A long time for you maybe. Check rendering times of famous benchmarks like blender classroom for the 1060 and you will get 7 minutes give or take for a render, while it is a lot more than a 3090 it also is a scene more taxing than most VN renders here. A scene from evermotion will be done in 3 or 4 minutes with a 1060.
Dear v1900 you think my buddy cigzag don't know anything about it that now you want to stop bugging him. I refuse to accept it.A long time for you maybe. Check rendering times of famous benchmarks like blender classroom for the 1060 and you will get 5 minutes give or take for a render, while it is a lot more than a 3090 it also is a scene more taxing than most VN renders here. A scene from evermotion will be done in 3 or 4 minutes with a 1060.If 4 minutes to render a scene like that at 1080p is too much for you I will accept your answer and stop bugging you.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
C'mon cigzag you think you have been using it since doesn't mean it's universal right, your accusation against my bro v1900 is preposterous. I think you guys should fight as long as there is conclusion,
Is this a scene rendered from Daz Studio? It honestly doesn't look that complex or demanding to me, the lighting is fairly simple, it's outdoors, there's no 3d models/characters with hair and clothes to render in the scene...try filling this scene with more complex lighting and a few models and then see if it still takes four minutes. Or better yet, try an indoor scene with characters in it. That scene looks straight up like an HDRI map almost which is why it would render so quick. An environment with not much going on in it like that is obviously going to be an easy and fast render...A long time for you maybe. Check rendering times of famous benchmarks like blender classroom for the 1060 and you will get 7 minutes give or take for a render, while it is a lot more than a 3090 it also is a scene more taxing than most VN renders here. A scene from evermotion will be done in 3 or 4 minutes with a 1060.If 4 minutes to render a scene like that at 1080p is too much for you I will accept your answer and stop bugging you.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
.
havent you read any of dozen or more latest weekly WIP reports
It's your choice really, want to start fresh then delete old ver. (with save files). Overwrite it, then again no problem (mostly), previous saves do work for this one though. At least for me.
havent you read any of dozen or more latest weekly WIP reports
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
ok thanks
Thank you 4 the share.You must be registered to see the links
Hey everybody! Here are two WIP/screenshot of the developments modding from Part 11.
There is no prediction yet of the release date, so do bare with me as I do my best to deliver the next update as soon as I have it done.
Thank you all for your patience and as usual, see you soon
Oh, man! I went on a fucking quest, Mario style. You know, the ones where you clear the castle and fucking Peach isn't there. My purpose is to know if rendering time is a mayor obstacle with middle of the road hardware. You might get a laugh at my bad luck.Is this a scene rendered from Daz Studio? It honestly doesn't look that complex or demanding to me, the lighting is fairly simple, it's outdoors, there's no 3d models/characters with hair and clothes to render in the scene...try filling this scene with more complex lighting and a few models and then see if it still takes four minutes. Or better yet, try an indoor scene with characters in it. That scene looks straight up like an HDRI map almost which is why it would render so quick. An environment with not much going on in it like that is obviously going to be an easy and fast render...
This argument is probably not going to go anywhere however, since we both have a difference of views/opinions/experiences and I respect yours, so to save us both the hassle I am just going to agree to disagree with you and wish you a nice day
. Thinking I burned the 480 I swapped for another 480 with no luck turning my PC on. Swapped in my RX 5700 and the same shit. Turns out I had been using my PC with a busted AIO pump . Drove into town again and turns out the malls have being closed again because the pandemic rebound so I had to return and order it from Amazon . Any way it arrived today and I have finished my testing.) you can indeed get those 3000 renders we talked about. There are other things that take a lot of time from the production of a VN but rendering is not one of them. I have a new appreciation for the work of this and other devs. I take my hat off to all the devs in this site.
Appreciate your sincere efforts and also provides a behind the scenes perspective to a scene. I'm sure OrbOrigin would appreciate this experiment as well.Oh, man! I went on a fucking quest, Mario style. You know, the ones where you clear the castle and fucking Peach isn't there. My purpose is to know if rendering time is a mayor obstacle with middle of the road hardware. You might get a laugh at my bad luck.
First I dusted up my office keys (haven't been there for 3 years) and drove into town. When I retired and sold my business, I kept some PCs and was sure I had a 1060 there. No luck, found some Radeon RX 480s though and an old Nvidia 970. Left the 970, I would have hanged myself rendering in that POS and you would have pissed on my grave. Took the 480s seeing as they are almost the same as a 1060 (well the 480 does have 8 GB VRAM vs the 1060's 6 GB) and I don't feel like paying 1800 US Dollars for the one 1060 I found for sale.
Returned to my home and swapped my GPU. Then I downloaded Daz 3D and got the surprise that you need an Nvidia GPU or you are fucked, I could export it to another program but fuck it, so Blender it is. Downloaded Blender and started learning to use it. Started rendering and my PC turned off
I tested the classroom benchmark for blender (it is a scene that is freely available). The only changes I made were to turn on GPU rendering and change the rendering tile size from 32 pixels to 512 pixels. The time for completion was 6:36 minutes. I forgot to put proof of the RX 480 in the first renders but it is there on the later ones and I covered over my name at the bottom. The times to finish the render and VRAM usage (it is accurate) are at the top left corner of the rendering window.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Next up I added background models (you know those crappy ones to fill a scene, still 3D but with bad hair) and deactivated the depth of field to make it easy to see the crappy models. The rendering time was 6:53 minutes (just 17 seconds more).
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Now we get to the meat of the test. I added a model with nice hair. Completion time 8:25 minutes WTF! It is the hair dude trust me. Also the second image has the first proof that I am indeed using an RX 480.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Lastly I tried to take the time down so I did what some devs do, I fucked up the hair. Took down the time to 7 minutes flat (I am a smug bastard like that). I included a second image with proof that I am still using the same GPU (changed from Radeon GUI to Task Manager because Radeon GUI is too big).
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
After my testing I will say with some certainty that what eats a lot of production time is posing and animating the models for a scene. I tried it (didn't include those renders) and the best I could manage was to make the the model look like a chicken with polio. On the other hand I think that 2.5 hours of rendering for 20 days a month for 7 months (fuck hope it was 7 months
