- Feb 14, 2018
- 1,422
- 4,890
Not putting myself amongst the patreon bashers, but I think we can identify the thinking behind the complaint: if patreons would drop their support in protest of the preposterously long development cycles the theory is that the drop in support would speed up development in order to make the project more appealing, more "worthy" of financial support.In the situation with AWAM, L&P and its patrons, you see that L&P makes fools of people.
For those who like AWAM and who enjoy every new update, no matter how long you have to wait, although of course it would be great if the updates came out faster, your comment is filled with envy for L&P and anger towards the people who support it.
In my opinion, it would be right and logical, if you like AWAM, to express gratitude to those who support L& P, since thanks to these people you have the opportunity to receive the game for free.
If you don't like AWAM, then what the hell are you doing here?
In this case, your opinion is empty for us and a burning sting for you. I don't know how, but you'll have to live with it.
Be strong, you have many more such years ahead of you.
OK, fair enough everyone, but let's consider:
There's really no data suggesting that a drop in support would lead to faster development. (Wolfinger wasn't wrong, but he wasn't right, either)
Using an unprovable notion as a bat with which you beat unnamed patreons from all parts of the globe through a computer screen is weird, at best.