Massagecook01

Member
Oct 6, 2022
282
471
I've spoilered the posts to condense this post a little, also trying to avoid replying too many times.



I love what you've said here. 90% of the anger I've read over this release is people having expectations unfulfilled, they're probing their missing tooth rather than actually looking at what's in front of them. Whether or not the story is a story a player wants to read needs to be on it's own merits, not the merits of what I think I remember from 3 years ago. When I replay the original Ch2, it is cringeworthy. This isn't to say the final version is perfect either, but I'm simply judging/reading/interacting with the final body of work, not the draft.



Again, respect. Getting rid of preconceptions is on of the quickest ways to enjoy life on a wider basis. We all do it subconsciously, so it's hard to judge things as though for the first time. One massive positive for me in my playthrough is the cheeto became an interesting character rather than a gallon of coffee hitting my eyeballs is 1 second flat. I enjoy her humour more now that she's not on 11 the whole time, and there's more colour to her personality.



Well, I had achievements unlock throughout the whole 5 chapters, not sure what you're talking about.



I know some of this has been answered, but it's still pertinent. I downloaded on steam the first hour and the word fuck was throught the game. Fuck machine wasn't, some other dialogues were cut etc. I get what you're saying, but the concept of a fuck machine is going to trigger censors far more than the word fuck or cunt. And it's about percentages. I'm guessing Ocean decided to slim down the swearing to make it a safer percentage, and decided what situations were 'worthy' of exclamations and where is was simply on the gratuitous side. Much the same as cut Nami content - a lot of her topless scenes got edited - because she had maybe more of them, and Ocean tried to get the overall percentage down without losing the ratings game, which he lost anyway. So sure, unnecessary in the end, but his intent was not to affect players but to get under a certain limbo bar.



I think part of this is due to recent patreon purges, and being careful to assure some form of security for the game going forward. He now has a separate revenue stream that isn't dependant on patreons fast shifting policy changes. That's objectively a good thing. The process he went through to do that? Well, it's actually his first time. The remaining releases aare all 18+ from this point, so I kinda see this release as a demo for Ocean's whole planned universe. Could it be better? Absolutely. Could more be restored? Absolutely. Do I want him to spend any more time on season 1? Absolutely not, and I think the patrons just want to see more of season 2 where Ocean can move forward without his self imposed restrictions.



I seem to remember you having a redhead from another game for your profile pic, so taken that you have a subjective like for redheads, in particular Nami in this case, could your disappointment be due to the content you are most aligned to (Nami's) had the heaviest editing? As far as definitions go, people are saying things like "there are no boobs!" etc because the boob image they subjectively liked the most from the beta or ch4 is missing. So the whole objective argument is a false one - we're all subjective based on our perception and biases. Seeing we can't find common language in the tread, communication is hard when adult means different things to different people. Trying to be objective about language will just lead us further towards Wittgenstein and further from AVN's and we'll debate whether a symbol is even a symbol or just pixels, and one person's perception of those pixels is ....eh. I just vomited at my own words just now.

What I do like is that by raising the issue you're forcing people to articulate what their actual opinion is. That's a definition that matters. Too many people in the thread believe what other people say rather than making their own opinion.







I'll reply to this one, but I'm referring to a bunch of your posts regarding double dipping. The real question is whether OCean has been up front to his patrons through this process, and whether they've stood by the changes. This is the first major change in Ocean's business model - ie diversifying income. As patreon becomes less viable for DAZ/renpy devotees, moving forward Ocean has to work out how to ensure income to keep working. Let's ignore the content and just look at the business decision: Ocean lost the WiaB patreon, with no right of reply. If he loses the SG one, what happens to these two games? Currently he's still going ahead with both. He needs to stabilise his income or he will suffer massive setbacks (especially as he now has monthly leases to pay on the video cards etc). Getting the steam release out and being overly cautious about it makes sense. It doesn't satisfy what people have been hoping for, but some steam purchasers have no history with the game and are playing it for the first time. It's been out for less than a week, and it's doing pretty okay. This means Ocean has a buffer zone for whatever patreon might do.

