- Apr 10, 2020
- 638
- 403
Oh, I must be new here!!!!Well - let's see if we can make it easy enough for you to understand shall we?
The "date" you allude to is the date that it came into existence.
The information it's giving is up-to-date.
It's like ... I don't know ... Something (let's call it Nelix171) coming into existence (let's say 12 years ago) and yet is still producing information (a.k.a comments / opionions / facts) that most people find interesting / accurate / relaible and yet there's a (very) small minority (of ONE) who thinks that because something is "old" it's "out of date".
Perhaps we should judge comments from Nelix171 by the same criteria?
If the source is a year old (or more) then they are not to be trusted and to be deemed out of date?
On that basis, I will not bother to respond to Nelix171.
(end of)