Ok, here we go:
lol I think having a good think is what you need to do because you're making less sense with each post you make. I laid out a perfect example of what I was trying to get across;
Perfect? Which part was perfect? This:
"So far all of the tasks Sophia had to do haven't really stimulated her in any physical sense, but rather more in an emotional sense. She has been exploring her feelings on how each situation of being more and more exposed has opened her up to new ideas. Now Aiden decides to take it up a notch by making Sophia feel more physical pleasure by introducing a small vibrator he has control over during class. This idea has merit in that it's the next level of escalation (within reason) Aiden can take it to in trying to get Sophia to open up more sexually. Each task in the list has to get more and more progressive in moving Sophia to a desired outcome and the vibrator idea is just one small step to achieve it."
???
You're overlooking the direct and well documented connection between a women's physiology and their emotional state. You say "Aiden decides to take it up a notch ..." in the present tense, as if you're narrating an event in real time. That's ... well... NM. You make a declarative statement that "
it's the next level of escalation (within reason) Aiden can take it to in trying to get Sophia to open up more sexually." There are many other things that could be the next level, because the next level hasn't been determined yet as L&P hasn't revealed to us what the next level actually is, so again, you are conflating assumption with fact, and I'd suggest that children extorting a woman to insert a foreign object into her vagina is not at all within reason. Now, the boundary between reasonable and not reasonable is debatable, whereas, for example, Sophia wanking off those children in side job two was definitely not within reason.
that escalation was needed in Aiden's tasks for Sophia to continue to get to the desired outcome Aiden was shooting for.
What is the desired outcome Aiden was shooting for? When has that been expressed - we can all make assumptions, of course, but when has Aiden laid out what he is after, specifically? So how do you even know? You don't. So this is just blather.
It's going to have to get beyond a point where Sophia just exposes herself.
I agree, it will eventually have to get beyond just exposing herself, but a bunch of kids forcing her to penetrate herself with a sex toy is still dumb.
It's already reached a point where Aiden introduces touching her body so the escalation has already begun.
I didn't suggest that escalation hasn't begun so this is more blather. I'm more simpatico with the idea that exposing herself doesn't have to be just visual and definitely doesn't have to be borderline psychopathic.
I see getting her to secretly orgasm in front of an audience as the final peak to reach with her tasks.
Yes, a final peak, not task #4.
If anything your reasoning was dumb as I also explained how flawed your thinking was on what merit meant. It's okay to be wrong once in a while, but not being able to admit when you're wrong...well that's just dumb.
No, you actually did something completely different from evaluating my thinking, you introduced a bunch of extraneous information and argued against that, not what I actually wrote. There is a huge difference and I hope you can see that.
Examples:
"It's just you projecting your feelings of dislike for it and claiming it's "reality" to see it as dumb, and anyone who disagrees with you must like dumb ideas."
I never mentioned my feelings with regards to children extorting a woman to penetrate herself with a foreign object. You said you liked the idea, I never said you liked the idea. You're both pretending I said something I didn't and attributing feelings to me that I never expressed.
"She was obviously not "dumb" if she could play the violin and piano with above average skills."
This is neither true nor obvious. You are making a statement based on an assumption about all musicians - but it isn't all musicians, is it - it's just that she played a "classical" instrument, right? - having never met her: She was fun and funny and pretty (meh, cute, not really pretty) and talented and a hard worker. She definitely wasn't too bright. You might assume a good musician is not dumb, but this is a textbook example of a preconceived notion - an opinion formed beforehand without adequate evidence.
"So she definitely has merit in continuing to practice and play those instruments as her talent would show."
This, ... this, wow... this is just complete gobbledygook. And I'm not talking about its imperfect English grammar, I'm talking about not it meaning anything.
Anyway, that's more time than this argument deserves. It lacks merit.