Regards the content and double dipping: that's literally up to the individual. I'm not a patron for any games, because that's not something I'm willing to do. I might do a kickstarter or one off, but that's it. Other people are patrons not to buy the game on each release but to support the project through all the boring phases where there are no releases. Why support then? So there can be a release. If they decide to buy the steam version as a one off to increase their support, well, it's their money. As a non patreon, I read the devlogs here and knew this was how it was going to be a long time ago. Ocean was clear to his patrons about the release. Us arguing about their wallets when we get the fruit of their patron money - literally we can't pirate without patrons supporting the devs. The very hands that feed our pirate sponging are the patrons. On a grander scheme, if we attack the patrons, our leaks dry up.

We like to pretend we're pirates, but we're actually sponges. The patrons are the ones uploading the games to this site, despite having paid. So I really don't think arguments about double dipping are pertinent - we're getting releases for free because patrons don't give a shit about their money and throw us crumbs.

I can download like a sponge, I can't sail the high seas and liberate even one game from patreon on my own.



Despite how long the dev cycle has been, it's also important to remember that this is the first 'comercial' release Ocean has done. I agree that he failed to deliver everything that people wanted or expected, but if he learns and we see the improvements in WiaB's release and SG Season 2, I think the trajectory will be clear. I still have a ton of other AVN's I've yet to play while waiting. WiaB being the next major release will be a good litmus test - if it is released on steam intact, we'll know that Ocean is capable of doing an 18+ release without triggering steam, without second guessing steam.
yeah i agree i'm gulity of downloading games on this website that patreons uploaded so who am i to say anything right ? it's only right to support and talk well of the pateons that give us for free for what they pay right is right wrong is wrong every day of the week. it's wrong of us to talk down to the patreons that care enough or don't care enough that they upload to this website so we can enjoy the same game as them. so in that aspect they get all the praise.
 

Mr_Mister

Member
Jan 9, 2020
211
576
Yes, I get that you have your opinion which is fine and all, but just because a definition doesnt fit your opinion, it doesn't mean it's "subjective"... When we say "AVN", no one thinks of... I dunno, Telltale's Walking Dead games... we all think "bewbs". Definitions exist for a reason, you can't go around saying "dog" expecting people to understand "cat" just because in your opinion dogs and cats are house pets with 4 legs and a tail and they both lick their balls and therefore they're pretty much the same.



Ah yes, AVN "romance" :ROFLMAO:

Honestly, it's kinda why I like Nami the most, there's at least a long term relationship between the two, so it makes things a hell lot more "believable"... you know, minus the whole incest thing of course...
giphy2.gif
 

BobTheDuck

Engaged Member
Dec 24, 2018
2,150
12,680
yeah i agree i'm gulity of downloading games on this website that patreons uploaded so who am i to say anything right ? it's only right to support and talk well of the pateons that give us for free for what they pay right is right wrong is wrong every day of the week. it's wrong of us to talk down to the patreons that care enough or don't care enough that they upload to this website so we can enjoy the same game as them. so in that aspect they get all the praise.
I'm out of reactions otherwise I'd be smashing the like button on your post. I grew up with a background in art history, so I do consider the whole concept of patronage from the angle of rich people providing food and board like a retainer, so they could get a composer to write something for their daughter's 18th birthday, their wedding anniversary etc. The modern concept of it being directly linked to the reward rather than being completely speculative is a change in the intent, but I think in practice it's good to remember that being a patron is about supporting what you believe in, not paying for a service. In such a context throughout history, no artist has ever delivered 100% what their patrons initially wanted, but over time, history has shown that patronage has moved culture forward. When the majority of culture is downloadable without payment, creators like Ocean have to work hard to justify themselves to the bank and their landlords while they chase a goal of creating something with very uncertain returns.

