Create and Fuck your AI Cum Slut -70% Summer Sale
x

fried

Almost
Donor
Respected User
Former Staff
Nov 11, 2017
2,313
6,114
Inbreeding is fraught with the possibility of adverse, multiple genetic disorders, as witnessed by the European Royal Family. So I want that if D gets in "the family way" Martin (with a lot of MMF scenes) is the lucky sperm donor and F gets Olivia, Jennifer, Georgina, Elana, Margo
& Rachel preggo at the ending of the game.
It's a concern, but having a greater chance for expressing recessive traits that can be undesirable can benefit from genetic testing before/after and can help any hopeful couples to understand their risks/results. Given the kind of consideration for health and well-being that this game has showed between F and D over its course, I think it would be completely within their character to approach the concept of conceiving with precautionary genetic counseling.

That is, we don't automatically see a list of horrific, inherited traits from a one-off related pairing - even though their chances of creating offspring with recessive trait selection is elevated vs. sharing genetic material with a random, unrelated member of the general population. My biologically unrelated parents had kids with a range of recessive trait defects - but, they didn't have preventative genetic testing in those days. My unrelated spouse and I went through genetic counseling specifically because of my family's genetic background. D and F could do that from consideration of their related genetic material, too.

Certainly, the chances of selecting for undesirable recessive gene combinations tends to increase with successive generations built upon inbreeding. That's the (European, Egyptian, etc.) royal family situation you mentioned.

But, it would be a neat evolution to manage in the game if all the potential "mating" partners get genetic testing and then decide to interbreed across relationship lines based on the results - rearing respective kids in family situations that don't necessarily reflect the biological pairings meant to offer safest outcomes, but instead by the loving parent pairs. It's actually not unheard of IRL ...
 

Chagatai Khan

Member
Jun 22, 2020
124
184
sovereign: meaning a free individual, (I am my own master and not beholden to anyone or government)
Keep on telling yourself that, anyone with a social security number is property with a serial # attached to them. When ordinary people living under the law go to jail for inconsequential stuff and they can get away literally anything there's a reason for that. Think about diplomatic immunity for example, a diplomat is a foreign government's property. I'm no SJW but have been paying attention for a long while. Do yourself a favor, learn about it, I may be nuts but that doesn't I'm not right!
chagataikhan as to your point of royalty not partaking in incestuous relationships anymore, your right, inasmuch that we don't know about it, but we don't know what we don't know.
No one is truly sovereign in that, in theory at least, everyone is beholden to some government or another. Now, I'm not saying that royals don't get away with things that other high-profile public figures might not get away with, but in this day and age the more known you are the less sovereign you are because all eyes are on you. As I mentioned in my previous post, look at the shit storm that was created by the revalations about Juan Carlos his escapades, the attention that prince Andrew has been getting because of the Epstein connection, not to mention the row between prince Harry and prince William. Royalty often get away with more than most people, but there's a limit to that. Western constitutional monarchies are dependent on funds allocated by their respective parliaments and public approval, amongst other things. A true sovereign, an autokrator (original meaning of the word), would not be.

If you want to be as sovereign in this time as is possible you have to be 1) filthy rich, 2) be unknown to the public and 3) have no issues with your local version of the IRS.

As to royal incest. First degree incest in the European and Middle-Eastern sphere hasn't been practiced for almost two millenia (with the possible exception of Sassanian Iran, but we know too little about the spouses of Sassanian Shah's to know for sure). I also don't see any reason why modern monarchies would take the risk of marrying 1st cousins when the up-side of such a match doesn't exist anymore (keeping land and wealth in the family). The genealogies of all European monarchies are a matter of public record so anybody would be able to find out. You might say that it's all been covered up and although I can't disprove that, you can't prove it either. Keeping conspiracies from becoming public knowledge is fraught with all kinds of difficulties. The president of the US couldn't even keep it a secret that he was poking his cigar in an intern's pussy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Rooster

