- Apr 22, 2018
- 7
- 0
Thanks for the link but I'm not a patreon so I can really get it until it's released to the publicYou must be registered to see the links
:HeyGuys:
Thanks for the link but I'm not a patreon so I can really get it until it's released to the publicYou must be registered to see the links
:HeyGuys:
Because it's useless, especially since for this game the most important bug happen at load time and, unless you manually verify the variables, you have absolutely no way to know if your play is now corrupted or not. At least until the moment you're rejected by the alternate ending of the update. And still you don't necessarily understand that you have been rejected, since you don't know what to expect from this said alternate ending.Why not just save at every question?
I didn't make the remake in renpy so i don't know what to tell you about the complexity of it but as far as the variables not saving, I actually fixed that within a few days but it never got upped to f95, that's why I left the "do not use old saves" text file in there in case f95 users try to use a corrupt save. So far as I know, the new saves work and will work so long as I don't change the fsm.So I'll never see it unless I, again, restart from scratch a game I already started one hour ago... greet !
Choosing to cut MC's dick end the game (which is logical) while hesitating led to a reset of everything. Obviously not for everyone, but if it happened to me, it happened to other players... The points lose can be corrected, but the fact that _actions is defined with the sole reset's trigger make the game completely unplayable.
Seriously, why using a so complex mechanism, which lead to bugs half of the time, when anyway 99,99% of the time (I let you the benefit of doubt) a direct manipulation (with the help of __setattr__ if you really want to keep your dynamical approach) would do exactly the same thing, but without the bugs ?
And why this useless after_load process since the Machine objects are saved ? You just create bugs by doing this. Depending of the place you save, you've a correct load or encounter a list index out of range because there's more Machine objects in temp_machines than returned by your get_instances, first boom. And like on top of this you assume that the order will be the same in temp_machine and in the generator returned by get_instances, second boom.
Cherry on the cake, you defined get_instances as class method while using it as a static method, and should have defined it as standalone function:
And why designing it as a generator when you only use it in loops which will create a list ? Directly create the list and return it. Or, better, create a dict (str as key, "reference" as value) which will let you ensure that you'll address the right object in your after_load process (if really you need it, which I still doubt about) and prevent the list index error :Code:def get_instance( cls ): for inst_ref in cls.__refs__[cls]: inst = inst_ref() if inst is not None: yield inst [...] python: for m in get_instances(M_mc.__class__): machines.append(m)
Code:for m in temp_machines: if not str(m) in machines.keys(): continue mach = machines[str(m)] for state in mach._states: [...]
What variables not saved ? I explicitly said that everything is saved and correctly saved. It's the useless process at load time which mess with the variables, nothing else.but as far as the variables not saving, I actually fixed that within a few days but it never got upped to f95,
Well, I'll see a last time with the next update, because, "restart from scratch a game I already started one hour ago...", mean that it happened with a save made less than one hour before. This said, I don't have high hope for the said next update.So far as I know, the new saves work and will work so long as I don't change the fsm.
kWhat variables not saved ? I explicitly said that everything is saved and correctly saved. It's the useless process at load time which mess with the variables, nothing else.
Well, I'll see a last time with the next update, because, "restart from scratch a game I already started one hour ago...", mean that it happened with a save made less than one hour before. This said, I don't have high hope for the said next update.
OK. I haven't taken the time to look at the code for this game closely TBH, and I usually play the updates in one sitting so I don't encounter some of the issues people seem to run into on the basis of leaving and coming back to the game. Plus I use rollback a lot too, so my experience doesn't match what most people seem to do.Because it's useless, especially since for this game the most important bug happen at load time and, unless you manually verify the variables, you have absolutely no way to know if your play is now corrupted or not. At least until the moment you're rejected by the alternate ending of the update. And still you don't necessarily understand that you have been rejected, since you don't know what to expect from this said alternate ending.
windows link has all the chapters 1 2 3.why is chapter 2 only downloadable on android ? any windows download link ?
When's the chapter 3 for Android??
The washing machine is the father? So he is half washing machine half human?That is actually the father.
Just so you know.
Also this need s a new tag imo, <houshold appliances fetish>Wait a minute. Now I'm totally confused. Is that a dryer or a washing machine. Is apocalyps suggesting there is a separate washing machine in the room that is not right next to the dryer? Who does that?
Personally, I now think we need an entire update simply on household appliances and whether they are gender specific.
Will give new meaning to "UL" on this forum.Also this need s a new tag imo, <houshold appliances fetish>