I don't understand how people say the progression isn't covered well if you choose the sharing options. The fact is though that D has three fairly large influences when it comes to sex. F, Elena and porn. Elena is trying to get D to open up in the early chapters but it wasn't working until F helped break down those barriers that D had built up over the years. Then, F introduces her to porn. She had never watched porn before and Mr Dots uses the choice of porn to help shape D's path through the game. Not just sharing with other men, but women and even her friends too. The threesome scene with D and Elena is a choice that can be effected by the porn D watches. Now that D is more open, Elena is able to push D's boundaries and into the more kinky stuff.
- Thread starter Hitman955
- Start date
- Jul 18, 2020
- 36
- 74
Okay, then I can say that YOU are wrong because:
1. Paths in the game have visible intersection points.
2. Knowing that on the other path the character D is doing exactly the opposite, this changes the impression of her chosen path, and the paths are connected, since there are triggers, moreover, subtle.
3. Because I never said "what people should think", right or wrong, I always described my thoughts in relation to the character and story.
4. I was never against the freedom of choice for D, I just always wanted this choice to be dictated by her unique personality, and not just by a list of popular deviations. For this I "fight" in my posts.
- Oct 13, 2016
- 3,637
- 7,653
1. if you pick the right choice, will take you to the path you want to play.
2. other paths are not for you, stop thinking too much. if you think your path has odd things, report that in the feedback in the discord channel.
3. if so, you failed to communicate that.
4. you can fight, as long your fight is for the path you play. when u start fighting where you should not be, its when you are personal against people that actually enjoy those paths. its not your call.
- the right way:
I like sharing path, I say:
hm, its odd how Martin is behaving in scene X, I think he should be like this instead.
- others will tell me, I agree, or not agree, and we have a discussion about a path we both like but theres something I think its odd.
- the wrong way:
I don't like the sharing path, I say:
hm, I think its wrong that D is going that path, its not her character, she should not dream about other cocks.
- others will not discuss about the dream about other cocks, but that I dont like the sharing path and want it to get removed.
2. other paths are not for you, stop thinking too much. if you think your path has odd things, report that in the feedback in the discord channel.
3. if so, you failed to communicate that.
4. you can fight, as long your fight is for the path you play. when u start fighting where you should not be, its when you are personal against people that actually enjoy those paths. its not your call.
- the right way:
I like sharing path, I say:
hm, its odd how Martin is behaving in scene X, I think he should be like this instead.
- others will tell me, I agree, or not agree, and we have a discussion about a path we both like but theres something I think its odd.
- the wrong way:
I don't like the sharing path, I say:
hm, I think its wrong that D is going that path, its not her character, she should not dream about other cocks.
- others will not discuss about the dream about other cocks, but that I dont like the sharing path and want it to get removed.
- Nov 11, 2017
- 2,313
- 6,103
Pregnancy and child-rearing will interrupt her modelling career to some extent (i.e., she could also model as a pregnant figure, post-pregnant figure, etc. if desired). And it will change her life focus, but she has already expressed a desire to have a kid/kids. So, this is a path she wants to make happen at some point.
D is obviously planning to raise a family with F ... but if someone else turned out to be the genetic father from what they have both agreed were acceptable sexual activities, we don't know if that will have a great impact on how she raises the future child or not.
I don't see a clear penalty here and - quite the opposite - knowing how D consistently adapts to situations by stressing the positive side, if the genetic dad turned out to be someone other than F, I'm sure she would still be happy about the pregnancy and want to give her future child the best opportunities possible.
That is because it is a game. If you want something that has a set character that proceeds in only one direction, may I suggest a book or a movie. The game has choices, what you want is behind a choice, and what others want is behind another. Neither person is wrong for the choice they make. This game has no "canon path". The only thing really set in stone with DMD is D becoming a successful model otherwise events in Sunshine Love would make no sense.
- Jul 18, 2020
- 36
- 74
You can tell what to do to the one you want to tell. I can discuss in the game whatever I want. It is not your call which paths or how long I want to discuss. I read your words, but I’ll hardly answer you, I don’t like the transition to personalities, I don’t want to waste my time on this.
