Older version has more content for sure. But if you want something more than porn.. the UE5 version is amazing. I actually decided to buy it, because the implementation of better combat, story, etc, really make it fun to play and not just get off to. Something I definitely want to support. Same with Subverse.
I personally want to see more "Games with Porn" as compared to just "Porn with a shell wrapped around it to call it a game."
it´s about preferences. The UE4 build was more oldschool and different style, but I wouldn't say "it's just a porn."Most of the games are simply porn hunting/unlocking gallery or normal game/normal story + some porn (fuck your enemies instead of killing and thats all folks) that if you separate it, the game will work too.
If you cross that line and have too much game and not enough content, it's not good either for a adult game.You need some balance.
Aesthetically, the UE4 game was good, graphics, music,freedom in the game feels nice (sadly empty unfinished world) and lewd things are part of the story. So the motivation to really play it was there. There's probably no point in going into the details because a lot of things were unfinished or never implemented.
Also in the beginning CI was nicknamed "Assassin's Creed: Furry".
It's in the context of the sexual content tags, with "fantasy" being the operating word here. I just replayed the quest in question to verify since it had been literal years since the last time I did it. For one, I completely forgot about the dragon eating the anubite guard onscreen, complete with a nasty chomp midway. Did they live through the chomp? Heck if I know. For two, the instant death you get as a player is the dragon's head coming down and then a fadeout before anything happens. So the actual end result is merely implied, debatable by the dragon demonstrably biting pre-gulp, and directly contradicts the developers themselves.
And all that is on top of the fact that the whole thing is painted in a negative light and an instant gameover. It's clearly not intended to be vore content from the developers' standpoint. And if you're using that broad of a definition of the tag, than The Mummy (yes, that movie) has vore because of the scenes where scarabs eat people alive. Which is certainly not comparable to Men In Black II and Serlena or whatever her name was.
Anyway, overall I think you get my point. Tagging that "vore" is like claiming this game has foot fetish content because the characters are running around barefoot. Technically yes - it has feet visible. Would it be enough to get someone off? And is it enough to put off someone who is repulsed by the fetish? Generally no to both cases.
Nice deep analysis. And it makes sense..
Maybe the mods take it as being eaten by a sexy, intelligent, fuckable character is highly sexual, on the contrary being eaten by an ordinary monster/enemy not. (BTW,Do you think Voronica is hot? - Voronica Goes to Town game).
It is also possible that they are just trolling you. "Hey, its that guy from CI thread, denied."
Edit: Fun fact! Just like with the lamia death, the game fades back in, has you die on the ground in front of the dragon, and then has you respawn at the docks. So if we're going on technicalities (in this case the developers being terrible at their gameover+respawn implementation) then it seems you got crunched and then spat back out.
I remember that, at least it's funny.
