eddie987

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2018
1,527
6,966
i will choose no ,, thank you eddie
There will be sharing/swinging paths with at least 2 or 3 dudes, but don't worry, everything is optional so far. Even if you make a "wrong" choice at any point, you can click on the upper right corner (on the love points) and change the paths from there. So far there isn't any MMF content, but in the next update there will be. There is a scene with Olivia and Graham but he's just watching and you can completely avoid it if that bothers you. Just don't go to their place when she asks you.
There's a scene in a photoshoot where Ryan (the photographer) asks for a topless photo. Don't let her do it and you'll be ok with him too. There isn't any content with him yet, but if you let him take the pic, D will tell you that she likes him, if you don't she'll tell you she doesn't see him that way.
 

Monetauro

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2019
1,073
8,165
This is the only game that every time a guy shows up, I wish there was no man in this game besides father.
I mean, we usually already have that kind of feeling when you think of your own daughter, but she's still much more than that lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: LittleIr

thewhatever

Member
Aug 5, 2017
119
72
Deceiving episode
back to pure DD sex scene and her ass is still awkward , I think it's time for a new game from Mr Dot like dating my cousin or niece
 
Dec 2, 2019
53
48
Day 1207834945, Earth Cycle

Still no sharing with Martin
There really shouldn't be tbqh. His inclusion as a sexual fantasy or actual sex option is purely token and definitely continues the problematic over-sexualization of black males in erotica but lets go past that part. Martin has absolutely no value to be considered as a fantasy object for the D or a sharing option for the F. They didn't build the character that way, his contributions don't warrant that status. If they wanted to follow the story then Martins obvious inclusion should be as a tool for Rachel to use to pursue D and F. His relationship with Maria going on while she was obstructing the MC proves that he was never that good of a friend to the MC when his sexual interests are included. My opinion is that they should have introduced him as a sexual interest to Rachael and then have him plot to use the situation to promote his fantasies of D which he alluded to with his comments, and could have ultimately concluded with him in a Lucas type situation where he is forceful and rejected and eliminated or him choosing his friendship with the MC over his own desires for D and sexual relationship with Rachael which would then validate his inclusion as a a fantasy figure or sex option. Final note, if they were going to add situations just to be inclusive then the obvious choice probably should have been a female and/or trans char of color potentially in a dominant sex scene with a strap on/penis. Just saying...
 

leyre

Active Member
Jun 29, 2017
574
1,009
There really shouldn't be tbqh. His inclusion as a sexual fantasy or actual sex option is purely token and definitely continues the problematic over-sexualization of black males in erotica but lets go past that part. Martin has absolutely no value to be considered as a fantasy object for the D or a sharing option for the F. They didn't build the character that way, his contributions don't warrant that status. If they wanted to follow the story then Martins obvious inclusion should be as a tool for Rachel to use to pursue D and F. His relationship with Maria going on while she was obstructing the MC proves that he was never that good of a friend to the MC when his sexual interests are included. My opinion is that they should have introduced him as a sexual interest to Rachael and then have him plot to use the situation to promote his fantasies of D which he alluded to with his comments, and could have ultimately concluded with him in a Lucas type situation where he is forceful and rejected and eliminated or him choosing his friendship with the MC over his own desires for D and sexual relationship with Rachael which would then validate his inclusion as a a fantasy figure or sex option. Final note, if they were going to add situations just to be inclusive then the obvious choice probably should have been a female and/or trans char of color potentially in a dominant sex scene with a strap on/penis. Just saying...
stfu
 

eddie987

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2018
1,527
6,966
There really shouldn't be tbqh. His inclusion as a sexual fantasy or actual sex option is purely token and definitely continues the problematic over-sexualization of black males in erotica but lets go past that part. Martin has absolutely no value to be considered as a fantasy object for the D or a sharing option for the F. They didn't build the character that way, his contributions don't warrant that status. If they wanted to follow the story then Martins obvious inclusion should be as a tool for Rachel to use to pursue D and F. His relationship with Maria going on while she was obstructing the MC proves that he was never that good of a friend to the MC when his sexual interests are included. My opinion is that they should have introduced him as a sexual interest to Rachael and then have him plot to use the situation to promote his fantasies of D which he alluded to with his comments, and could have ultimately concluded with him in a Lucas type situation where he is forceful and rejected and eliminated or him choosing his friendship with the MC over his own desires for D and sexual relationship with Rachael which would then validate his inclusion as a a fantasy figure or sex option. Final note, if they were going to add situations just to be inclusive then the obvious choice probably should have been a female and/or trans char of color potentially in a dominant sex scene with a strap on/penis. Just saying...
You are absolutely right but it's quite obvious that they just wanted to include some BBC because there are people who get off with that or for "diversity"... I'm not a fan of it because and it doesn't fit with D's character, (The innocent girl who had sex with only one guy in her life, will fuck a random dude she only met a couple of times, just because he complimented her once and she watched interracial porn... And it'll probably be a one night stand thing, since the dude's living almost a day away... Right... That seems plausible) but since it's optional who gives a fuck?
 
