- Oct 14, 2018
- 94
- 119
I agreePlease leave the ntr and bestiality crap for other threads that include them, what part of NO do some people not understand?
I agreePlease leave the ntr and bestiality crap for other threads that include them, what part of NO do some people not understand?
I wasn't aware I bolded anything. Completely by accident.I can get behind this post, except for the bold part. It implies that it is "not viable" anymore, whatever that means.
How is any of that not viable, apart from "I don't wanna write an arc about it" *stomps foot on the ground*.
Given that the game will be continued, there's ample time to ease in such things and not suddenly jump from having cuddly anal sex to visiting gloryholes in her spare time, which arguably does feel rushed or immersion-breaking.
But arguing that e.g. BDSM (to move away from bestiality per se) is not something that can be done is sort of weird, to say the least.
There is absolutely no really valid reason for, say, D not to try some light spanking or whatever in the heat of the moment and find out she actually likes it or gets aroused by it and feel inclined to explore this side of hers more. It's a starting point for further escalation.
Frankly, I understand it may seem that I'm heavily invested into D getting intimate with dogs. It's not about that really, getting 3 or 4 scenes at best with it won't be life-altering in any way (although I admit I'd glee with joy).
It is more about the general hard corruption that was hinted/promised, and even more about the principle of sticking with it.
No, I bolded that part to emphasize that I mostly agree with what you said except that one. Miscommunication on my part. Nothing to be sorry about.I wasn't aware I bolded anything. Completely by accident.![]()
You aren't wrong and you literally have every right to be upset when you basically just said Mr. Dots pulled a Blizzard(Warcraft 3 Reforged). For me I saw this coming a mile away so I'm not really surprised this was a bait and switch tactic, like I said in my previous post the way the story was going it just didn't seem possible which you could attribute to the writers in some sense. If I seemed condescending in my previous post I apologize I didn't mean to come off as such. I'm just at the point now in videogame production where I no longer believe a damn thing a developer says whether major or minor past accolades and achievements mean little to me if they're just going to screw me over in the future. So once again I'll give you even better advice.Here's the thing with that, there are and have been back and forths for quite a while. And there are also things that I take issue with.
1. I take issue with the fact that it was planned from the start, and for a very long time.
You must be registered to see the links- You can clearly see it the Fetishes list
You must be registered to see the links- Bonus points for the doggy render to lure more suckers in, like me.
A keen eye will observe that there are entries mentioning it who are dated 2 years into developing the game.
2. I take issue with the fact that the "authorities" that adamantly said NO and the ones that propagate that information, are writers and moderators and members of the fan discord, none of which had anything to do with the game for a very long time.
3. I take issue with the fact that the excuse basically is "Awww, poor MrDots really wants to do it, but the meanie writers won't let him". Really?
And on top of that the reason for not allowing him (it really sounds silly as I type it) are:
-They don't like it.
-The usual way of having intercourse with animals is not sexy. As nothing else in the game is idealized.
Please, go to your employer and say "Boss, remember when we said we're gonna makes these boxes in red and blue? Well, make them blue only. I don't like red. I'm gonna hold my breath till it happens". See how it goes.
4. I take issue with the fact that this whole time it has been "yes-yes-yes-yes-NO", which frankly seems like a well-placed bait for extra support. At least he got a couple hundred bucks from me so I guess it worked.
5. I take issue with the fact that MrDots is widely kept on a pedestal and can do no wrong, and shame on you if you have a different opinion.
6. I take issue with many people who feel that anything being done with their digital crush that they do not like is despicable, even if they never have to experience it themselves. Withdraw your troops.
7. I take issue with the fact that whoever as so much suggests than plans should be adhered to, or hopes for a change of heart gets told to shut up because no-one else likes these things, and they are a leeching minority anyway so who cares.
So us being into different wavelengths might be because we've had different things suggested to anticipate.