Consider the steam returns - if you spent 5 years making a game without patrons, would the current level of sales pay off the loans you had for the past 5 years? Of course not. SG and WiaB do exist because of patrons, so whatever I justify, they're the reason I can play and either complain or enjoy any of these games at all.
 

Massagecook01

Member
Oct 6, 2022
282
471
I'm out of reactions otherwise I'd be smashing the like button on your post. I grew up with a background in art history, so I do consider the whole concept of patronage from the angle of rich people providing food and board like a retainer, so they could get a composer to write something for their daughter's 18th birthday, their wedding anniversary etc. The modern concept of it being directly linked to the reward rather than being completely speculative is a change in the intent, but I think in practice it's good to remember that being a patron is about supporting what you believe in, not paying for a service. In such a context throughout history, no artist has ever delivered 100% what their patrons initially wanted, but over time, history has shown that patronage has moved culture forward. When the majority of culture is downloadable without payment, creators like Ocean have to work hard to justify themselves to the bank and their landlords while they chase a goal of creating something with very uncertain returns.

Consider the steam returns - if you spent 5 years making a game without patrons, would the current level of sales pay off the loans you had for the past 5 years? Of course not. SG and WiaB do exist because of patrons, so whatever I justify, they're the reason I can play and either complain or enjoy any of these games at all.
i see your point very well, a lot of people sponge on not only games from developers but music from artist and tv shows and movies, you can't complain if you aint out no money i believe you have no reason because it's not costing you anything in the first place, instead of crying about what you don't have , like updates and such on a game like summers gone spend that time to appreciate what you have for free that others pay for. it's only right.
 

BobTheDuck

Engaged Member
Dec 24, 2018
2,150
12,680
i see your point very well, a lot of people sponge on not only games from developers but music from artist and tv shows and movies, you can't complain if you aint out no money i believe you have no reason because it's not costing you anything in the first place, instead of crying about what you don't have , like updates and such on a game like summers gone spend that time to appreciate what you have for free that others pay for. it's only right.
100% agreed. Now if only mods here would give us more likes.... :coffee::whistle:
 

Jacowboy

Active Member
Aug 8, 2022
811
955
I seem to remember you having a redhead from another game for your profile pic, so taken that you have a subjective like for redheads, in particular Nami in this case, could your disappointment be due to the content you are most aligned to (Nami's) had the heaviest editing? As far as definitions go, people are saying things like "there are no boobs!" etc because the boob image they subjectively liked the most from the beta or ch4 is missing. So the whole objective argument is a false one - we're all subjective based on our perception and biases. Seeing we can't find common language in the tread, communication is hard when adult means different things to different people. Trying to be objective about language will just lead us further towards Wittgenstein and further from AVN's and we'll debate whether a symbol is even a symbol or just pixels, and one person's perception of those pixels is ....eh. I just vomited at my own words just now.

What I do like is that by raising the issue you're forcing people to articulate what their actual opinion is. That's a definition that matters. Too many people in the thread believe what other people say rather than making their own opinion.
Well I've never had a profile picture in this site, and if I ever do it'll be the same one I use everywhere else (which is my dumbshit mug), sooooo... nope. That said, yes I do like Nami the best in this game, and yes, those cuts bummed me out, but every other single cut shot/scene bummed me out equally, including the MC's shitty ass penis, because it's more of a principle kind of thing.

Also, I think I've posted enough long-winded wall texts where I clearly laid out the full extent of my criticisms, which are not just constrained to a few missing boob shots.

Also also, I know you love taking some argument points and running wild with them into tangents, but don't mix an answer I gave to a particular topic (the thing about "subjectivity") with a whole other topic (specific censored content) I previously talked about... you're just muddying the argument(s) and putting words in my mouth.

