So, I see little to quibble about, then
Honestly, it's definitely a quibble. It was intended to be a minor correction of an erroneous point to benefit someone who asked a fair question, but people keep thinking I'm saying something other than what I actually wrote, and it's getting weird. Ironically enough given the ensuing discussion, I thought my intent was blatantly obvious, but here we are...
Context in this game shows us that Martin has been one of the historically close friends of the MC
Indeed it has, which is why I don't think "your daughter is beautiful", coming from a close friend, is obviously step one on a path leading to a MMF route. I'm sure everyone here has at some point complimented a friend's girlfriend/spouse/sibling /whatever, but it doesn't therefore obviously follow that we're going to end up all sweaty and naked together.
I'd argue that complimenting someones appearance, especially a close friends daughter, isn't synonymous with being attracted to them, nor is it indicative of a desire for a sexual encounter.
I mean, what else could that indicate?
It could have easily indicated, using a close friend so as to present the idea in a non-threatening manner, that you were going to have to be aware of how other male characters will respond to D around F, not specifically Martin; or it could have just been an obvious observation from a close friend, in much the same way Georgina's compliment towards D wasn't the beginning of a potential MFF route (that's come simply by keeping both relationships running). Koko also complimented her; it doesn't logically follow that you're making a decision whether to begin on a F/D/Koko path, does it?
MrDots often provides some sort of escape route before taking an undesirable action, so it didn't seem to be a choice which would lead to a narrow, limited path.
True on both counts, but again, I've never said otherwise. All I've ever said is that the choices weren't necessarily obvious, and I only said that in direct response to someone who claimed they were; someone said they were new to the game and asked if they could avoid fetishes they didn't want to see, and were told "yes, all the choices are obvious, even without a walkthrough". I thought that was bad advice to give to someone (because of the last few pages worth of argument over the topic, and the fact that some people have even found "this will open a MMF route" to be too subtle a warning) and so I pointed out that the choices haven't all been obvious. My intent was to prevent them feeling misled, by being more precise.
You yourself have said that some of the choices are less clear in terms of consequence, so let me ask you; do you think telling that person (Trickstar, I think) that all the choices were obvious was an accurate thing to say?
Now, it's certainly fair to critique the style of this "sleeper" choice
Again, I'm not critiquing it; I was just saying that not all the choices that have thus far led to particular routes were as obvious as someone seemed to think they were, and that they may well remain subtle in future. That was literally all; I truly don't know why people keep interpreting that as a complaint on my part. I was just trying to give the guy better advice.