- May 22, 2017
- 3,278
- 8,358
Or that. Anything but what John thought about it.At that point did she tell her mom was a prostitute to Nika if not then maybe that was it. "I have a prostitute for a mom"
Or that. Anything but what John thought about it.At that point did she tell her mom was a prostitute to Nika if not then maybe that was it. "I have a prostitute for a mom"
At that point did she tell her mom was a prostitute to Nika if not then maybe that was it. "I have a prostitute for a mom"
My guess is "I have a baby" or "I have a baby sister that I have to take care of" or something like that.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
The, "And" kinda discounts her saying "I have a- prostitute for a mom." However, she could have been about to talk about her step-father.
thanks I wasnt sure if she had told him yet.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
The, "And" kinda discounts her saying "I have a- prostitute for a mom." However, she could have been about to talk about her step-father.
Nah, the original and genuine English language text in the Beta version of Ch 5 said nothing of the sort.I noticed a very interesting thing about the Ocean. In version A, phrases appear that disappear in version B. They are very similar to hints. So, in Part 3A of "Vibes", Monica, talking to Abigail, calls Willie and Leah her best friend's offspring. In Part 3B this phrase was changed and the word “generation” was removed.
Also in part 5A of SG in the book club, Jenna says to Nika: “Our Sasha is being beaten at home... Oops, Princess ZPR is being beaten? Maybe we should think about whether she is such a princess? In version B this phrase disappears. You might want to think about what "sparring" is. Sashi and Ayuya?
I don't know what the 'a' is, but considering she mentioned her mother being prositute, Mila's being pretty transparent. That means that whatever she was about to reveal is about her specifically, not about her mom or her mom's boyfriend/s and far more personal. I also think it's unlikely to be something negative. Context is that she's sharing personal things and even dreams, this whole 'getting to know you vibe' It's not 100% her getting things off her chest. Some of it has been sharing dreams, so why not something positive?You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
The, "And" kinda discounts her saying "I have a- prostitute for a mom." However, she could have been about to talk about her step-father.
Curious, I really don't recall these lines in either the Beta or the Full. You'd have to find the line in the script for me to talk further - I kept the ch4.5 version, but deleted the ch5 beta when I got the steam version, so I can't check any more. Edit: I see John's already mentioned this:I don't play fashion. I only play the original game. And I said that Jenna’s phrase about Sasha was only in version A. In version B it disappeared. I think Ocean thought it was premature.
Now what I wonder is, what if Whitecat's enjoyment of the story is actually more than mine because of the translation, if that is indeed the case? That would be an interesting idea, that the story could be more elaborate (unintentionally) in another language.Nah, the original and genuine English language text in the Beta version of Ch 5 said nothing of the sort.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I have no idea what you are playing, but it's NOT the English-language Ch 5 Beta (there is no such thing as "5A").
Here are the current UNOFFICIAL translations available on F95:
Russian:
"Знаешь... К нашей драгоценной Саше часто подкатывают."
"You know... Our precious Sasha is often approached."
Turkish:
"Biliyor musun... Kıymetli Sasha\'mız çok darbe alıyor."
"You know... Our precious Sasha takes a lot of hits."
German:
"Weißt du... Unsere liebe Sasha wird oft angemacht."
"You know... Our dear Sasha gets hit on a lot."
Can you reproduce the quotes from the script?
Fashion???I don't play fashion. I only play the original game. And I said that Jenna’s phrase about Sasha was only in version A. In version B it disappeared. I think Ocean thought it was premature.
I have assets that will increase after each update.My guess is "I have a baby" or "I have a baby sister that I have to take care of" or something like that.
