- Apr 12, 2018
- 237
- 460
I don't think anyone is demanding a high degree of psychological health. I could understand if she was 'rocked' by a revelation that the story of her parents wasn't what she'd been led to believe. What doesn't make sense is how quick she takes to the alternative, especially given that her father is the only parent she's ever known and someone she has sexual feelings for, strong enough that she'd write and post stories about them on the internet.A high degree of psychological health and consistency seem demanded of Amanda.
Maybe higher than of people in real life?
Maybe she would back off and try and assess the situation, but it's not just her actions. Her words are cold and have no warmth or care. She doesn't come across as conflicted, which is what Palmer wanted to convey. The only indicator to the contrary is the sex scene, but it's timing and placement within the story make it seem forced. I think it would have been better if it'd happened earlier, like when they went to separate bedrooms, maybe she crawls back into bed with him, they have sex but when he wakes shes gone again. That kind of scene might have indicated that she was struggling between what she was being told verses what she felt.
Honestly, I think Palmer and the writers got a good idea but got a bit too trigger happy in executing it. Again, we're not demanding a high degree of psychological health, we're lamenting the fact that the writing doesn't give us a clear indication of what her psychological health really is.
Amanda can have flaws. She doesn't have to be perfect. But you also can't suddenly begin a new chapter and declare 'character x has the sin of pride' if they haven't been arrogant or self-involved before. If anything, Amanda's fatal flaw would be her loyalty, at least until recently, considering she gives up a lot to stay with her father and build the business back up.Even of the (otherwise) most attractive, noblest or best: > "hamartia" in Ancient Greek tragedy.
No they're not. Plot devices are simply tools you use to build a story, but they still have to make sense within the context of the story. In other words, it doesn't matter how much you hammer in a nail if you should be using a drill and screw, at someone point what you've built is going to fall apart because you didn't use the right tool for the job.2) if Amanda (and the others too) were wise, all-seeing, all-knowing creatures, perhaps there might not be this or many other storylines. ~ Gripping drama needs mistakes and serious, even catastrophic misperceptions. Intense fallouts, sudden coldness, intrigues and bewilderments, strange bedfellows, unexplained behavior ... are, at least, a dramatically necessary device.
I may come across as really pissed about this, but honestly it's just disappointing because I did feel that the story was previously well written, and this just feels like a major misstep. @fauxplayer suggests that maybe it's all an act, which might be the only way I could buy the sudden change, but even then I still feel that there should be more conflict within her actions, that she should want to tell him everything, but knows its in his best interests to keep him in the dark. It also puts the MC in a passive, rather than active state, and in fact I'm starting to wonder if this story should have been from Amanda's point of view all along. I know then we wouldn't get to fuck Heidi or Kathy, but it's really starting to seem that Amanda is the MC making all the decisions that we just seem to be orbiting around.