yossa999
Engaged Member
- Dec 5, 2020
- 3,640
- 24,314
- 669
You're both right in your own way, because holy hell - someone bought a ticket to a Linkin Park concert, but Justin Bieber came out with a guitar singing Linkin Park songs.
Half the crowd will say: 'Well, it's still music and Linkin Park songs,' while the other half will scream: 'This is bullshit, we've been scammed.
The only thing I can add to this. Don't know about you but I'm happy that I didn't go to the RNasc's favorite restaurant where they serve shit on the plates.Let's actually take the analog further:
There was a club, it was a dive bar called old WiaB, had a door fee no one paid but the regulars. Had comedy nights, country, blues and the odd hip hop act, maybe some punk. Got a make over as a bright shiny new venue, decided to call itself Wiab Ch1-3. Hadn't yet decided what music was playing, was keeping it all non-committal, but was going for highly polished professional vibe, no bands getting drunk and puking anywhere anytime like before. But it was bright and shiny, and highly anticipated. People kept wondering how it would be different from the old club - sure it was shiny, but the themes and genres weren't locked in. What kind of bands could they expect? Looked promising, from the few industry do's that the place actually put on.
Then the club couldn't pay rent and wasn't finished renovating.
You're the manager who has to solve this. What happens?
A: Club opens as as, but fails to meet the city planning regulations. Puts on music that goes against the policies of the current council's guidelines. Club closes permanently, undermining the owner's portfolio. Eyes are on compliance with twice as much scrutiny.
B: Club renovates and puts on drum and bass, dance, techno, whatever the crazy *paying* kids are into. Does the market research into what they think the majority of people with money for the entrance fee want to see. Old patrons come around and feel pissed off. Some are happy enough, because it's their 'hood, while others wonder why they're still standing in front of a club they no longer like, rather than finding a new dive bar for a drink.
C: Pretend the city is wrong and that somehow a single independant WiaB can take on the regulations and win, rsulting in A.
There's a couple of things this scenario says to me. A or C result in no WiaB open for business. You'll just look at the start of careers in black and white nostalgia. You'll never get to see the grand opening of this because it shut down. Or you go find a new bar that feels comfortable like home, even though the city is actively enforcing it's regulations, prohibition style. Eventually, you'll not find the kinds of clubs that were open back then, because the devs can't afford to run at a loss.
Lastly in B there's the quality of the renovations. They meet the city regulations, so it can open, and start paying rent without pulling money from the other club that's doing pop music for the college kids. Is the renovation good? Well, it's open and compliant, but they rushed to open, no matter how long it took. Can the club be renovated while open? Yes. Will it happen? Unknown.
Let's not confuse the renovation with the necessity of the change. The marketplace is changing and there will be a lot of devs who have to consider how they're also going to renovate. Old school patrons of all these underground clubs will feel abandoned, not just this thread. The industry's moving that way, and no complaint about free speech will change that.
Because, you know, of the mafia reasons.