- Aug 16, 2018
- 45
- 67
What did you read, by Jove?Wow. What the hell did I just read on page 7? Jesus.
Yeah, I've pretty much given up on this game to ever break out of the "THIS ISN'T LESBIAN" conversations forever.
That is the "benefit" of the creative process on any major sharing sites.Ps: JUST TO CLARIFY...
I will always be eternally grateful for anyone who defends, or appreciates, or understands, or even just tolerates the choices I made as the writer of Zia.
The whole "lesbian conversation" angle in the above comment was less about the people involved, (even those who don't like the hetero scene)...
And more about how a single "tag" (added purely based on the site's definition for it) ended up derailing this entire project's reception/focus into being mostly about that tag itself.
There's nothing to say about Zia/Nina in this update, but Zia's scene with "old lady" was nice. Hope there'll be options for Zia also be in charge in future.Yeah, I've pretty much given up on this game to ever break out of the "THIS ISN'T LESBIAN" conversations forever.
I'm not blaming anyone. It is what it is.
Still, I HUMBLY REQUEST anyone who is interested in the actually important aspects of the game (i.e. story and art) - to share with us your thoughts about the romance, the renders, the surprises, your favorite moments... and literally anything you can think of.
It doesn't even have to be positives. Even criticism are most welcome.
It will be a huge moral boost for us to hear opinions and feedback about our "actual work".
Be reassured, it didn't derail the reception of the game for everybody, only for a few picky players, probably Personally I'm quite interested in Zia. I love how she helped a poor lost soul, in a naughty but cute way.And more about how a single "tag" (added purely based on the site's definition for it) ended up derailing this entire project's reception/focus into being mostly about that tag itself.
I get that it's kinda rough to deal with a debate like this when it was never the intended angle of the game, but at the same time I struggle to take the statement about valuing feedback seriously when apparently keeping a fully superfluous and pretty unimaginative, as well as unfunny, "joke" around that severely hampers the ability of quite a lot of people to enjoy what the actual game is supposed to be is mandatory for the story, despite not adding anything of value to it. Edit: said story that only starts after the "joke" which is a full, dragged out and extremely uncomfortable scene at best (for anyone interested in lesbian romance)
Might I ask why and how "battle lesbians" were able to endure that torture in the first place?I get that it's kinda rough to deal with a debate like this when it was never the intended angle of the game, but at the same time I struggle to take the statement about valuing feedback seriously when apparently keeping a fully superfluous and pretty unimaginative, as well as unfunny, "joke" around that severely hampers the ability of quite a lot of people to enjoy what the actual game is supposed to be is mandatory for the story, despite not adding anything of value to it. Edit: said story that only starts after the "joke" which is a full, dragged out and extremely uncomfortable scene at best (for anyone interested in lesbian romance)
The searchable TAGS on top include "lesbian" as well, but remember that these TAGS are set by the moderators and not by the thread owner/developer.Genre:
3DCG, FEMALE PROTAGONIST, Romance, Fantasy
Might I ask why and how "battle lesbians" were able to endure that torture in the first place?
I mean in the total beginning of this game AFAIR there was no lesbian tag at all and there was no comment from the developer that Zia is bisexual and you can play her how you want i.e. fully lesbian or fully hetero.
To remind you:
The official tags are this
The searchable TAGS on top include "lesbian" as well, but remember that these TAGS are set by the moderators and not by the thread owner/developer.
There was no incentive for players to sit through this torture because at the time there was not the promise that it would be "better".
The scene was present right from the very first moment the game was available to download. And despite OR BECAUSE of this the game saw a 0.2, a 0.3 and now a 0.4.
"Completely full battle lesbians" might have been deterred at the first version, but now are vehemently and aggressively demanding that this part of the game that they and nobody else do not like MUST be changed.
If you don't like a part of the game you are free to make suggestions.
But you are NOT free to make demands.
Slightly off.View attachment 3263342
You are joking, right? Its on the front page, don't try to rewrite history, I get it the dev didn't know what 'only lesbian' entails for the players in the genre, but don't pretend that premise/confusion was not what brought a lot of people here, myself included. And people complained about it from the start and stuck around hoping it might get reworked. People didn't just woke up 3 versions later to complain about it like you imply.
--IMPORTANT NOTE--
ZIA IS BISEXUAL!!!
The lesbian tag on the thread is in accordance with the site's definition - "Sexual acts between two or more females"
If you want a game that treats its female characters with care, and crafts a sincere "female-female" romance route as much as the "male-female" one - then you may like this VN.
But if your top priority is that the protagonist shouldn't be interested in any men, even in the slightest - then this game is not for you.
I was in the thread the moment it was posted, 'only lesbian' was in the OG synopsis, it got changed to '(After the one, non-skippable hetero scene in 0.1) You will also have the flexibility to stick to "only male partners" or "only female partners" in all future updates.' after people complained thats not what lesbian only means, hell you can see the posts, most of them are still there.Slightly off.
It is not rewriting history when I repeatedly say that A HETERO SCENE BEFORE THE GAME TRULY STARTS DOES NOT MEAN THE GAME CAN NEVER BE LESBIAN as that is the main and recurring complaint.I was in the thread the moment it was posted, 'lesbian only' was in the OG synopsis, it got changed to '(After the one, non-skippable hetero scene in 0.1) You will also have the flexibility to stick to "only male partners" or "only female partners" in all future updates.' after people complained thats not what lesbian only means, hell you can see the posts, most of them are still there.
...and now edited again to what you just posted. Like I said, stop trying to rewrite history, you aren't doing the dev any favors.
Some people do not understand the fact that the TAGS mean that content with that TAG is PRESENT in the movie/game/whatever and not that it EXCLUSIVELY IS PRESENT AND PREVENTS CONFLICTING CONTENT FROM BEING THERE.But, as other pointed out, some* do really care about it and even about their interpretation of the tags and some do not (especially for harem tag or neotare tag).
*I do not mean any person in this thread, but generally.