fried

Almost
Donor
Respected User
Former Staff
Nov 11, 2017
2,313
6,114
IMO that is a very apt descriptor. D was sheltered to the point of becoming socially maladjusted and unable to respond to any sexual stimuli without a great deal of soul searching. That she is now not just open to the idea of more sexual experiences but actively wants pursue them while not wanting to abandon what she has with F is an argument for D treating sex as a hobby. A fun distraction and short escape from the realities of life.
This is a great summary of what has brought them through to Chapter 3's end, wish I could hit on key points so easily. Easily a hobby she's integrated into her lifestyle ... some people have DnD, adult games, fixing their homes, working on their cars, playing cards with friends, etc. - D has a number of social activities INCLUDING her sexual hobby.

I have a good friend who is both polyamorous and has a number of hobbies including bondage/rope suspension and sex hobbies with friends and at clubs (well, at least before the pandemic). When we eventually synch up and swap stories on what's been going on since last talking, her free time activities just happen to have more physical contortions and intimacy than mine. Feels "normal" to me at this point ... because it is.

This is one of the great divide between D only and D sharing routes. In D only she is turned away from outside sex and is only interested in F.
In D sharing (whether it be girl only sharing or full on open options sex for D) we have a D that is less of a social hermit crab and more of a social bunny.
That effectively takes away all the ooh, ahh of the sex and distills it down to D's choices (as it always has been) well, IMHO. We're really talking about two different versions of D, aren't we? I'd be tempted to offer that it could also be seen as two different levels of emotional and relationship maturity for D, but that might not be fair: both versions of D seem equally valid.
 

RustyV

Conversation Conqueror
Game Developer
Dec 30, 2017
7,140
35,918
This is a great summary of what has brought them through to Chapter 3's end, wish I could hit on key points so easily. Easily a hobby she's integrated into her lifestyle ... some people have DnD, adult games, fixing their homes, working on their cars, playing cards with friends, etc. - D has a number of social activities INCLUDING her sexual hobby.

I have a good friend who is both polyamorous and has a number of hobbies including bondage/rope suspension and sex hobbies with friends and at clubs (well, at least before the pandemic). When we eventually synch up and swap stories on what's been going on since last talking, her free time activities just happen to have more physical contortions and intimacy than mine. Feels "normal" to me at this point ... because it is.



That effectively takes away all the ooh, ahh of the sex and distills it down to D's choices (as it always has been) well, IMHO. We're really talking about two different versions of D, aren't we? I'd be tempted to offer that it could also be seen as two different levels of emotional and relationship maturity for D, but that might not be fair: both versions of D seem equally valid.
IMO D only and D sharing D are the same D. Except the D sharing D has given into her desires while D only D has decided (or it has been decided for her) that she is happy with F and doesn't need outside partners.
One D has embraced her sexual appetites and one D has avoided them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Looper9 and fried

ShadowThrone

Active Member
Mar 3, 2020
608
1,178
IMO D only and D sharing D are the same D. Except the D sharing D has given into her desires while D only D has decided (or it has been decided for her) that she is happy with F and doesn't need outside partners.
One D has embraced her sexual appetites and one D has avoided them.
That's a lot of Ds
 

baka

Engaged Member
Modder
Oct 13, 2016
3,725
7,774
so, what about favorite scene? are those changing all the time, like, the latest update will always contain the best scene so far, or is there one scene that always stick that is memorable and maybe even made u love this game?
 

alyath

Member
May 31, 2020
377
362
you haven't lived until you've tittyfucked a pair of big boobs with a bottle of baby oil
It may be Fun. But you have never taken care of a Baby, or not enough. If I smell Babyoil, Babypowder or anything like that. My Lust goes nearly to zero and I search for a Place to clean the little brat. o_O

So I may give it a try, but NEVER EVER with Babyoil.
And I totaly agree with JaegerMister with his delicious itty bitty titty comity. Better a Hand full of Fun, then a Huge one that can kill you during your sleep.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
3.80 star(s) 334 Votes