No need to go balls-deep into philosophy here, common sense will do just fine: AVNs are porn games... if your game is no longer a porn game, then we can't really call it an AVN now, can we? (not that I'm saying SG is no longer a porn game, but there IS an argument to be made)

See? No need for Wittgenstein.

And yes, "adult" can mean whatever you want to you or to someone else, but that doesn't matter... for example, I deeply despise that people use dumbshit and confusing weeb terms like "NTR" for cucking, or "kinetic" for choiceless, etc... but guess what? That's the convention the people in this community agreed on, and for better or worse, that's what we're stuck with... that's how shit works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobTheDuck

DuckDairyDip

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2018
1,060
1,481
Almost every AAA AVN on this site with very risque (questionable) lewd content is on Steam with zero issue, making gobs of monetary gain which Steam gets a cut of. You know this, right? I still don't believe this has anything to do with Steam at all... but that's opinion, I'm just expressing it.
I am well aware. I am talking about in general and not exactly this particular situation as that has been an issue for some developers/publishers, but it isn't like some don't get banned. As I said, I doubt it will be an issue for Ocean moving forward, just saying it isn't like this doesn't happen fairly often.
 

minibaer12

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2023
1,166
1,815
Same it will take alot for me to consider this a porn game even when sex does happen. As for me to consider this a porn game the porn aspect has to be the main focus. Being an AVN doesn't mean it's automatically a porn game for me.
Sorry, but my MC doesn't have the time or the muse to "make out" with some girl!

There are so many puzzles to solve in this game that my fingers on both hands can't reach. I have made it my mission to research and solve these.

And yet I still feel very entertained and enjoy the amazing graphics and musical accompaniment.
 

yossa999

Engaged Member
Dec 5, 2020
2,797
18,785
You guys still haven't grasped the game we've been playing here for five years?

Summer's Gone is PORN ??? ...
View attachment 3636100
Nah, they don't understand why he don't want make it porn right here, right now. This has been disrupting their acid-base balance for several years. And if there is no porn in it, it does not deserve the prefix Adult.

You know I trust the judgment of this thread with all my heart! They don’t lie or make mistakes here. But I'll be damned if I'm going to show this game to my five year old nephew because someone in this thread doesn't think SG is an adult game.

And of course, no one in their right mind would listen to just some author of this game who defines it as:
"This isn't a porn game! This is a story-focused game with adult elements."

As if he knows something about this.
 

xCalon

Member
Mar 15, 2023
246
996
You guys still haven't grasped the game we've been playing here for five years?

Summer's Gone is PORN ??? ...
View attachment 3636100
It's way more comfortable to whine and/or complain about something that wasn't even in Summer's Gone, and hysterical about it for dozens of pages, rather than simply admitting certain things.

Still, many people have come into this topic and wrote factually untrue things. They play the "I know everything better" instead of playing this AVN, and if they don't like it they would quietly leave. But no, they stay, and crying about almost everything.

Summer's Gone Season 1 is flawless? Obviously not!
Summer's Gone Season 1 is a porn game? Obviously not!
Could Summer's Gone Season 1 be any better? Hell yes!

I have to say, I have to agree with one of Miss Marla's question:

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 

minibaer12

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2023
1,166
1,815
Nah, they don't understand why he don't want make it porn right here, right now. This has been disrupting their acid-base balance for several years. And if there is no porn in it, it does not deserve the prefix Adult.

You know I trust the judgment of this thread with all my heart! They don’t lie or make mistakes here. But I'll be damned if I'm going to show this game to my five year old nephew because someone in this thread doesn't think SG is an adult game.

And of course, no one in their right mind would listen to just some author of this game who defines it as:
"This isn't a porn game! This is a story-focused game with adult elements."

As if he knows something about this.
I don't really want to sign your statement. There is actually, admittedly, a very rare species that looks for exactly these games. And SG is one of them for me.
 
4.30 star(s) 549 Votes