- Dec 20, 2019
- 1,213
- 1,262
Sorry my memory was fudged, and I forgot that the side mission is from Victorian era.The Victorian look for Kara is within the side mission. The side missions offer a break from the main story and ship environment. They will continue to have significantly different outcomes based upon player decisions. As far as lewd content with the main characters within these side missions, that is not really planned. With the side missions initiated independently from the main story, it would be difficult to have consistency with the current status on the ship. This however does not exclude lewd content with various other characters within the side stories. Perhaps some of these interactions will be required to get the 'best' outcome.
The majority of lewd content with the main characters will be repeatable. This has been rather minimal to this point, however gets some overdue attention next version. Plan currently is to rework Lia's interactive lewd content. The interactive lewd content was an experiment that sort of worked, however requires too much work for mediocre results. I will replace this with fewer higher quality animations (some of the existing animations will be re-used). Lewd content will also be expanded for Julia, Tiffany, Tanya and Kara in the next version.
I don't like to disappoint, however unlikely to have her wear a human disguise again. It sort of looses it's impact when done again. If you can suggest another plot outline where the human disguise is appropriate, I may be swayed in this decision. She will however be placed in environments where she will portray different roles and also wear very different attire.
Speaking of Lia's interactive content, what does the "0" stands for? I fail to figure it out. It's weird to represent that as penetration, because it would mean that I penetrated her before then main story scene and she shouldn't be afraid of the MC's dick size anymore? But if it did not mean penetration, then are you telling me she's only grinding the MC even after the "wedding"?