qwertyqwe23123
New Member
- Nov 22, 2025
- 11
- 14
- 3
The difference between MC and Derek being members of the DiKs and Caleb being a member of the Alphas is that the Alphas are under Administrative supervision, so any rule breaking might result in their frat being dissolved.The same could be said about the DIKs. Both Derek and MC are now members of this fraternity and any negative actions towards the Alphas would have negative consequences for the rest of their fraternity. During the Christmas Party, the DIKs found a loophole in their mutual agreement between the DIKs and the Alphas. This means that the Alphas now have the upper hand in this regard, given that the DIKs have violated their own agreement with the Alphas. Therefore, the DIKs cannot afford to have another problem with them and on top of that, they have another problem with the Alphas thanks to the letters that certain Betas are sending them.
The agreement was that the HoTs will plan parties with both fraternities.
The DiKs planned the xmas party by themselves, therefore they broke no rule. Just because half the HoTs decided to show up doesn't mean the DiKs broke the rules. Moreso, even if I'd agree that someone broke the rules, it would be the HoTs who showed up, since they agreed to attend the Alpha party. (To be clear I'm not saying that