thanatos69
Member
- Oct 28, 2016
- 290
- 581
Oh the eternal battle for bestiality in DMD. Who would win, I wonder? 4.000+ paying subscribers or 2-3 freeloaders complaining on a pirate forum?
Mr.Dots...unless his writers revolt and refuse to do the scenes.Oh the eternal battle for bestiality in DMD. Who would win, I wonder? 4.000+ paying subscribers or 2-3 freeloaders complaining on a pirate forum?
i'm as excited to find out as you are!Oh the eternal battle for bestiality in DMD. Who would win, I wonder? 4.000+ paying subscribers or 2-3 freeloaders complaining on a pirate forum?
So many assumptions in so few words. Congratulations.Oh the eternal battle for bestiality in DMD. Who would win, I wonder? 4.000+ paying subscribers or 2-3 freeloaders complaining on a pirate forum?
Light spanking does not equal BDSM. While the former MAY be the first step towards the latter for some, it does not mean it must happen.Given that the game will be continued, there's ample time to ease in such things and not suddenly jump from having cuddly anal sex to visiting gloryholes in her spare time, which arguably does feel rushed or immersion-breaking.
But arguing that e.g. BDSM (to move away from bestiality per se) is not something that can be done is sort of weird, to say the least.
There is absolutely no really valid reason for, say, D not to try some light spanking or whatever in the heat of the moment and find out she actually likes it or gets aroused by it and feel inclined to explore this side of hers more. It's a starting point for further escalation.
Of course it doesn't, that's why I mentioned it only as a platform to start exploring that avenue. A form of either of the participants starting to think about it if you will.Light spanking does not equal BDSM. While the former MAY be the first step towards the latter for some, it does not mean it must happen.
From my own experience most women enjoy a little light spanking as part of a sexual relationship, but so far only one has wanted more than that.
I backed Dots financially on Patreon way back and then Subscribe Star more recently. I stopped when it was being flatly stated there would be no bestiality by his writers here and in discord.Oh the eternal battle for bestiality in DMD. Who would win, I wonder? 4.000+ paying subscribers or 2-3 freeloaders complaining on a pirate forum?
Good for you. Now go find a game that has bestiality in it and problem solvedI backed Dots financially on Patreon way back and then Subscribe Star more recently. I stopped when it was being flatly stated there would be no bestiality by his writers here and in discord.
Here's the thing with that, there are and have been back and forths for quite a while. And there are also things that I take issue with....Obviously we've been on different wavelengths with this whole corrupting thing if this is getting to people this much. My advice go play a game that involves that and get your fix there then come back here because the most taboo this game is gonna get is incest.
I agreePlease leave the ntr and bestiality crap for other threads that include them, what part of NO do some people not understand?
I wasn't aware I bolded anything. Completely by accident.I can get behind this post, except for the bold part. It implies that it is "not viable" anymore, whatever that means.
How is any of that not viable, apart from "I don't wanna write an arc about it" *stomps foot on the ground*.
Given that the game will be continued, there's ample time to ease in such things and not suddenly jump from having cuddly anal sex to visiting gloryholes in her spare time, which arguably does feel rushed or immersion-breaking.
But arguing that e.g. BDSM (to move away from bestiality per se) is not something that can be done is sort of weird, to say the least.
There is absolutely no really valid reason for, say, D not to try some light spanking or whatever in the heat of the moment and find out she actually likes it or gets aroused by it and feel inclined to explore this side of hers more. It's a starting point for further escalation.
Frankly, I understand it may seem that I'm heavily invested into D getting intimate with dogs. It's not about that really, getting 3 or 4 scenes at best with it won't be life-altering in any way (although I admit I'd glee with joy).
It is more about the general hard corruption that was hinted/promised, and even more about the principle of sticking with it.
No, I bolded that part to emphasize that I mostly agree with what you said except that one. Miscommunication on my part. Nothing to be sorry about.I wasn't aware I bolded anything. Completely by accident.![]()
You aren't wrong and you literally have every right to be upset when you basically just said Mr. Dots pulled a Blizzard(Warcraft 3 Reforged). For me I saw this coming a mile away so I'm not really surprised this was a bait and switch tactic, like I said in my previous post the way the story was going it just didn't seem possible which you could attribute to the writers in some sense. If I seemed condescending in my previous post I apologize I didn't mean to come off as such. I'm just at the point now in videogame production where I no longer believe a damn thing a developer says whether major or minor past accolades and achievements mean little to me if they're just going to screw me over in the future. So once again I'll give you even better advice.Here's the thing with that, there are and have been back and forths for quite a while. And there are also things that I take issue with.
1. I take issue with the fact that it was planned from the start, and for a very long time.
You must be registered to see the links- You can clearly see it the Fetishes list
You must be registered to see the links- Bonus points for the doggy render to lure more suckers in, like me.
A keen eye will observe that there are entries mentioning it who are dated 2 years into developing the game.
2. I take issue with the fact that the "authorities" that adamantly said NO and the ones that propagate that information, are writers and moderators and members of the fan discord, none of which had anything to do with the game for a very long time.
3. I take issue with the fact that the excuse basically is "Awww, poor MrDots really wants to do it, but the meanie writers won't let him". Really?
And on top of that the reason for not allowing him (it really sounds silly as I type it) are:
-They don't like it.
-The usual way of having intercourse with animals is not sexy. As nothing else in the game is idealized.
Please, go to your employer and say "Boss, remember when we said we're gonna makes these boxes in red and blue? Well, make them blue only. I don't like red. I'm gonna hold my breath till it happens". See how it goes.
4. I take issue with the fact that this whole time it has been "yes-yes-yes-yes-NO", which frankly seems like a well-placed bait for extra support. At least he got a couple hundred bucks from me so I guess it worked.
5. I take issue with the fact that MrDots is widely kept on a pedestal and can do no wrong, and shame on you if you have a different opinion.
6. I take issue with many people who feel that anything being done with their digital crush that they do not like is despicable, even if they never have to experience it themselves. Withdraw your troops.
7. I take issue with the fact that whoever as so much suggests than plans should be adhered to, or hopes for a change of heart gets told to shut up because no-one else likes these things, and they are a leeching minority anyway so who cares.
So us being into different wavelengths might be because we've had different things suggested to anticipate.
It's not about anyone "getting a fix", as if this is something people requested out of the blue and not hinted upon, or something that people need to get out of their system.
I apologize for making this a bit long, and for side-tracking the thread. I will not disturb this matter further.
Everyone can go back into commenting how D's face is adorable for pages upon pages.