- May 8, 2018
- 4
- 6
I will never understand why a developer with a large amount of payers would go back and redo old content. Especially spend this amount of time doing so without injecting some new stuff along the way or a metric fuckton of new content (not redone) in the final "redone" edition drop.
The *current* payers are not paying for the old content. They already played it. They are paying for the new content the developer is theoretically working on. Maybe if your game has very little support and the beginning makes a bad first impression, then I could see a redo. But this game did not suffer from that.
Taking your *current* large amount of payers for granted and focusing on potential future payers seems like a fools errand to me, but I guess most of the *current* payers will continue their support and no one (developer or payer) will ever learn a lesson from this.
The *current* payers are not paying for the old content. They already played it. They are paying for the new content the developer is theoretically working on. Maybe if your game has very little support and the beginning makes a bad first impression, then I could see a redo. But this game did not suffer from that.
Taking your *current* large amount of payers for granted and focusing on potential future payers seems like a fools errand to me, but I guess most of the *current* payers will continue their support and no one (developer or payer) will ever learn a lesson from this.