- Jul 29, 2017
- 539
- 1,140
Yes, MC can use magic to make any girl he meets be related to him.
/sarcasm
- Thread starter magicnuts
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dcg adventure anal sex animated big ass big tits cheating creampie exhibitionism fantasy groping group sex handjob harem humor male protagonist masturbation milf monster girl oral sex paranormal point & click romance sandbox sex toys spanking teasing titfuck transformation vaginal sex voyeurism
/sarcasm
- Nov 24, 2018
- 1,036
- 5,094
You know, one of the frustrating things about being a developer is that you kind of have to live by the mantra, "The customer's always right." It doesn't mean that you have to do everything that every player wants, but it does mean that when you write a scathing commentary about some requested feature, you really should take a deep breath, think twice, and then delete it.
<sigh>
The comment I just wrote and deleted was funny too...
Tlaero
<sigh>
The comment I just wrote and deleted was funny too...
Tlaero
- Aug 4, 2017
- 7
- 4
- Jul 2, 2020
- 1
- 0
- Jun 21, 2017
- 5,545
- 5,455
Well yes, two different people with different styles and the setting (mostly normal life and fantasy) is also different.
If you mean it's better in every way than SS...that's debatable and i'm sure the first thing that comes up will be the cash again. xD
- Jun 17, 2018
- 1,141
- 1,510
- Jun 4, 2019
- 3,408
- 13,771
My first job managing a place, my boss took me to one side and said "You know the idea that the "customer is always right"? Forget it. The customer is an idiot and doesn't know what they want." She then told me that my job isn't to put up with their shit, but to guide their stupid asses to what you know they want.
She was immediately proven right when an idiot came in, ranting and raving about the water being gone outside and we were trying to cheat them. (It was a store right on the water and it was low tide. I had to explain the concept of tides to a 60 year old man)
Point is, developers need to remember that people are idiots. As proven when forum members post stupid questions in a thread when it'd only take 30 seconds to search for the answer.
We don't plan to add incest because we don't want the hassle of dealing with Patreon restrictions. There will be motherly characters (e.g., Gretta) and adoptive mothers (seven of them), but no incest per se.
Thank you so much.
If you mean where's Pixie Path, then go to the forest, and there should be a sign that takes you there. If you're having trouble with the hidden photo, check the OP.
Thanks. And yes, What a Legend is the first and only game we've done.
A few days after all of the tasks shown in the OP are at 100%.
No, no scathing comments. My assumption is that if someone takes the trouble of requesting a feature, they must have liked the game enough to want to see it improved (according to their criteria). If these improvements match our vision of how the game should be and also are something that we might like making, then great. Otherwise, it's easy to say 'sorry, but no'.
Dealing with screaming customers must be really tough. I can't imagine what I would do.
Online though, I'm pretty patient when it comes to answering questions or responding to requests. It does get cumbersome after the tenth time the same topic has come up, but it's okay.
- Jun 4, 2019
- 3,408
- 13,771
The initial idea behind the 'think' mechanic was making it difficult for the MC to get to the final happy end, so that once it's reached as the result of his perseverance and hard work, regardless of failures along the way, they feel more earned. As we started working on it, though, it ended up being a useful tool in many other ways:
-To add humor (e.g., hiding in the bush)
-To add sexy scenes (e.g., the scene with Rose to get the glue)
-To cover the logical but boring solutions (there's one in the next release)
-To give structure to the gameplay. I tried removing the 'think' from 0.3, and it worked, but was definitely more confusing, and even I found myself wondering: 'so what do I have to do next?'
-To create a sense of expectation and familiarity in the player who knows that the first two options won't work but will (hopefully) be funny or sexy and that the third one will save the day.
-To allow the MC to bond with a character (e.g., going on a late-night adventure with Holly)
The first two options in the 'think' quest should:
-Be over quickly (e.g., climbing the wall and failing to get in)
or
- Be relevant for the third and final solution (e.g., the sheep costume)
Will this mechanic get boring and repetitious after a while? I guess so. Which is why we want to come up with other mechanics as well. But not for 0.4. In fact, there are two think quests in the next release.
We've had linear content (e.g., the dungeon events), and there will be more in the future (including in 0.4), but we want to make it more game-like (or at least try).
If you, or others, have any suggestions for mechanics that might make sense in the world we've created, then feel free to share it because that's something we mean to work on in the future.
- Jun 17, 2019
- 4,018
- 13,043
You can "think" at any time of the day, even just after finishing the previous 'think' quest. I'm guessing you're suggesting that, after failing the first attempt, the MC could inmediately think for himself at that very same location what to do next. Sure, now this thinking it's restricted to one specific place in the map but I don't think that couple of extra clicks are so much hassle. Also, this way gives the game some continuity, a common scenary for all the stories that I find quite cozy. There's a main location for each story, a central hub where your MC goes to try and solve that story. If you want to follow that story, you go there and think. If you're not interested in it, you just don't think. And you know it's the same for every story. Now it could feel a waste, but in the future, when you'll have like 12 available side quest and you could be jumping from one to another, doing them in parallel, this feature would be very convenient in order to know exactly where are you and what were you trying to do.
Also, people seem to be loving the game despite this lack of 'gaming' content (or maybe because of this), as you don't have to scratch your head to guess what to do and where to go next. If a walkthrough is needed, that would mean this game would be an actual challenge, and I think that's not what devs are trying to achieve here. They already had to disclose where the hidden art pieces are because people can't find on their own the only minor detail that's not explicitly contained in the hints system and keep asking for them (they still do and it's fairly annoying). Delete the think thing and people will start right away asking for a walkthrough because they just wouldn't know what to do next because maybe they clicked a bit too fast after their last 'fail'.