You must be registered to see the links
Whatever the creator offers is what a patron supports - these are advertised by the creator before you sign up, either for a tier-driven benefit or something more open-ended on your part. They could offer three tiers of membership benefits up to $20/month and you might decide to offer $50/month - there is no "implied contract" which says the creator must offer some sort of proportionally greater amount of benefits to such a patron.
It's very obvious that, despite my pointing out that I've already covered this earlier in the thread, you didn't bother to read my previous posts on this topic. If you had, you would know that you're just repeating what others have already said here.
Yes, there is an implied contract. Your linking to Patreon's legal page is not relevant to that point. The foundation of patronage is exactly that implied contract. If the implied contract is violated, then it will often (perhaps usually) result in the end of the patronage.
In short, it doesn't matter whether or not Patreon refers to an implied contact. It exists in the nature of patronage itself, as it always has throughout history.
If you don't understand what I'm talking about when I say "implied contract", then just say so, and I'll explain. But you only make yourself look ignorant when you link to Patreon's legal page to refute an implied contract.
This creator is asking for help to improve her game-making productivity, essentially. Her wording doesn't say she would drop the game without patrons, just that they would help enable her more fully.
The best you can argue is that she will attempt to produce releases more often with patron support than without, as I see it.
No, that's not the best that I can argue. We've already seen one occasion when Alishia admitted that she needed the Patreon donations to continue. Perhaps we'll see another instance.
However, my comment wasn't restricted to Alishia's development of this game. I said that, without people providing financial support for the development of these games, a majority of the games posted on this forum would never be made. I think that I have a pretty sound argument for that, whether I can show it definitively or not.
Don't act like you are signing a contract with the dev,because you are not.
I will spell it one more time for you
This is not a kickstarter and you don't pay for getting a game.
I'll spell it out one more time for
you
There is an implied contract. As I said to fried, if you don't know what "implied contract" means, then just ask. I never said anything about a legal document which anyone would have to sign. And yes, there absolutely is an implied contract between the developer and the patrons. For a more in depth explanation of what that contract is and what it entails, see my previous posts on this topic in this thread.
And I didn't say we're paying to get a game. I said we're paying for the
development of the game. If you don't understand the distinction, then you shouldn't be trying to argue the point.
That's the thing-you don't make an investment.
This is Patreon,not Kickstarter.If you want to make an investment use Kickstarter or Indiegogo.
Yes, I absolutely have made an investment in the development of this game. It doesn't matter a damn whether this took place through Patreon or Kickstarter or SubscribeStar or Indiegogo or what-have-you.
You seem to be stuck in pedantic definitions of the terms "contract" and "investment". No one here has suggested that we're purchasing equity shares in the game, or that Red Room is a debt instrument (at least not that I've seen). That doesn't mean that we haven't invested.