DrakoGhoul
Engaged Member
- Jul 13, 2018
- 3,466
- 13,379
My original comment wasn't misleading. Her age doesn't matter at all. I corrected you by saying she's 14 when you thought, in your "clarification", she was in her late teens and that it happened in highschool. When in fact it happened in middle school.Your most up to date quotes work just fine:
===
It is the same thing.
"X is a child murderer" is saying the same thing as "X murdered a school full of children"
Actually if anything "X is a child murderer" is a slightly more tame statement.
As your actual wording is more of "X is a child mass murderer"
specifying which specific children (school children) does not make a meaningful difference to the statement
A. Misattributing childhood to the victim of murder is pretty damn huge thing.
B. You also conveniently omitted the part where ella was the same age as them.
And I didn't "twist it just to argue with you". I pointed out that your original statement is misleading because <insert clarification>. Because it is misleading, not because I just want to argue.
If you genuinely thought your original statement was fine as is then there would not even be an argument.
Nothing stopping you from just letting my clarification stand as is.
Why is it so threatening to you that I clarified Ella was 14 at the time?
C. Also, while we are at it. you keep on saying "an entire school". but it was actually more like a single classroom's worth.
Once again, I didn't label Ella anything. Saying she massacred a school full of children says nothing about what Ella's labelled as besides evil. You jumped to those conclusions yourself to put that title on her head just to argue my point from that angle.
I didn't "conveniently" left out her age. Her age doesn't matter at all and I'm the one who corrected you on it by telling you her exact age. It doesn't matter if you changed Ella'a age to 100, 57, 39, 22, 10, 4 or even 1. The group that would have been killed by them would still be classified as a group of children. Which was my point. It doesn't matter who did it, it would still be a group of children being killed. The only thing I may have got wrong was them still being considered children still at 13 to 14.
You on the other hand tried twisting my point by bringing up something as irrelevant as "technically a child murderer has to be an adult to be considered that" when I never said Ella was a "Child Murderer" in the first place. I've called her Evil. It literally doesn't changed that a group of children died. It doesn't make what she did any less messed.
"Nothing stopping you from letting my clarification stand" that goes both ways, you know? There's nothing stopping you from letting my post stand as well but here we are.
"Why is it so threatening to that I clarified Ella's 14". Eh, what? In fact, I corrected you for thinking she was older than 14 in the first place. Her age doesn't matter at all.
As for your C point, I overlooked it. That's all.
Ah, that's good to know. So it doesn't change that it was a group of children was killed. Meaning my point still stands.I don't see any misrepresentation there. Someone under the age of majority or not yet an adult IS a child...that's one of the basicYou must be registered to see the linksof the word. I don't think there's any indication that in the world of Superhuman children legally or socially become adults at super young ages. OK, Michael's family probably views adulthood as starting from age 5 or so, but they're clearly presented as a fringe case in the game.
What all this argumentation isn't preparing us for is the inevitable retcon that will reveal Ella was actually trying to save the children (in fact, ALL children) the whole time. I'll definitely want an "Ella is still evil/morally complex" mod if WeirdWorld does that to us.
Also, I doubt she tried to save them. That kind of retcon would be a bit out of character. Even during those scenes, she seemed a bit crazy.