- Aug 4, 2019
- 6,094
- 22,978
Interesting take, but a bit unfair.not quite the same thing eh.
in the case of Tommy and Heather, rightly or wrongly, MC has to decide for himself, he can't question either of them (indirectly Heather anyway lets him know she wants to know the truth). his moral judgment, or his dick, tells him to act in a certain way
in Jill's case, she in order to defend MC's interests does what MC expressly asked her not to do, she voluntarily goes against the request of the one whose interests she theoretically would like to do. MC's objection, that bringing it all out, might make his situation worse is not so far-fetched, at the party from the HOTs if the Jocks beat him up for good it would be Jill's "fault." but never mind the consequences: Jill determines that what she thinks is better than what MC thinks
MC , is directly asked by Tommy to keep his mouth shut, just like the rest of the Dik. and yet as you said ,
his moral judgment, ( or his dick ) , tells him to act in a certain way.
You have to apply the same logic to Jill. You see her as third party , instead of the Main Character of her own Story.
You have to see Jill as the protagonist, and MC as the secondary character, and then you'll see, it's exactly the same, as MC and the Tommy case.