- Sep 11, 2016
- 594
- 1,033
I'll end whit the GDPR subject by quoteing just the beginning and leave the link here for you to read the rest if you wish:For someone so well versed in English you make an awful lot of mistakes in your grammar.
You somehow managed to fuck up every "your" with "you're" and where you were supposed to you, instead you wrote "you are". That's hilarious.
And this is my last reply to you on GDPR. Really. because you don't know shit.
First of all just because its in an SDK it doesn't mean it's utilized. Do you even know what an SDK is? Just because analytics is built in doesn't mean it's used. And when it comes to programs doing anything on your computer. The files never leave your system, so cut your crap with rights on data collection, because it's not data collection.
It's not leaving your system, or ever will, and to add to this. I just find it extremely funny that you are coming in here with your bullshit, when in fact there is a game out there that IS potentially under scrutiny for GDPR compliance, and yet you come here.
GDPR is exactly for protecting your PII data (Personal Identifiable Information) and to protect your identity, "you are unaware that non personal information can fall under GDPR protection too" No it doesn't. All information that is associated with a person falls under the portability or disclosure rights but by itself it's not PII data.
So cut your bullshit because you don't know left from right. This is the completely wrong forum for this anyway. How about you go read up on GDPR from the source instead or speak to some lawyers.
I don't know what shitty blog post you read about this, but you seem to know an awful lot of nothing about the subject.
Seriously, stop tainting this thread with your bullshit.
And the reason i did mention glamour is because that game is in fact online, and requires user accounts, and since they sit on the servers, they DO have a connection log of some sort, containing at least your IP, so yes they have your personal informaton.
Now please, go somewhere else and bug people. This is for Timestamps, and i already answered your question earlier.
/A
You must be registered to see the links
The reason I started it is because you are about to make available your first product and unlike Glamor it's something I'm interested in and it would be a problem for me if the engine had similar features + it would have meant my patronage of the timestamps project would have to stop - it's still pending the result of next release.In European and other data protection regimes, which center primarily around theYou must be registered to see the links, the term "personal data" is significantly broader than PII, and determines the scope of the regulatory regime.
You must be registered to see the linksSpecial Publication 800-122 defines PII as "any information about an individual maintained by an agency, including (1) any information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual's identity, such as name, social security number, date and place of birth, mother's maiden name, or biometric records; and (2) any other information that is linked or linkable to an individual, such as medical, educational, financial, and employment information." So, for example, a user's IP address is not classed as PII on its own, but is classified as linked PII.
The concept of PII has become prevalent as information technology and the Internet have made it easier to collect PII leading to a profitable market in collecting and reselling PII. PII can also be exploited by criminals to stalk or steal the identity of a person, or to aid in the planning of criminal acts. As a response to these threats, many website privacy policies specifically address the gathering of PII, and lawmakers have enacted a series of legislation to limit the distribution and accessibility of PII.
However, PII is a legal concept, not a technical concept, and as noted, it is not utilised in all jurisdictions. Because of the versatility and power of modern re-identification algorithms, the absence of PII data does not mean that the remaining data does not identify individuals. While some attributes may not be uniquely identifying on their own, any attribute can be potentially identifying in combination with others. These attributes have been referred to as quasi-identifiers or pseudo-identifiers. While such data may not constitute PII in the United States, it is highly likely to remain personal data under European data protection law.
English is my third+ language so I consider my grammar good but thanks for the lesson I'll try not to repeat the mistakes you pointed out.
"there is no SDK to worry about" vs "First of all just because its in an SDK it doesn't mean it's utilized." If data is collected in a DB file then it probably is utilized + there is no need for the whole file to be sent, usually only the latest batch of collected data is transmuted or in many cases only the result of it after using the user system to calculate it. Besides my problem is not with the data being sent but collected in the first place.
I'm still waiting to hear your answer to this:
The moment you mentioned "* Own asset container file for all our assets, to prevent Unity compiled game size to be too big." it started smelling of encryption and now you confirmed it "I can tell you right now that the game files will be encrypted because it compromises the integrity of the game if you do any modifications to it, and it mainly also serves to save on space. Without doing this the game would have been over 5 times larger.". But I'd like to hear how will the encryption make the game 5 times smaller?