Create and Fuck your AI Cum Slut -70% Summer Sale
x

Lex Liber

Newbie
Jul 18, 2020
36
74
1. if you pick the right choice, will take you to the path you want to play.
2. other paths are not for you, stop thinking too much. if you think your path has odd things, report that in the feedback in the discord channel.
3. if so, you failed to communicate that.
4. you can fight, as long your fight is for the path you play. when u start fighting where you should not be, its when you are personal against people that actually enjoy those paths. its not your call.
You can tell what to do to the one you want to tell. I can discuss in the game whatever I want. It is not your call which paths or how long I want to discuss. I read your words, but I’ll hardly answer you, I don’t like the transition to personalities, I don’t want to waste my time on this.
 

Lex Liber

Newbie
Jul 18, 2020
36
74
Pregnancy and child-rearing will interrupt her modelling career to some extent (i.e., she could also model as a pregnant figure, post-pregnant figure, etc. if desired). And it will change her life focus, but she has already expressed a desire to have a kid/kids. So, this is a path she wants to make happen at some point.

D is obviously planning to raise a family with F ... but if someone else turned out to be the genetic father from what they have both agreed were acceptable sexual activities, we don't know if that will have a great impact on how she raises the future child or not.

I don't see a clear penalty here and - quite the opposite - knowing how D consistently adapts to situations by stressing the positive side, if the genetic dad turned out to be someone other than F, I'm sure she would still be happy about the pregnancy and want to give her future child the best opportunities possible.
OK, that sounds good. Let's see how events unfold. I would also like it if the main and minor characters were happy as a result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fried

Big Rooster

Forum Fanatic
Mar 16, 2018
4,889
35,722
the sharing path has not turned F into a pimp that is passing her around.
IMO, It's just a game, so ...P imp D out and let the party begin. While F, joins, watches or shoots the festivities with the camera D bought him.

if the genetic dad turned out to be someone other than F, I'm sure she would still be happy about the pregnancy and want to give her future child the best opportunities possible.
Inbreeding is fraught with the possibility of adverse, multiple genetic disorders, as witnessed by the European Royal Family. So I want that if D gets in "the family way" Martin (with a lot of MMF scenes) is the lucky sperm donor and F gets Olivia, Jennifer, Georgina, Elana, Margo
& Rachel preggo at the ending of the game.
 

JaegerMister

Member
Jun 28, 2020
275
233
Well, my reply remains the same as before, it won't happen in my plays, but I have no issues with sharing being in there, for those that wanna see it. I like the love story told between the MC and the Daughter almost as much as I liked the one told between the MC and Melody (btw, nice crossover with having Koko be in this one ;)) so if anyone is ending up the father of her kid it's gonna be the MC. Now, that being said, I absolutely would not mind it if we could get a side story where Elena is the primary love interest. She's fucking awesome and deserves to be somebodies everything... *wink wink nudge nudge MrDots* Rachel however? Yeah that bitch can fuck right off. Fucking her daughters boyfriend behind her back and that's why he hasn't contacted her? Yeah her and Frank can go die painfully in the nearest ditch. Edit: The problem with wanting that Elena side story however seems to be that while MrDots seems to be ok with giving us a character that has small breasts, it can never be the main love interest.
 
Last edited:

JaegerMister

Member
Jun 28, 2020
275
233
IMO, It's just a game, so ...P imp D out and let the party begin. While F, joins, watches or shoots the festivities with the camera D bought him.


Inbreeding is fraught with the possibility of adverse, multiple genetic disorders, as witnessed by the European Royal Family. So I want that if D gets in "the family way" Martin (with a lot of MMF scenes) is the lucky sperm donor and F gets Olivia, Jennifer, Georgina, Elana, Margo
& Rachel preggo at the ending of the game.
If done for several generations, yes, inbreeding is fraught with the possibility of multiple adverse genetic disorders. One generation of it isn't likely to be all that bad. I know incest that leads to kids is a touchy subject, even here, but one generation of inbreeding isn't likely to lead to all that webbed feet horror show nonsense everyone is always so concerned about.
 

Big Rooster

Forum Fanatic
Mar 16, 2018
4,889
35,722
If done for several generations, yes, inbreeding is fraught with the possibility of multiple adverse genetic disorders. One generation of it isn't likely to be all that bad. I know incest that leads to kids is a touchy subject, even here, but one generation of inbreeding isn't likely to lead to all that webbed feet horror show nonsense everyone is always so concerned about.
your right that's why it 's illegal, exceptions are royalty, because they're sovereign and we are not.
 

Chagatai Khan

Member
Jun 22, 2020
124
184
I partake in that little green plant that is probably the true key to world peace.
As much as I love weed, it's probably better that most people don't smoke it on a daily basis. It isn't exactly conducive to getting things done and that's ignoring a certain amount of people who shouldn't ever smoke it because they go completely off their rocker.
 

JaegerMister

Member
Jun 28, 2020
275
233
As much as I love weed, it's probably better that most people don't smoke it on a daily basis. It isn't exactly conducive to getting things done and that's ignoring a certain amount of people who shouldn't ever smoke it because they go completely off their rocker.
Very true. Still though, it's nice to dream eh? Like, people would be too busy eating cereal, watching cartoons and playing porn games to cause trouble lol
 

401Grem

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2017
1,801
1,620
your right that's why it 's illegal, exceptions are royalty, because they're sovereign and we are not.
They are not any more sovereign, then you or I. Simply another delusional mental construct to facilitate division and oppression.
 

Chagatai Khan

Member
Jun 22, 2020
124
184
Very true. Still though, it's nice to dream eh? Like, people would be too busy eating cereal, watching cartoons and playing porn games to cause trouble lol
Obviously in utopia that would be the case. Who knows maybe if the whole primary and secondary sectors of the economy get automated this could happen.

