- May 17, 2020
- 11,098
- 21,714
that would make senseYou are correct.
The game is a bit ambiguous, but the distinction seems to be that if a would-be heir fails to sign and agree to the conditions, their share is divided between the remaining heirs (or the animals, if all three refuse). If an heir accepts the terms but later defaults, their share then goes straight to the animals.
It's not clear what stops us from just signing and then instantly defaulting, however. My guess is that since the first installment of the inheritance is paid out after a year, that's when the animals come into play. Anyone who makes it a year gets 10% of their money, and then locks in the rest for either themselves or the animals. Anyone who defaults before then is treated as if they never signed the deal.
Hopefully it will be clarified some day, preferably before the final reading!
otherwise MC would have no reason not to sign and immediately make out with Katie on Greg's table. and even the theories about the third heir trying to put MC (and / or Elaine) out of the way wouldn't make much sense