I have the same problem. I gave up.Anyone knows how to get these gallery images?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
The fact that he is her boyfriend's father and they share the same social circle that will definitely be affected by this news. The fact that this news will embarrass her in front of her and Mario's friends, her classmates, her father, her sister. These are the obvious consequences that immediately come to mind. But who cares that she slept with the father of her boyfriend, right? She should just cut off all her old contacts, move to a different city and start a new life. Anyway she will be fine. Easy-peasy.Stop, stop. Firstly, I don’t really understand what exactly will ruin Vanessa’s life, sex with an older man? It would even be interesting to watch. I still don’t see any arguments in favor of leaving everything as it is, folding my paws and ending up living with an asshole who strokes his daughter’s hand while hitting on her mother. As for Vanessa, neither you nor I have a good picture of what kind of person this is and what his motives are. It's simply not in the text of the season, so naturally my assessment is based on its manipulation.
Separately, I will note that you instantly gave the label to Brenda, probably because her husband cheated on her and she acutely perceives reminders of this.
Is this assessment, like, better than Bella's assessment of Holgerson? Ok then.
I wouldn't apply the same rules to Vanessa simply because I (as Nika) don't know she's cheating. In the example also you (as a player) can't know she was cheating when you decided to set her up. You didn't play the game backwards, from chapter 5 to chapter 1.Why do I need another argument for myself?
This is something like a game of deep psychology, if I understand correctly. Then everything is much simpler - I don’t like arrogant people who pose an existential threat.
Let's assume the situation. You want to take some action, for example, climb the career ladder. Someone else is standing in your way, well, competition for a place. You know that your opponent is cheating and decide to set him up or simply tell management about exactly how he does it so that the place becomes yours.
But you have never seen this person before and here is your first meeting. On what basis might your opinion change (or, conversely, remain the same)?
I suspect you'll apply the same rules I apply to Vanessa. And you will absolutely not care about the shape of her ass or the presence/absence of heterochromia.
So my opinion is based on a couple of scenes at the end of the season and I didn't like it at all. In a short dialogue while changing clothes, she literally tries to get into the protagonist’s head, which would also cause antipathy in me.
In the context of the dialogues written by the author, Nika’s reluctance to continue what she had planned with Vanessa was dictated, in my opinion, by something else. Getting used to Bella's company.
But you can interpret this differently. Only in my opinion this is obvious.
Everything is indeed simple. All three of them are manipulators.Everything here is so simple that it’s strange to discuss it in a serious conversation. He simply has more screen time in the season (probably this has something to do with the fact that Nika is the protagonist).
What's the point of your example? An antihero describes the general characterization of a character and their role in a story, not their personality. They don't necessarily have to be reasonable or emotional. They're all different. Antiheroes are not created to try to justify them.But this is interesting, by the way.
I can give you an example of an anti-hero driven by logic and skill, whose actions are reasonable and deliberate, whose goal is likely to be largely justified. The so-called "ambiguous" anti-heroes.
Good Philadelphian Clyde Shelton.
Remember who it is? I strongly doubt that you will be able to justify his actions from the point of view of law and logic (although it depends on whose), but hardly from the point of view of morality.
You sure don't.The point is that I don't need to justify anyone. I can either understand and accept the action/character or I can’t. There is no additional subtext here, I don’t like those people who deliberately do crap knowing what it will lead to.
Or maybe it’s much simpler, they know that it was Bella.I wonder which Holgerson Bella had in mind when she painted graffiti on the car, the car was rather Mario, but maybe she knew that Stefan would also see it. If it's Stefan, then we can speculate that maybe he paid underage girls to have sex with him and this way the trail may lead to Milla and her mother and this may be the reason why they accused Milla so quickly because they knew that she knew about Stefan's perversions and they think that graffiti was her work
Or maybe she just means that she has had to hear and see people having sex since she was a little girl
Maybe we can exclude the possibility that Mila has a baby, if we accept her reply to Nami's question in CH4.5:I don't know what the 'a' is, but considering she mentioned her mother being prositute, Mila's being pretty transparent. That means that whatever she was about to reveal is about her specifically, not about her mom or her mom's boyfriend/s and far more personal. I also think it's unlikely to be something negative. Context is that she's sharing personal things and even dreams, this whole 'getting to know you vibe' It's not 100% her getting things off her chest. Some of it has been sharing dreams, so why not something positive? (...)