They are not any more sovereign, then you or I. Simply another delusional mental construct to facilitate division and oppression.
I'm thinking he litteraly meant that they're sovereigns, which is the correct term. Now, most sovereigns, at least the western ones, aren't truly sovereign any more, considering that they are constrained by parliaments and public opinion (just look at the recent self-imposed exile of Juan Carlos of Spain). However he was incorrect in claiming that royalty engage in incest nowadays. Even in the past the only incest that might have been allowed was between 1st degree cousins and in the case of catholics they would have needed a Papal dispensation to be able to do so. (All of this only applies to western monarchies, I don't know enough about the Middle-Eastern, African and Asian ones to be able to reliably comment on them).
 

Big Rooster

Forum Fanatic
Mar 16, 2018
4,889
35,722
They are not any more sovereign, then you or I. Simply another delusional mental construct to facilitate division and oppression.
sovereign: meaning a free individual i.e. (I am my own master and not beholden to anyone or government)
Keep on telling yourself that, anyone with a social security number is property with a serial # attached to them. When ordinary people living under the law go to jail for inconsequential stuff and they can get away literally anything there's a reason for that. I'm no SJW but have been paying attention for a long while. Do yourself a favor, learn about it, I may be nuts but that doesn't I'm not right!
chagataikhan as to your point of royalty not partaking in incestuous relationships anymore, your right, inasmuch that we don't know about it, but we don't know what we don't know.
 
Last edited:

oaiki

Well-Known Member
Mar 19, 2020
1,396
2,713
I would not agree with this, in my opinion this is just some idealization of the world. On the contrary, I and many others, including philosophers, believe (including from empirical experience) that "every desire has it`s own price." Therefore, the phrase "only limits to her desires are within her own imagination" seems somewhat simplistic for a "independent personality." Otherwise, I would agree.

...

It's a fucking (a gratuitous expletive and adjective) game, a fantasy born from the art and scripted by its imaginator. It's a fantasy universe which allows you to escape from the strictures of real life with impunity. Until you post, no one knows you play these games nor do they know what kinks you have nor where you draw your “moral” line. Frankly, no one cares other than that your post grants them licence to remonstrate or agree with you. The games here are offered for free, sometimes to the detriment of the developers' revenue base; a revenue base that allows them to continue producing the games which you obviously enjoy. If you do not like a game's direction, choices or scenarios, don't play it; there are a plethora of games that you may find more agreeable. If you want to change or influence its direction, subscribe on the developer's subscription site and engage with them there where you are more likely to be heard; if you have already done so and been rejected, don't bring your arguments here. As a freeloader here you have no no rights. Your posts about what a character in a fantasy should or would do in real life are irrelevant and boring; they detract from the value of these forums.
 
Last edited:

RustyV

Conversation Conqueror
Game Developer
Dec 30, 2017
7,146
36,012
The warning of exacting a "price" assumes a necessary balance within her life, perhaps implying a moralistic or cautionary quality is involved in D's ability to exercise her sexual desire in whatever way is available to her that seems attainable or interesting.

So, there seems to be an undercurrent in your post which implies that D's exponential ramp-up of sexual experiences and initimacy with friends, acquaintances is somehow an aspect of life which must necessarily be curated or that it comes with a balance of expense. It's merely another form of her blossoming expression from within, enabled almost fully by a combination of F's desire to support her happiness and those she meets wanting to get in her (or her partner's) pants. Given that her only other priorities in life are firming the definition of her lifestyle with F at its core - which includes long-lasting income options and a mutually desirable living space - she literally has only her imagination holding her back when it comes to expressing herself in this sexual hobby.

And that's what it is for her at this point: an enjoyable activity, without remorse and filled with verve to experience more, wondering what can come next as much as appreciating what she already enjoys.

Her rampup in sexual activities has not made D drop career plans, desire to own a home and to marry + procreate with F - if anything, she apparently feels closer to him from all the trust and open experiences they have shared, discussed and mutually allowed.

Sexuality can be a valid aspect of someone's lifestyle, there is no need to view it as a limitation to other aspects of her life simply because she has so many options available from which she might sample and dig deeper into exercising.

Anyone seeking to remind D that she has limits on sexual tastes and forays - even while she's still successfully balancing other aspects of her life which are both necessary and fulfilling - would seem to be placing their own values upon her. In the reality of Donutistan, I have a feeling D would find little to learn from if such abstract ideals were offered to her as a warning or guide for her life when all evidence suggests she's doing just fine.
First kudos for using verve.
I like how you describe D's sexual activity as a hobby.
IMO that is a very apt descriptor. D was sheltered to the point of becoming socially maladjusted and unable to respond to any sexual stimuli without a great deal of soul searching. That she is now not just open to the idea of more sexual experiences but actively wants pursue them while not wanting to abandon what she has with F is an argument for D treating sex as a hobby. A fun distraction and short escape from the realities of life.
This is one of the great divide between D only and D sharing routes. In D only she is turned away from outside sex and is only interested in F.
In D sharing (whether it be girl only sharing or full on open options sex for D) we have a D that is less of a social hermit crab and more of a social bunny.
 

RustyV

Conversation Conqueror
Game Developer
Dec 30, 2017
7,146
36,012
They are not any more sovereign, then you or I. Simply another delusional mental construct to facilitate division and oppression.
I would disagree. Royalty can transcend everyday people and become symbols of national identity.
Which is a double edged sword in that if your nation is doing well the Royals get public adoration, Queen Victoria. If however the nation is a mess the Royals can bear the blame and end up becoming the focus of the wrath of the people, the Czar and his family.
 
3.80 star(s) 334 Votes