Well what would you like to talk about? I mean it genuenly. oh and there are a plethora of games where you are "submissive" in this context but they are mostly story driven. Does it really matter one way or the other? and i mean that truely. It's something to talk about at least. We could all just be sitting here waiting in silence for the next update when we all report the bugs and in general kiss Vrels butt. And you would like that very much, wouldn't you?
Eh, fair enough. I of course think a game can have both scope and depth it just takes work, effort and dilligence at the helm of which we are(questionably) getting. This game has been in Dev for 2 years was it? might be 3 and has no end in sight just from what Vrel wants to add himself so as for that last bit, buckle up buckaroo it's going to be a loooooooong ride.
I really wish I was as optimistic as you haha. I disagree though, I can't think of a genuinely good game that has strayed from its initial kinks and delved into a wider scope and maintained its quality, maybe I just don't play enough games but some of the "bigger" games like TITS by Fenoxo which have a huge range but is incredibly shallow and has about the same depth as a puddle.
I've actually seen that movie before. It was pretty good, caught me by surprise.
There are some great(for me anyway) games that you can play in clashing styles that stay truely awesome. They for sure arn't these current "porn" games but for me this game has accended from those anyway(i play this as a GAME and not just to FAP). And i think this game will "join" their ranks(again for me personally) and it's because of the RolePlayer aspect this game has. It invites you to "play how you want". And look i do get MrCrazy123's point i just think it IS possable(i'm an optimist i guess) to do it right, but i guess only time will tell. Oh and you can read my review for what i think this game IS, i'm just excited about what COULD be. I personally would like more of the"seductive" style added. Acting "submissive" while getting exactly what you want out of NPCs and i do get abit of that but there could always be more added.
It's true, and I think this fact should be more advertised in order to ward off those that are looking for a different experience.
TBH, the very first comments in the thread already give less than subtle hints what to expect of the game, so probably most of those who are not satisfied with lack of dominant options either can't be bothered to read or simply don't care and will ask for the game to be something different anyawy.
None of that screams dominant or being in control. By playing DoL you agree to be sucked into a world your orphan boy/girl did not consent to. It does not say that YOUR PC is lewd, but rather, everybody else in town has nefarious intentions regarding your body. You're treated like a piece of meat. Anybody who complains that there isn't any PC dominant situations are either blind or willfully ignored the description in hopes of seeking for something that did not exist in the first place. The only thing that remotely resembles "dominant" content is Robin's route, as s/he has a submissive personality in the first place.
You're right MrCrazy i could have worded my first response better so i'll try again.
I wasn't even going to bother but here we go:
What I quoted outlines the entire premise of the game and what your gameplay will be built around. You lack the ability to read between the lines--or better yet--extract a deeper meaning from the game's premise. It doesn't say "only be the victim (or submissive)" because your PC is dropped into a world where s/he is powerless from the getgo. This is why in the game, despite building your athletics, swimming skills and strength stat to the max, going all the way defiant and punching, kicking, and biting opponents, you will STILL end up in MANY situations where you are gangbanged, beaten, overpowered, and sometimes restrained.
There was no point in adding this useless block of text.
Sam's event is not dominant and neither is the bully event. One plays on a food fetish and the other is just straight-up being a good samaritan that increases your social role into being a good guy. You can dredge up more examples but they'll be wrong, as were your existing examples. Other examples I can think of that you'll probably bring up (and will be wrong about) are Leighton's blackmail event, where you either get your ass kicked or nothing happens. Bailey's event, where you end up getting your ass kicked again if you win the first refusal to pay up. Refuse to submit to the priests after breaking the vow, where you are immediately bound and transported into the room with others.
See my last two sentences above.
You need severe hallus to see the eerie light. Controlled does not matter.
I do have the "severe" hallucinations but only as a feature of the Blood Moon itself. Are there no prompts between the Deviancy 1/2 "Watch"/"Lick" options and the "enter Tentacle Plains" part? Or is it an entirely separate event which only appears if you have Deviancy 5 and alters the state of the mirror from the get-go?
You were on the right track.
I will add my 5 cents to Midge's reply, as I started this current discussion by making an observation to them that a lot of frustration with this games comes from players who wish to play it as a manly boy and are unable to find many ways to do so, because despite the advertised sandboxy and highly customizable character of this game, it really isn't. And as Midge rightly observed, the premise of the game is "play[ing] an 18-year-old boy or girl in a town full of people with lewd intentions: go[ing] to school and find[ing] honest work, turn[ing] to a life of crime, or sell[ing] your body in more carnal ways.
The PC's penis is not a penis as long as their penetrating with it is considered an act of submission. Interestingly enough, females using strapons (which are prosthetic dicks, after all) on the PC will be considered the dominant (topping) party. If sexual fantasies and enjoyment one can derive from this game are to be plausible then we should all agree that a boy is not just a flat-chested girl with a dick slapped on and that said dick is basically just a protruding or prolapsed vagina for the PC, a receptacle to other people's lust, while the NPCs' dicks (real and rubber ones alike) represent all the dominant phallic might that they posses. Penile virginity? Really? Never thought that phimosis is equivalent of a hymen. In the male submission / sissification / transformation genre NOT using one's dick is considered submissive, not the other way around. Why then wearing a chastity cage is equal to wearing a chastity belt, which is protection from other people's sexual advances?
Imma number and run through.
