- Feb 17, 2018
- 3,581
- 10,118
Carpal tunnel?Well... if the MC sits at home jerking off... there will be consequences. That part will be fleshed in... later.
Carpal tunnel?Well... if the MC sits at home jerking off... there will be consequences. That part will be fleshed in... later.
In Mr. Silver's route, I make bad decisions to see what can happen.Well... if the MC sits at home jerking off... there will be consequences. That part will be fleshed in... later.
They work for me. If you are having to play the game from Start with every new update, it makes me wonder what the issue is.What im saying is old saves dont work, one have to start from scratch every new update...
Except that Christine gives feedback on everything you do. Rollback is your friend.It is a bit irritating we have another combination lock scene though. I mean there is no way to actually know which path works than try them all.
...and now it is your post which needs to be edited. PThanks for the spoils muckraker.
Nope, just making fun of him singing. He actually is that bad.Spoiler?
I found that Christine's feedback was quite sufficient. I suppose some people might not bother to read what she is saying and thinking in response to the MC's actions, but it is kind of appropriate that ignoring your lover results in a "less than satisfactory" conclusion.Could hints like "maybe there are some things I shouldn't do to her here...I need to approach this differently" be dropped when a fail state occurs?
I meant to call attention to the fact you seem to have given away plot points for those who may not have wanted them spoiled.Nope, just making fun of him singing. He actually is that bad.
That should only happen if you choose to "work" on the computer.Question (Doing another playthrough w/o walkthrough,Corporate Path):
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I found that Christine's feedback was quite sufficient. I suppose some people might not bother to read what she is saying and thinking in response to the MC's actions, but it is kind of appropriate that ignoring your lover results in a "less than satisfactory" conclusion.
I have been following the "relationship" route, and I tried switching it up using your choices. She turned. I think it may have something to do with her variables. When I tried, she was at 60F, 31L. What did you have?Fuf, got a good ending ChristineSex with Open relationship
So, how to do it (horny - harem route): ...
Getting warmer...I have been following the "relationship" route, and I tried switching it up using your choices. She turned. I think it may have something to do with her variables. When I tried, she was at 60F, 31L. What did you have?
While your overall point seems valid to me, only one of the choices is counter-productive. The rest have variable results. Moreover, the trial-and-error feeling of the mini-game is reminiscent of the situation found between "new lovers" where you are learning what your partner likes and doesn't like, and what to do when. I do think there is room for improvement in the "feedback" category, and the mini-game could be a bit more forgiving (or even contain a "second chance" after she turns), but it seems to me that the overall effect seems sufficiently "realistic" to continue suspension of disbelief.My point is that if you give players a series of options in this manner, they will usually try them all, but more importantly they will automatically assume that they all have a purpose within the current game framework. In this case, some of the choices are actually a red herring as far as the mini-game is concerned. Now that is a type of purpose, granted, but just not the one that people may imagine I suspect.