Krosos
Engaged Member
- Dec 1, 2018
- 2,169
- 2,089
Var is pretty much a kind of panic development it had to be finished fastWell I guess there's 100 other ways, all of them better than the way VAR "solve" it.
It's not exactly the way how you would develop a stable working standard with several steps of validation processes for the entire model function of it.
But being a "fast shoot" it's decently working for it's purpose though stability is a entire different measurement
But it is here now and it is implemented and it drives the complete distribution system and we have to see when it will be replaced by VAR 2.0
But it was also a lot the fault of the involved creators as well being not carefull enough detecting the entire problem scope in the hot testing and evaluation phase of it.
Im pretty confident VAR 2.0 will get much more stable inside VAM 2.x lessons have been learned and tighter integration is now possible with the refactoring ongoing
Last edited: