfect, to symetric, to young, or the head is way to much out of scale to fit for the rest of the body. For me needs - till now - just a look at the faces to identify AI art.

View attachment 3356965
  1. Wierd back mirror.
  2. Right hand of the chick melts into the handle.
  3. Gas tank way out of scale and morphs into the body of the background gal.
  4. Who is supposed to sit in this tiny backseat, A Baby Born doll?
  5. A second backseat that melts into the hips of the front chick
  6. The faces, always that frigging faces. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAhhhhhh!
There are more.

7. Weird front light. Is it broken, bent inward? WTF?
8. Looks like the engine is right below the front light, between the front shocks and it looks really weird.
9. Looks like the bike only has right side blinkers / turning lights
10. The whole handlebar looks weird and unrealistic

Also, the #5 looks more like the right chick is some kind of a moto-centaur where instead of the front part of the motocycle is her upper body and she has the bike instead of her ass and legs.

It looks creepy and alien, monstrous.

If you have read They Walked Like Men by Clifford D. Simak, this looks like these aliens have tried to copy chicks with bikes as a lure to trap some halfwit guys. Creepy as hell. Burn if with fire, I say!

This is how almost all AI images look to me. Alien fakes from that book I read as a teen the first time.
Loved the book, I literally swallowed it. But it also creeped me out and I had quite a few nightmares. :HideThePain:
Now AI makes those nightmares looking real as fuck.
 
Last edited:
4.30 star(s) 537 Votes