I think I realize what is the problem here. You have zero understanding of basic English grammar. So lemme try to help you.
If there is one particular poison that your enemies frequently use, it would be dumb as fuck to build a resistance to any other.
Much like snake venom, they won't give you anti-venom for a different toxin, it would be worthless. They'll give you anti-venom for the one you were injected with.
"If there is one particular poison your enemies frequently use." IF there is one.
But that itself makes a lot of problems. Everyone can pretty much poison anyone anytime and it would be an easy kill to do so with a lot of deniability.
If actually there is a one particular poison every single family uses, then sure it does make sense and you are right. Then wouldn't everyone try to build some sort of resistance making the poison useless. Why risking getting poisoned by something that has a lot of deniability.
Or if one particular family uses that poison then they would easily be detected or easily framed.
Again I am not putting any false narrative I am using common sense. If it's wrong it's wrong.
Common sense definition; Good sense and sound judgement in practical matters. To translate it, it means something that should be normal knowledge.
Or DeLucas are just overconfident as fuck. Then I am absolutely wrong about everything I said, but I like to think they aren't.
Did you not pay any attention to the story? His Mother (& presumably his Father) were OG Serpents.
Of course they're going to keep an eye on the offspring, to see if he develops any worthy talents.
They do not need to do home intrusion, to achieve that.
It's not rocket science.
It is not rocket science as you said, but is it so hard to believe they did in fact look at least once? I am not saying they did I am saying that it is possible they did.
Because he was.
It does not mention the level of intrusion they went to & the only evidence is of them standing in a park, watching a spat between school-children.
There is zero evidence of them knowing what went on inside his home.
His Mother is an ex-Serpent. She also seems rather paranoid & mentally disturbed.
Do you really think they're going to want to piss her off?
"There is zero evidence of them knowing what went on inside his home." Yeah you are right on that one, and I just made an educated guess based on the fact that The Serpent monitored her, without any problems I assume, so yeah I think they would do that.
But lemme give you another lesson of English grammar.
I believe Wilfred or Giltard (the Wilfred Division leader) said "He was monitored ever since he was a child." or "He has been monitored ever since he was a child."
First is past tense in passive voice, but since here we had "ever since" it means something was done from that point into the past up until a certain point into the future.
Second one is present perfect continuous, which means a certain action was done from that point into the past up until present time.
It is basic grammar not bullshit narrative.
"She also seems rather paranoid & mentally disturbed." Where did you get that information? Would YOU really as a voice of reason stoop so low to make up some random bullshit to fit your narrative?
Serpent certainly monitored her, so yeah I think they would piss her off.
I never said anything of the sort.
Stop making up random bullshit to fit your narrative.
I said there is no evidence that they had surveillance inside his house.
Because there isn't.
A beautiful teaching moment of grammar indeed.
If you say, well "you say" in the context I wrote it, it has a meaning of "you think?" not "literally/exactly/correctly/word for word/strictly/accurately" repeating what you said or putting words into your mouth.
No, but you stated that Wilfred "must" have detected Eiza.
I simply provided plausible reasons for why no-one, including Wilfred, detected her.
You're making him out to be some sort of super-human, when he's just a man, ergo "he doesn't have radar, or bat hearing.".
You really didn't give any plausible reasons for why no one detected her. You only said one reason and that is that she was an assassin form one of the best assassin houses. Is that really a good reason without saying anything extra?
My reasoning as I mentioned and you are simply ignoring it, was that Wilfred got to the room way too quickly, like way too quickly for him not to have noticed her. Unless he is a superhuman. Then again I am wrong.
You are blatantly trying to twist things to fit your narrative, yet you have not provided a single piece of evidence that supports your narrative, only speculative stretches of what "could", "maybe", or "might" have happened.
The actual, real, evidence does not support your narrative, currently.
I am not trying to insult you or anything, but are you blind? Your reason is "she is a really good assassin", that is it.
I did provide quite a lot of evidence actually and you avoid to mention it like it's plague which is that everything happened way too quickly for Wilfred not to be able to notice her already.
And I will write it again, their conversation was way too short for him to get there that quickly all dressed up and fancy. But let's give you even more evidence. Only during one point did MC raise his voice and that was somewhere in the middle of their conversation. If he in fact heart that, he still came way to quickly into the room.
Given all that I still think he in fact noticed her because he came to the room way too quickly. How is that not good evidence?