It's not about anyone "getting a fix", as if this is something people requested out of the blue and not hinted upon, or something that people need to get out of their system.
I apologize for making this a bit long, and for side-tracking the thread. I will not disturb this matter further.
Everyone can go back into commenting how D's face is adorable for pages upon pages.
I think you miswrote that. The fact is bestiality was planned from the start, or very early on. It said it on his Patreon page before the great purge, and as you showed with the wayback machine, on the dmd website.1. I take issue with the fact that it was planned from the start, and for a very long time.
You must be registered to see the links- You can clearly see it the Fetishes list
You must be registered to see the links- Bonus points for the doggy render to lure more suckers in, like me.
A keen eye will observe that there are entries mentioning it who are dated 2 years into developing the game.
This, I take issue with. Jeff Steel said that neither he nor Hearsz want bestiality. Jeff is an idea guy for dmd (and a writer for Melody, and I assume a writer for SL). Hearsz is the main writer. They both have had "anything to do with the game for a very long time".2. I take issue with the fact that the "authorities" that adamantly said NO and the ones that propagate that information, are writers and moderators and members of the fan discord, none of which had anything to do with the game for a very long time.
now you're speaking my language!i think Martin should come and steal D away and leave F with a box full of gerbils - then we can have NTR and bestiality in one monthly release.
Are you implying that every single one of his subscribers hates bestiality and anything non-vanilla? Because that would be an incredibly silly and unfounded assumption.Oh the eternal battle for bestiality in DMD. Who would win, I wonder? 4.000+ paying subscribers or 2-3 freeloaders complaining on a pirate forum?
Who is paying the bills/calling the shots? MrDots or this Discord admin who thinks they are running the game?8. The main administrator over on Discord is very opposed to bestiality and I value his opinion
Its called dramatic tension, we all know it won't happen even though the temptation for D may be there (especially when she finds out what daddy dearest has been up to with her best friend)To what end do you feel compelled to cajole others to necessitate such a hurtful scenario into such a game, actively working to supplant the MC for another just for the FAP of it.
I understand the need for dramatic tension hence, Rachel In this case. NTR as a general rule is not a problem per se. I can see a NTR lite where the MC and D are confronted by a third party but there needs to be a path to reconciliation or whats the point to this story? It's just another FAP-O-RAMA.Its called dramatic tension, we all know it won't happen even though the temptation for D may be there (especially when she finds out what daddy dearest has been up to with her best friend)
I am the dark one on the MDots team. From “hey, let’s show what happened when F loses the billiards game” to “hey, let’s script a Melody scene where she attempts but fails at suicide” ... my darker ideas are usually scrapped.Well if Collie cotius, Pony pounding, or Goat groping is your bag, Bon Appetit.
As for the NTR crowd you actively seek to disrupt the relationship, albeit a fictional story one that in my opinion has been a very carefully woven story of self discovery, and sexual coming of age. To what end do you feel compelled to cajole others to necessitate such a hurtful scenario into such a game, actively working to supplant the MC for another just for the FAP of it.
I can see the desire for this in some story genre's, but this story is not a dark one. Some still attempt to pressure the Dev to acquiesce to throw the story into a dark morass of self absorbed hedonism. If this is the sole desire of some I say... There are other VN's to chose from.
Remember sharing is caring lol.
Yup your right I must be a low self esteem bastard.
It is because they are low self esteem cucks. they likely had a successful Eric (Big Brother ref) in their real life who came along, fucked their girl or guy and got them kicked to the curb. so they try in any way possible to force that into everything people like or enjoy to turn it all shitty, so people can feel even a smidgen as miserable or pissed off as them. that is literally how they usually act and what the fetish is, and given how Jeff is trying to defend it and try putting it in i am guessing his significant other is cheating on him so he wants to make everyone else feel as shitty as him.To what end do you feel compelled to cajole others to necessitate such a hurtful scenario into such a game, actively working to supplant the MC for another just for the FAP of it.