A - Who said Faust let other people decide the trials? It's not mentionned anywhere.
Well, it seems quite obvious that it is this way, considering Lucius actions which Faust did not notice. He obviously did not check the tower before he died or he would have noticed that the female scentist is missing (sorry, i can't remember the names adhoc)
+ This holy woman seems to be very much misinformed about the trials and whats going on there.
I also wonder why he did not suspect fould play as lucius requested living beings to experiment on... hell... letting such people design trials for your successor?
I am not sure in what way it would please him to put a bullet through the head of the person he designated as an heir?
Maybe i am misremembering, but i have a vague reall of a conversation between MC and this Holy woman Advisor, and one of them mentioning that this trial was not going as it was supposed to be...
If Faust would have decided how the Trials go, wouldn't he have told his "advisor" more details? - Whats the point of setting someone up to look after the participant, if the supervisor has no clue and no power at all? - Just to witness the trialist getting killed?
B - Well, the thing is Faust didn't plan to die in the first place so the trial was supposed to be held in a different manner obviously but unfortunately, he did died, hence the current situation. As for why he picked MC to be his heir and not someone else or more people, that's something that will be explained down the line in the story. You can't judge the current standing of the story without having all the cards in hands after all
Even if he didnt plan to die (who does...?) - he obviously planned for the worst - or he wouldn't have setup everything the way it is. Lumia and Umbra, the tower, the holy woman etc.
Thats what puzzles me. If i set myself in his shoes, i am a powerful being, that _might_ die. So i prepare for the worst... ok. Understandable.
But this means i have to make sure something of my power remains - or someone able to wield it - or it would be pointless having an heir at all and i could simply let everything die with me. (if he did not die, he would not even need a successor or think about this, so he must have at least considered the possibility)
So if it is that important to have an heir... then how the hell is it appropriate to get him killed if he isn't saved by chance - or rather by the reckless actions of his companion.
Could Faust have predicted that she would run, distracting the Killer android? That she would do this at just the right moment to not get killed herself (and thus being useless as further help) and getting the heir killed in the followup? - Quite the Gamble if you ask me.
So either he didn't intend the trial to be lethal... and if this is the case lucius clearly overstepped his boundaries here (thus why i mentioned that Faust did not design the trials himself, at least not in this detail) ... or he simply had some quite serious habit on gambling for a positive outcome ... there is no fallback plan at all, is there?
Plan A was to survive himself...
Plan B was to have an Heir continuing his Legacy, wielding his power or whatever...
But what was plan C ? - If plan B is obviously that fragile...
Maybe its just me overthinking this, bad habit of finding logical flaws... but i can not for the sake of my life guess why someone should do such a setup, it simply makes no other sense to me other than drama...