TigrisRex

Newbie
Sep 5, 2020
20
8
Can someone tell me if the save editor is up to date? I remember the new one was made a rather long time ago.

If not, can somebody update it? Or at least request it be updated?
They wont, the guy who made it doesn't like Electon if thats the program, so he left it where it is, but if you go to the menu while in game and click the top of the i in TiTs you unlock the cheat menu which is nice for the unlimited crew option, I personally kept the save editor and the last version of Tits on Flash so i can do saves where i can edit whatever i want.
 

Sscdrake

Active Member
Jun 24, 2018
536
1,034
It was there in the original game, too, but there were less characters overall so each one stood out a bit more. In playing both after letting them sit for years to build up new stuff, it gets fatiguing to run into a new character and see yet another "and as her G-cup tiddies slap her in the face with each step, a two foot dong swinging with menacing intent between her legs, you ask yourself: gun to your head, could you tell this character apart from the rest?" description.

also screwing over the tekkie class is a tradition that stretches back to the very beginning.
I'm aware hyper was IN the original game, but I have played the original game a TON, and love text-based games a lot so it especially stuck to me (my favorite genres are VNs, crpgs, read a lot of novels too). Trust me, most of it was optional from the start and most characters where it could be argued a case (i.e. goblins) was pretty tame or made sense (the sex-maddened and corrupted sex-body-horror super demons).

The game was and is about choice, though, and a lot of characters were pretty normal unless they were horribly corrupted. In TiTs and CoC2, the FOCUS is almost completely on hyper to the point where every other kink is used as a subset of hyper. Characters are normally presented and drawn that way from the start, as if it's just how everyone is.

If you've played CoC, the difference is so obvious that it's really hard to argue.
 

TerreCrimson

Newbie
Sep 4, 2021
64
86
Yeah it is.

Siegwulfe dom mode is different from Bimbo, first you need a normal Siegwulfe and show it to Badger who will give you a lil quest which transforms into a Bimbo Dommy.

She ass fucks you and keeps trying to make you her bitch, making you "pregnant" with ovilium eggs.

The normal bimbo siegwulfe you get from Badger however isn't a dommy and just a bimbo who wants to get fucked.
Slight note, you don't have to give her the ability to egg you with the dick. If you just want the domme without the eggnany you can do that.
 

balitz Method

Active Member
Jan 30, 2018
817
1,283
I'm aware hyper was IN the original game, but I have played the original game a TON, and love text-based games a lot so it especially stuck to me (my favorite genres are VNs, crpgs, read a lot of novels too). Trust me, most of it was optional from the start and most characters where it could be argued a case (i.e. goblins) was pretty tame or made sense (the sex-maddened and corrupted sex-body-horror super demons).

The game was and is about choice, though, and a lot of characters were pretty normal unless they were horribly corrupted. In TiTs and CoC2, the FOCUS is almost completely on hyper to the point where every other kink is used as a subset of hyper. Characters are normally presented and drawn that way from the start, as if it's just how everyone is.

If you've played CoC, the difference is so obvious that it's really hard to argue.
The difference is of intensity. While the majority of characters in CoC are hyper-focused, that was at least presented as a deviation from the norm. In CoCII that's just how everyone is to the point where even descriptions of smaller breasts or dicks sound like they were written by someone whose family was being held hostage to coerce them into coming up with something that could hypothetically be appealing about B-cups.
 

BackFlipz

Newbie
Aug 17, 2019
63
128
Can someone drop a save from this patch? I accidentally nuked mine trying to regain access to sad panda(still couldnt).
 
Apr 8, 2020
33
107
The difference is of intensity. While the majority of characters in CoC are hyper-focused, that was at least presented as a deviation from the norm. In CoCII that's just how everyone is to the point where even descriptions of smaller breasts or dicks sound like they were written by someone whose family was being held hostage to coerce them into coming up with something that could hypothetically be appealing about B-cups.
Personally not a big fan of the hyper stuff and I can still enjoy the game for what it is. Do I feel like less hyper content, or more tailored towards it by having only some characters be hyper proportioned? 100%. But it's also a core part of it's identity, and one of the only consistent things about the game (along with everyone being a massive slut/polyamorous).

Tbh the only good part of this game is the erotic writting, the proportions and characters in general are total boner killers unless you have very rare and specific tastes. It's also funny that the average dick size is bigger than the maximum you can pick at character creation for anything besides Leithan. Comedic but not erotic, that's how I feel about most of the game.
 

JOSHUAs9

Member
Aug 5, 2021
102
69
Personally not a big fan of the hyper stuff and I can still enjoy the game for what it is. Do I feel like less hyper content, or more tailored towards it by having only some characters be hyper proportioned? 100%. But it's also a core part of it's identity, and one of the only consistent things about the game (along with everyone being a massive slut/polyamorous).

Tbh the only good part of this game is the erotic writting, the proportions and characters in general are total boner killers unless you have very rare and specific tastes. It's also funny that the average dick size is bigger than the maximum you can pick at character creation for anything besides Leithan. Comedic but not erotic, that's how I feel about most of the game.
OR have them option to MAKE them Hyper like some of are companions would be a good comprise
 
4.00 star(s) 65 Votes