- Sep 27, 2017
- 2,929
- 3,697
Pretty much this. People always assume that devs have malicious intent when that is very often not the case. The stuff they are doing now with fixing the code, etc, should have been done a long time ago. Now with all the content they have in the game it is a lot harder to fix. This is one of the reasons why I don't really complain when devs decide to remake/rework early content just after a couple of releases. It is better that they do all that stuff early than having to deal with this kind of situations in the future.So as Skummy says this is NOT evil intent or malicious profiteering, it is incompetence.
I believe it is around 15-16 GB, I think someone from the team mentioned it a while ago(I might be incorrect), but they were trying to get it reduced. It won't be a problem for me as I have fast internet but could be for a lot of their patreons.Well everyone has to admit that they are not trying to take money.
As Eku7 points out their revenue has shrunk to almost 1/3 whereas if they left the buggy shit as is and just slapped new content together they would very much have made A LOT more money.
So as Skummy says this is NOT evil intent or malicious profiteering, it is incompetence.
At this point it is best to just wait for them to clear this reprogram hurdle with the one benefit being that all new content will be on better framework and easier to merge. So then they can go back to production (which was pretty good levels if I recall correctly).
The other big unanswered question is how big will it be at the end of the merge? If it is too big you will need to torrent the content. Do they want to merge the next full 30 day month into one month or one merge total? Because well.... I would hope their Subs/Patrons vote no on merging anything that big. Again leading to the how the hell do you host something that big?
My random thoughts
PEACE
Incompetence can only go so far as a defense, at some point it has to be regarded as "willful ignorance" at best or "gross negligence" at worst. Also it's possible to scam people without malicious intent, and even perpetuate such a scam without recognizing it.So as Skummy says this is NOT evil intent or malicious profiteering, it is incompetence.
Myself and others made the same arguments about "reprogramming for a better framework" during the W1 merge delay, and here we are again. At this point I think it's clear that progressing with the release of ES is just not a priority for BC. I'm not even talking about compared to the whole of his life. I'm saying that just within the limited scope of his priorities regarding ES, something or somethings are more important to him than release. Maybe he's super picky about the people he's willing to work with. Maybe his relationship with the main programmer (who is apparently still ill?) makes him reluctant to bring in a replacement, even temporarily. Maybe it's something largely outside of his control, like some sort of artistic OCD or an autism-spectrum condition. This doesn't mean he's not invested in the future of ES, just that he's unwilling or unable to take what I would consider reasonable steps to push for release.At this point it is best to just wait for them to clear this reprogram hurdle with the one benefit being that all new content will be on better framework and easier to merge.
(that was posted during the wait for D6 release...)Kinda feeling like I stumbled into a crackhouse in the midst of an awful crack-shortage xD
YesJust passing through with a little question, don't know about any of the drama going on behind this but uh...what DM patch do you install for week 3? Do I just use the day 20+21?
Based on what was posted to this thread after the last Patreon update the last thing they're working on is making the character bios work with the translation system. I didn't see anyone copy the actual patreon post to share here, and I'm not a patron myself so I don't know how reliable that info is. I also don't know why that would take over a month to do.Does anyone know what bluecoat is stuck on with the game?
Both by the meaning of the term and legal standards, it really isn't. "Scam" is effectively just a common word for "fraud" in which a person uses lies to profit without providing something of value in return. Unless Bluecat has come to a full stop on work and is just pocketing the money this isn't a scam.Also it's possible to scam people without malicious intent
Incompetence can only go so far as a defense, at some point it has to be regarded as "willful ignorance" at best or "gross negligence" at worst. Also it's possible to scam people without malicious intent, and even perpetuate such a scam without recognizing it.
Somewhat true! By the non-legal definitions (My account name is Semantics, not Legalese, so I'm not touching that), a scam does need to have malicious intent behind it.Both by the meaning of the term and legal standards, it really isn't. "Scam" is effectively just a common word for "fraud" in which a person uses lies to profit without providing something of value in return. Unless Bluecat has come to a full stop on work and is just pocketing the money this isn't a scam.
Something can be labelled as a 'Scam' if something is promised but not delivered. Like if someone were to have grand ideas for a product and sell the idea to customers only for the end product to fall far short of their promises. The initial person could have nothing but good intentions but be without the ability, resources or knowledge to deliver on their ideas.....Both by the meaning of the term and legal standards, it really isn't. "Scam" is effectively just a common word for "fraud" in which a person uses lies to profit without providing something of value in return. Unless Bluecat has come to a full stop on work and is just pocketing the money this isn't a scam.
This is probably one of the best things I've heard. I like the game, wanted more, and want to give Bluecat some money but I just dont know if there will be any beta/alpha or something any time soon or if they can be trusted to get a product out. It also tells a good way to donate to patreons. If people constantly miss deadlines or cant give regular updates (ideally once a month and with evidence of progress) it's probably better to steer clear of them.That said, all this misses the biggest issue. Even if this merge gets completed and released tomorrow, there will always be more setbacks and issues, more team members getting sick or quitting or any number of issues. Past a certain point, incompetence (It's almost certainly this one, there are far easier ways to scam than this) or scam makes no difference, because current patrons and potential patrons lose hope. And that's important, because Patreon is built on getting people to believe in your project and ability to complete it. There are certain devs who could release a new 0.1 and not get two patrons to rub together for their efforts because they've burned all good will. Bluecat isn't anywhere near there yet, but long delays while only posting non-content news every two months is a great way to get there eventually.
All I can say is, "scam" is an informal term, and assuming my view of the situation is correct (briefly, that BC is less driven to produce a release than patrons believe he is or expect him to be) I think it's wholly appropriate. Generally, I consider any financial relationship where the intentions of the receiver(s) aren't in alignment with the expectations of the contributor(s) potentially deserving of the label.Both by the meaning of the term and legal standards, it really isn't. "Scam" is effectively just a common word for "fraud" in which a person uses lies to profit without providing something of value in return. Unless Bluecat has come to a full stop on work and is just pocketing the money this isn't a scam.
Well, the socially agreed upon definition of scam is "A dishonest scheme," so intent matters when most people are using the term. If people start using their own definitions for words, communication becomes more difficult. I see this a lot when people insist upon their own definitions of netorare, scam, and such.All I can say is, "scam" is an informal term, and assuming my view of the situation is correct (briefly, that BC is less driven to produce a release than patrons believe he is or expect him to be) I think it's wholly appropriate. Generally, I consider any financial relationship where the intentions of the receiver(s) aren't in alignment with the expectations of the contributor(s) potentially deserving of the label.
At the same time I'm fully aware that, as someone who doesn't really buy into the idea of Patreon, I may be inappropriately projecting onto those who do. Or at least, onto those who continue to patronize BC.
And the thing is, even with your socially agreed upon definition the term is still appropriate in my mind, because I don't believe dishonesty necessarily implies intent do deceive. Delving into that would take us down a philosophical and etymological rabbit hole though.Well, the socially agreed upon definition of scam is "A dishonest scheme," so intent matters when most people are using the term. If people start using their own definitions for words, communication becomes more difficult. I see this a lot when people insist upon their own definitions of netorare, scam, and such.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”