Last edited:

Slimeee

Member
Oct 8, 2018
162
356
There really shouldn't be tbqh. His inclusion as a sexual fantasy or actual sex option is purely token and definitely continues the problematic over-sexualization of black males
"Problematic"
hahahahahahahahaha oh man
Just no, fiction is not reality, fiction does not nay should not answer to reality, be accountable to reality or be restricted by whatever political climate you have been lead to believe exists because it would somehow change how people think to read a fictional story, that is not how the human brain works, youve been lied to.
In fact the more "problematic" content there is the better, its always the most interesting, the ones that dont give a shit about the moralism of the day.
Absolute Freedom for art. Always.
 
Dec 2, 2019
53
48
You are absolutely right but it's quite obvious that they just wanted to include some BBC because there are people who get off with that or for "diversity"... I'm not a fan of it because and it doesn't fit with D's character, (The innocent girl who had sex with only one guy in her life, will fuck a random dude she only met a couple of times, just because he complimented her once and she watched interracial porn... And it'll probably be a one night stand thing, since the dude's living almost a day away... Right... That seems plausible) but since it's optional who gives a fuck?
True, but I think it could have been done better. Honestly, there are a lot of sexual situations in DMD that are barely held together for the sake of options and I think if they are going to go that route then they might as well just wrap the whole plot and publish a catalog of multiple choice scene options. It wouldn't be too hard to make things a bit more plausible and further the story experience. But who am I right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Monetauro
Dec 2, 2019
53
48
"Problematic"
hahahahahahahahaha oh man
Just no, fiction is not reality, fiction does not nay should not answer to reality, be accountable to reality or be restricted by whatever political climate you have been lead to believe exists because it would somehow change how people think to read a fictional story, that is not how the human brain works, youve been lied to.
In fact the more "problematic" content there is the better, its always the most interesting, the ones that dont give a shit about the moralism of the day.
Absolute Freedom for art. Always.
Except, your living in a reality where the industry is defined by that political climate and the realities of why those things are problematic are also well defined. My post wasn't meant to restrict artistic freedom but to point out that Martins inclusion seemed based on those same political factors rather than developed rationally within the plot. But seriously, it's plot left the rails for fetishism already so what's one more, right?
 

eddie987

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2018
1,527
6,966
True, but I think it could have been done better. Honestly, there are a lot of sexual situations in DMD that are barely held together for the sake of options and I think if they are going to go that route then they might as well just wrap the whole plot and publish a catalog of multiple choice scene options. It wouldn't be too hard to make things a bit more plausible and further the story experience. But who am I right?
I know what you mean. I honestly think that all these different sharing routes are just to please as many people as they can, and to drag the game out for as long as possible, so it's not a "passion project" for the people developing it anymore, but more of a job. MrDots didn't want to do NTR so he compromised with swinging. I totally get it, since more people mean more money, but I believe that's the reason behind the situations that barely hold together, that you mentioned. It supposed to be "Dating my Daughter", not "Sharing my Daughter with everyone we meet" after all... I might be totally wrong of course. It's just how I see it.
 
Dec 2, 2019
53
48
I know what you mean. I honestly think that all these different sharing routes are just to please as many people as they can, and to drag the game out for as long as possible, so it's not a "passion project" for the people developing it anymore, but more of a job. MrDots didn't want to do NTR so he compromised with swinging. I totally get it, since more people mean more money, but I believe that's the reason behind the situations that barely hold together, that you mentioned. It supposed to be "Dating my Daughter", not "Sharing my Daughter with everyone we meet" after all... I might be totally wrong of course. It's just how I see it.
I get that they realize that it's a fetish crowd that this game would appeal to and that they feel that people open to that fetish would probably like to see others but I think it falls short on delivery of the main story line and makes an ultimately satisfying love relationship between the main characters virtually impossible to rationalize.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddie987

cxx

Message Maestro
Nov 14, 2017
59,982
30,027
played d path jennifer/swing/etc path thru and it was very nice as usual tomorrow d path w/o jennifer/etc to see non-sharing scenes.
 