You know why dialogue boxes with a choice of lines sometimes appear in such games? You know, right? Otherwise, it’s easier to make a mini-series than to mess with the engine and code.The fact that he is her boyfriend's father and they share the same social circle that will definitely be affected by this news. The fact that this news will embarrass her in front of her and Mario's friends, her classmates, her father, her sister. These are the obvious consequences that immediately come to mind. But who cares that she slept with the father of her boyfriend, right? She should just cut off all her old contacts, move to a different city and start a new life. Anyway she will be fine. Easy-peasy.
I've already given you the argument. Amber is a mature, educated woman who is also a psychologist. She can handle this asshole who it's not even safe to say actually lusts after her. And we never saw him hitting on her.
I didn't gave Brenda any labels, Bella gave her labels. She said Brenda would be easy to manipulate, she said Brenda was innocent.
You are shifting focus from their perspective that I gave in the paragraph you quoted to our perspective. It doesn't matter what picture of Vanessa you created in your head at the end of the game, this was originally about how Nika and Bella see her before Nika meets her and why exactly he decided to abandon the plan with her. We can't judge the characters' actions by bringing in their defense information they didn't know or consider when they committed their act. Follow the internal game logic. By doing the opposite, you create a false picture of their motives and the reasoning they make up for themselves at a particular moment.
Why should I skip the game through reverse? Do you have a superpower for rewinding time? If we are talking about the player rethinking the plot, yes, this can be done. But only if half of the decisions do not lie with you, through those very dialog boxes.I wouldn't apply the same rules to Vanessa simply because I (as Nika) don't know she's cheating. In the example also you (as a player) can't know she was cheating when you decided to set her up. You didn't play the game backwards, from chapter 5 to chapter 1.
Vanessa wasn't even cheating in the first place when Nika and Bella came up with their plan. She was probably sitting in Starbucks, drinking her cappuccino when some blonde approached her and offered to become her friend with malicious intentions. She didn't invite Bella, she didn't even care at all about her and Nika.
Your entire argument comes down to her being an arrogant manipulator with unknown intentions. Meanwhile, we have two arrogant manipulators with known, obvious evil intentions who see her as the same easy victim as Brenda (don't forget about their perspective).
Who said anything about excuses? Why is it so flat?What's the point of your example? An antihero describes the general characterization of a character and their role in a story, not their personality. They don't necessarily have to be reasonable or emotional. They're all different. Antiheroes are not created to try to justify them.
As for Nika and Bella, they are classic 100% antiheroes.
Anyway...
You're talking about justice for Nika and Bella with absolutely no regard for the people who get screwed by them. You could have just said, "Fuck the Holgersons, fuck Brenda, fuck Vanessa. I just like Bella and I like Nika." Instead you're practicing some pointless mental gymnastics calling it "flexible morality". Even a flexible morality should have some rules attached to it, some order that applies to all characters. Including Bella and Nika. But all your flexibility is focused only on getteing their asses out of the hit.
Let me emphasize: consciously, and not through the prism of a reverse, repeated passage.You sure don't.![]()
My guess is "I have a baby" or "I have a baby sister that I have to take care of" or something like that.
Mila was most likely gonna tell Nika about her violent father, who could be an alcoholic like Penfold says.I've always thought that Mila was about to say something like "I have a shitty family", "I have a father who's an alcoholic" or something like that. But my guess isn't any better than yours and I kind of like this twist. While it may seem outlandish at this point, it gives a good reason to a seemingly random hostility of Holgerssons against Mila.![]()
Yeah, or maybe she's gonna say he's in prison.Mila was most likely gonna tell Nika about her violent father, who could be an alcoholic like Penfold says.
View attachment 3762792
She might be afraid of basketball because her father throws stuff at her, presumably bottles after he has drunk.