- Mar 12, 2022
- 147
- 327
Assuming you were adding this comment to further the conversation I was having in the post right above yours...I think the only thing that adding harem to a game that wasnt originally harem does to the user is make them feel like the choices are not as important or doesnt make you think as hard.
when its not a harem game and you have the options to cheat or you're figuring out who you like the decisions feel a lot more real and important, you think a lot more about it, "if i do this will this person find out in a chapter or 2 or will that ruin this with her" those kind of things. this is one reason i like games that are not harems. others dont need to agree this is all personal opinion on what i can see affecting people who do like that.
i play harem games too and i dont mind them, some i prefer to be like that but for me it definitely feels like the decisions with the women are a lot less important which does take away a certain realistic feel and feeling.
This again assumes that everyone who has the choice to do a harem ending chooses that path. I don't think that is a valid conclusion given that many people don't like harems in games. Also it assumes that a harem ending must include all characters. It is possible to have a "limited" harem where some characters are willing and some are not.
I am in NO way advocating for or against any outcome/ending for this game. That wasn't the purpose for my comment. i was addressing the claim that harem is equal to eliminating all choice. You can still make bad choices in a harem game and not get an ending with all characters sharing your bed. You can still pick and choose whom you want to share your bed. There are no "hard choices" in a porn game as you just pick a different choice to see what happens. The idea of having more than one game running at the same time isn't novel, many people do it. Again I am not advocating what should or shouldn't be done here. I just challenge the position that harem = kinetic novel. It certainly wouldn't in this game where your choices decide the outcome of the will. Which means there are stakes greater than who you share your bed with.
The developer made a game and part of making subjective media is people are going to like, dislike, wishlist features or narrative paths until the end of time. None of it is right or wrong. If someone hates something you love, they aren't wrong. If someone loves what you hate they aren't wrong. Yet claiming adding a different set of choices to lead to a different path, in this case a harem path isn't by definition removing choice, you can not remove choice by giving people more choice. And an argument can be mad that if a set of choices is so greatly in demand that EVERYONE would take said path and thus create the illusion of no choice then that is on the developer for not making the other choices compelling enough to explore. Which is a problem of bad writing not a problem with adding the choice in the first place.
Anyway I've said my peace and I have no strong opinion of whether the developer should or shouldn't have added a harem choice at this point in time. I'm going to wait until the game is done to see if i enjoyed the game. If the developer sticks the landing so to speak for the ending I won't care but if the dev fumbles the ending I am likely going to be a harsher critic of what should or shouldn't have been done with the game.