eddie987

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2018
1,527
6,966
I get that they realize that it's a fetish crowd that this game would appeal to and that they feel that people open to that fetish would probably like to see others but I think it falls short on delivery of the main story line and makes an ultimately satisfying love relationship between the main characters virtually impossible to rationalize.
The only sharing path that makes sense for me, (the way the story has evolved so far) is with Elena. Everything else seems forced. I personally like all the girls in the game, and I have different saves for each one of them, (not for the dudes thought. I don't want any other "D"s near D...) but that's the only path that makes sense storywise. But that's probably because I play these games to take my mind off things, and not to jerk off, so I prefere games with a decent storyline. People who just want fap material will probably go for quantity over quality which seems to be the "theme" of the recent updates. The game is still good if you play it a certain way. Not as good as it was before they moved, but good enough to keep playing it.
 
Dec 2, 2019
53
48
The only sharing path that makes sense for me, (the way the story has evolved so far) is with Elena. Everything else seems forced. I personally like all the girls in the game, and I have different saves for each one of them, (not for the dudes thought. I don't want any other "D"s near D...) but that's the only path that makes sense storywise. But that's probably because I play these games to take my mind off things, and not to jerk off, so I prefere games with a decent storyline. People who just want fap material will probably go for quantity over quality which seems to be the "theme" of the recent updates. The game is still good if you play it a certain way. Not as good as it was before they moved, but good enough to keep playing it.
It's not that I can't be ok with a sharing path, it's that it doesn't make sense with the fanatical devotion the daughter has with the father or the jealous nature of the father. If the arc leads to it in a rational manner then i get that it's included but you have to rationalize it with the story or you lose the main objective of the game and tbqh, you're right that only Elena seems to add up and that's still flimsy. If the MC was so free and easy with guys on his daughter and turned on by it then we wouldn't have had a few of the crucial story elements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddie987

eddie987

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2018
1,527
6,966
It's not that I can't be ok with a sharing path, it's that it doesn't make sense with the fanatical devotion the daughter has with the father or the jealous nature of the father. If the arc leads to it in a rational manner then i get that it's included but you have to rationalize it with the story or you lose the main objective of the game and tbqh, you're right that only Elena seems to add up and that's still flimsy. If the MC was so free and easy with guys on his daughter and turned on by it then we wouldn't have had a few of the crucial story elements.
Unfortunately it's very common to see people acting out of character just for the sake of a sex scene. Most of the times it's a woman turning dumb for no reason and gets "tricked" into sex or she becomes a cock hungry slut who'll fuck anyone, from one day to another... Another cliche you'll see here is the "since I fucked someone else, she can fuck whoever she wants". But yeah. The MC is definitely the jealous type, or he was in the first two chapters and now he does a 180 if you go for the sharing routes. The same goes for D. She keeps saying how much he loves him and wants to be with him and only him and blah blah blah and if you let Ryan take a topless photo of her, she suddenly likes him, and she's gonna fuck a dude she barely knows, because she watched interracial porn... At least if you avoid those paths the only weird behavior is that D becomes an exhibitionist way too fast, but you still get the jealousy and the devotion you mentioned from the characters. The Olivia/Graham thing also seems weird to me. It's going to a "They are also a father-daughter couple, we have something in common, so let's fuck each other's daugher. Oh! And we also owe them..." relationship? It's actually interesting how much less sense the game makes, just because you are on a different path.
 

jamdan

Forum Fanatic
Sep 28, 2018
4,290
22,950
I think the sharing path with Olivia/Graham makes sense, they are basically the older version of D/MC. They've helped MC/D more than the other characters in the game. MC has also had sex with Olivia and Olivia and D are starting to do what D/Elena did earlier in the game. (touching, kissing etc.). If you remember, Graham already gave Olivia permission to have sex with MC in chapter 2 and he "shared" her with MC when they went to their apartment after the club.
 

eddie987

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2018
1,527
6,966
I think the sharing path with Olivia/Graham makes sense, they are basically the older version of D/MC. They've helped MC/D more than the other characters in the game. MC has also had sex with Olivia and Olivia and D are starting to do what D/Elena did earlier in the game. (touching, kissing etc.). If you remember, Graham already gave Olivia permission to have sex with MC in chapter 2 and he "shared" her with MC when they went to their apartment after the club.
It makes sense to be friends, not to fuck each other. The Olivia thing was optional, you didn't have to fuck her if you didn't want to, but even if you did, it seems more like Graham let you fuck his daughter because he wanted to fuck yours, than a natural thing. And the touching-kissing you mentioned isn't something mutual, but Olivia trying to fuck D in every chance she has. Every single action was initiated by her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Casual Observer
3.80 star(s) 325 Votes