- Jul 18, 2020
- 36
- 74
OK, that sounds good. Let's see how events unfold. I would also like it if the main and minor characters were happy as a result.
- Mar 16, 2018
- 4,641
- 33,693
IMO, It's just a game, so ...P imp D out and let the party begin. While F, joins, watches or shoots the festivities with the camera D bought him.
Inbreeding is fraught with the possibility of adverse, multiple genetic disorders, as witnessed by the European Royal Family. So I want that if D gets in "the family way" Martin (with a lot of MMF scenes) is the lucky sperm donor and F gets Olivia, Jennifer, Georgina, Elana, Margo
& Rachel preggo at the ending of the game.
Well, my reply remains the same as before, it won't happen in my plays, but I have no issues with sharing being in there, for those that wanna see it. I like the love story told between the MC and the Daughter almost as much as I liked the one told between the MC and Melody (btw, nice crossover with having Koko be in this one 
) so if anyone is ending up the father of her kid it's gonna be the MC. Now, that being said, I absolutely would not mind it if we could get a side story where Elena is the primary love interest. She's fucking awesome and deserves to be somebodies everything... *wink wink nudge nudge MrDots* Rachel however? Yeah that bitch can fuck right off. Fucking her daughters boyfriend behind her back and that's why he hasn't contacted her? Yeah her and Frank can go die painfully in the nearest ditch. Edit: The problem with wanting that Elena side story however seems to be that while MrDots seems to be ok with giving us a character that has small breasts, it can never be the main love interest.
) so if anyone is ending up the father of her kid it's gonna be the MC. Now, that being said, I absolutely would not mind it if we could get a side story where Elena is the primary love interest. She's fucking awesome and deserves to be somebodies everything... *wink wink nudge nudge MrDots* Rachel however? Yeah that bitch can fuck right off. Fucking her daughters boyfriend behind her back and that's why he hasn't contacted her? Yeah her and Frank can go die painfully in the nearest ditch. Edit: The problem with wanting that Elena side story however seems to be that while MrDots seems to be ok with giving us a character that has small breasts, it can never be the main love interest.
Last edited:
If done for several generations, yes, inbreeding is fraught with the possibility of multiple adverse genetic disorders. One generation of it isn't likely to be all that bad. I know incest that leads to kids is a touchy subject, even here, but one generation of inbreeding isn't likely to lead to all that webbed feet horror show nonsense everyone is always so concerned about.
- Mar 16, 2018
- 4,641
- 33,693
your right that's why it 's illegal, exceptions are royalty, because they're sovereign and we are not.
Well, to be honest, when has the illegality of something ever really stopped those that really wanted to do it?
- Mar 16, 2018
- 4,641
- 33,693
- Mar 16, 2018
- 4,641
- 33,693
I partake in that little green plant that is probably the true key to world peace.though I don't partake in either
As much as I love weed, it's probably better that most people don't smoke it on a daily basis. It isn't exactly conducive to getting things done and that's ignoring a certain amount of people who shouldn't ever smoke it because they go completely off their rocker.
Very true. Still though, it's nice to dream eh? Like, people would be too busy eating cereal, watching cartoons and playing porn games to cause trouble lol
- May 14, 2017
- 1,796
- 1,596
They are not any more sovereign, then you or I. Simply another delusional mental construct to facilitate division and oppression.
Obviously in utopia that would be the case. Who knows maybe if the whole primary and secondary sectors of the economy get automated this could happen.
I'm thinking he litteraly meant that they're sovereigns, which is the correct term. Now, most sovereigns, at least the western ones, aren't truly sovereign any more, considering that they are constrained by parliaments and public opinion (just look at the recent self-imposed exile of Juan Carlos of Spain). However he was incorrect in claiming that royalty engage in incest nowadays. Even in the past the only incest that might have been allowed was between 1st degree cousins and in the case of catholics they would have needed a Papal dispensation to be able to do so. (All of this only applies to western monarchies, I don't know enough about the Middle-Eastern, African and Asian ones to be able to reliably comment on them).