Spectr3 One question I have, is it allowed to just spread confirm-able lies in reviews? Because his review calls this a sequel for example, when it is a remake, and says 4gb is too big for a bunch of .gifs, but this game has not a single .gif file in it. It's only static images, or video files.
I also find it strange that using real porn is allowed to be a reason to give it a bad review, am I really allowed to give a 1 star to every game because I don't agree with the visual medium they've chosen? Not to mention that he clearly is not objective, or even trying to. Quote from review "I had to write this review to bring it down a notch", that just screams objectivity. In fact, in the review itself, he calls it a two star game, but is rating it as low as possible to make the average rating go down. Is that how the review system is intended to be used on this site?
I don't see the point of reviews if there is no curation. A similar game that suffers from similar problems is for example Jack-o-nine-tails, and guess what, that developer got burned out too and is no longer coding for it, due to reviews that are utterly filled with falsehoods and hate. Take a look at the rant said developer posted:https://f95zone.to/threads/jack-o-n...tsman-community-developpment.390/post-2758573, and if you see the reviewers' replies to his rant, you will see that they were not objective at all, so what's the point in reviews. They're just a place for people that do not like the game/dev, to tear it down with hate.
Which results in devs leaving the site, and people that actually enjoyed the game and wanted to play it being unable to do so. I don't see why it's more important that accounts with 0 posts and 0 contribution apart from hate filled reviews filled with information that is plainly incorrect if they did even the most basic fact checking, should be allowed to leave those reviews over removing them when they contain verifiable falsehoods.
I'm not a big member of this site, but I've been here for a long time. And I've seen the same story happen over and over. Active developers are criticized over small things by people that barely played their games or did any research. Those players move on to another game, but the developer is left demotivated. Since the reviews have been added, and it's not just forum posts a dev can defend himself from, the problem has only worsened. We are heading down a similar path hongfire was, where every dev was criticized so harshly that development stagnated.
I also find it strange that using real porn is allowed to be a reason to give it a bad review, am I really allowed to give a 1 star to every game because I don't agree with the visual medium they've chosen? Not to mention that he clearly is not objective, or even trying to. Quote from review "I had to write this review to bring it down a notch", that just screams objectivity. In fact, in the review itself, he calls it a two star game, but is rating it as low as possible to make the average rating go down. Is that how the review system is intended to be used on this site?
I don't see the point of reviews if there is no curation. A similar game that suffers from similar problems is for example Jack-o-nine-tails, and guess what, that developer got burned out too and is no longer coding for it, due to reviews that are utterly filled with falsehoods and hate. Take a look at the rant said developer posted:https://f95zone.to/threads/jack-o-n...tsman-community-developpment.390/post-2758573, and if you see the reviewers' replies to his rant, you will see that they were not objective at all, so what's the point in reviews. They're just a place for people that do not like the game/dev, to tear it down with hate.
Which results in devs leaving the site, and people that actually enjoyed the game and wanted to play it being unable to do so. I don't see why it's more important that accounts with 0 posts and 0 contribution apart from hate filled reviews filled with information that is plainly incorrect if they did even the most basic fact checking, should be allowed to leave those reviews over removing them when they contain verifiable falsehoods.
I'm not a big member of this site, but I've been here for a long time. And I've seen the same story happen over and over. Active developers are criticized over small things by people that barely played their games or did any research. Those players move on to another game, but the developer is left demotivated. Since the reviews have been added, and it's not just forum posts a dev can defend himself from, the problem has only worsened. We are heading down a similar path hongfire was, where every dev was criticized so harshly that development stagnated.
Last edited: